184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28923006)
21. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Do oncology researchers adhere to reproducible and transparent principles? A cross-sectional survey of published oncology literature.
Walters C; Harter ZJ; Wayant C; Vo N; Warren M; Chronister J; Tritz D; Vassar M
BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e033962. PubMed ID: 31892667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Development and Evaluation of the Algorithm CErtaInty Tool (ACE-IT) to Assess Electronic Medical Record and Claims-based Algorithms' Fit for Purpose for Safety Outcomes.
Singh S; Beyrer J; Zhou X; Swerdel J; Harvey RA; Hornbuckle K; Russo L; Ghauri K; Abi-Elias IH; Cox JS; Rodriguez-Watson C
Drug Saf; 2023 Jan; 46(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 36396894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Critical Care Health Informatics Collaborative (CCHIC): Data, tools and methods for reproducible research: A multi-centre UK intensive care database.
Harris S; Shi S; Brealey D; MacCallum NS; Denaxas S; Perez-Suarez D; Ercole A; Watkinson P; Jones A; Ashworth S; Beale R; Young D; Brett S; Singer M
Int J Med Inform; 2018 Apr; 112():82-89. PubMed ID: 29500026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Promoting Responsible Electronic Documentation: Validity Evidence for a Checklist to Assess Progress Notes in the Electronic Health Record.
Bierman JA; Hufmeyer KK; Liss DT; Weaver AC; Heiman HL
Teach Learn Med; 2017; 29(4):420-432. PubMed ID: 28497983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A Guide to Reproducibility in Preclinical Research.
Samsa G; Samsa L
Acad Med; 2019 Jan; 94(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 29995667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Independent discussion sections for improving inferential reproducibility in published research.
Avidan MS; Ioannidis JPA; Mashour GA
Br J Anaesth; 2019 Apr; 122(4):413-420. PubMed ID: 30857597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.
Philips Z; Ginnelly L; Sculpher M; Claxton K; Golder S; Riemsma R; Woolacoot N; Glanville J
Health Technol Assess; 2004 Sep; 8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. PubMed ID: 15361314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Analytical code sharing practices in biomedical research.
Sharma NK; Ayyala R; Deshpande D; Patel YM; Munteanu V; Ciorba D; Fiscutean A; Vahed M; Sarkar A; Guo R; Moore A; Darci-Maher N; Nogoy NA; Abedalthagafi MS; Mangul S
bioRxiv; 2023 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 37609176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Analysis of practices to promote reproducibility and transparency in anaesthesiology research.
Okonya O; Rorah D; Tritz D; Umberham B; Wiley M; Vassar M
Br J Anaesth; 2020 Nov; 125(5):835-842. PubMed ID: 32611528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evidence-based statistical analysis and methods in biomedical research (SAMBR) checklists according to design features.
Dwivedi AK; Shukla R
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2020 Aug; 3(4):e1211. PubMed ID: 32794640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Optimization of Electronic Medical Records for Data Mining Using a Common Data Model.
Kwong M; Gardner HL; Dieterle N; Rentko V
Top Companion Anim Med; 2019 Dec; 37():100364. PubMed ID: 31837755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Why rankings of biomedical image analysis competitions should be interpreted with care.
Maier-Hein L; Eisenmann M; Reinke A; Onogur S; Stankovic M; Scholz P; Arbel T; Bogunovic H; Bradley AP; Carass A; Feldmann C; Frangi AF; Full PM; van Ginneken B; Hanbury A; Honauer K; Kozubek M; Landman BA; März K; Maier O; Maier-Hein K; Menze BH; Müller H; Neher PF; Niessen W; Rajpoot N; Sharp GC; Sirinukunwattana K; Speidel S; Stock C; Stoyanov D; Taha AA; van der Sommen F; Wang CW; Weber MA; Zheng G; Jannin P; Kopp-Schneider A
Nat Commun; 2018 Dec; 9(1):5217. PubMed ID: 30523263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of an electronic health record audit used in a chiropractic teaching clinic system: an observational study.
Injeyan HS; Hogg-Johnson S; Abdulla S; Chow N; Cox J; Ridding A; Jacobs C
BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Jul; 21(1):750. PubMed ID: 34320964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Irreproducibility in Preclinical Biomedical Research: Perceptions, Uncertainties, and Knowledge Gaps.
Jarvis MF; Williams M
Trends Pharmacol Sci; 2016 Apr; 37(4):290-302. PubMed ID: 26776451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. An assessment of transparency and reproducibility-related research practices in otolaryngology.
Johnson AL; Torgerson T; Skinner M; Hamilton T; Tritz D; Vassar M
Laryngoscope; 2020 Aug; 130(8):1894-1901. PubMed ID: 31593300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Rapid Development of Specialty Population Registries and Quality Measures from Electronic Health Record Data*. An Agile Framework.
Kannan V; Fish JS; Mutz JM; Carrington AR; Lai K; Davis LS; Youngblood JE; Rauschuber MR; Flores KA; Sara EJ; Bhat DG; Willett DL
Methods Inf Med; 2017 Jun; 56(99):e74-e83. PubMed ID: 28930362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Facilitating biomedical researchers' interrogation of electronic health record data: Ideas from outside of biomedical informatics.
Hruby GW; Matsoukas K; Cimino JJ; Weng C
J Biomed Inform; 2016 Apr; 60():376-84. PubMed ID: 26972838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Reliability of Electronic Health Record Data Used for Obstetrical Research.
Altman MR; Colorafi K; Daratha KB
Appl Clin Inform; 2018 Jan; 9(1):156-162. PubMed ID: 29514352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
