These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28923165)
1. Cross-sectional study of area-level disadvantage and glycaemic-related risk in community health service users in the Southern.IML Research (SIMLR) cohort. Cross R; Bonney A; Mayne DJ; Weston KM Aust Health Rev; 2019 Feb; 43(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 28923165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Socioeconomic disadvantage and its implications for population health planning of obesity and overweight, using cross-sectional data from general practices from a regional catchment in Australia. Ghosh A; Charlton KE; Batterham MJ BMJ Open; 2016 May; 6(5):e010405. PubMed ID: 27142857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Geographic variation in cardiometabolic risk factor prevalence explained by area-level disadvantage in the Illawarra-Shoalhaven region of the NSW, Australia. Toms R; Mayne DJ; Feng X; Bonney A Sci Rep; 2020 Jul; 10(1):12770. PubMed ID: 32728133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inequalities in glycemic control in childhood onset type 2 diabetes in England and Wales-A national population-based longitudinal study. Khanolkar AR; Amin R; Taylor-Robinson D; Viner RM; Warner J; Stephenson T Pediatr Diabetes; 2019 Nov; 20(7):821-831. PubMed ID: 31329349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Disparities in glycaemic control, monitoring, and treatment of type 2 diabetes in England: A retrospective cohort analysis. Whyte MB; Hinton W; McGovern A; van Vlymen J; Ferreira F; Calderara S; Mount J; Munro N; de Lusignan S PLoS Med; 2019 Oct; 16(10):e1002942. PubMed ID: 31589609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Socioeconomic status and diabetes technology use in youth with type 1 diabetes: a comparison of two funding models. Lomax KE; Taplin CE; Abraham MB; Smith GJ; Haynes A; Zomer E; Ellis KL; Clapin H; Zoungas S; Jenkins AJ; Harrington J; de Bock MI; Jones TW; Davis EA Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2023; 14():1178958. PubMed ID: 37670884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Socioeconomic status and time in glucose target range in people with type 2 diabetes: a baseline analysis of the GP-OSMOTIC study. Tan ML; Manski-Nankervis JA; Thuraisingam S; Jenkins A; O'Neal D; Furler J BMC Endocr Disord; 2018 Jul; 18(1):47. PubMed ID: 30031385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Examining the Association between Neighbourhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Type 2 Diabetes Comorbidity in Serious Mental Illness. Walsan R; Mayne DJ; Feng X; Pai N; Bonney A Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Oct; 16(20):. PubMed ID: 31618833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Area-Level Socioeconomic Gradients in Overweight and Obesity in a Community-Derived Cohort of Health Service Users - A Cross-Sectional Study. Bonney A; Mayne DJ; Jones BD; Bott L; Andersen SE; Caputi P; Weston KM; Iverson DC PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0137261. PubMed ID: 26317861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved Glycemic Outcomes With Diabetes Technology Use Independent of Socioeconomic Status in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes. Lomax KE; Taplin CE; Abraham MB; Smith GJ; Haynes A; Zomer E; Ellis KL; Clapin H; Zoungas S; Jenkins AJ; Harrington J; de Bock MI; Jones TW; Davis EA; Diabetes Care; 2024 Apr; 47(4):707-711. PubMed ID: 38324670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cancer survival disparities worsening by socio-economic disadvantage over the last 3 decades in new South Wales, Australia. Tervonen HE; Aranda S; Roder D; You H; Walton R; Morrell S; Baker D; Currow DC BMC Public Health; 2017 Sep; 17(1):691. PubMed ID: 28903750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sex differences and correlates of poor glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study in Brazil and Venezuela. G Duarte F; da Silva Moreira S; Almeida MDCC; de Souza Teles CA; Andrade CS; Reingold AL; Moreira ED BMJ Open; 2019 Mar; 9(3):e023401. PubMed ID: 30842107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trends and socioeconomic disparities in diabetes prevalence and quality of care among Israeli children; 2011-2018. Loewenberg Weisband Y; Krieger M; Calderon-Margalit R; Manor O Isr J Health Policy Res; 2020 Aug; 9(1):41. PubMed ID: 32819418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Glycaemic control and associated factors among patients with diabetes at public health clinics in Johor, Malaysia. Mahmood MI; Daud F; Ismail A Public Health; 2016 Jun; 135():56-65. PubMed ID: 26976488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-Term Implications of Socioeconomic Status on Major Adverse Cardiovascular, Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE), and All-Cause Mortality. Ganes A; Hughes W; Williams LJ; Stuart AL; Pasco JA Heart Lung Circ; 2024 Aug; 33(8):1221-1226. PubMed ID: 38719696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The association between sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and poor glycaemic control: a longitudinal cohort study. McBrien KA; Manns BJ; Hemmelgarn BR; Weaver R; Edwards AL; Ivers N; Rabi D; Lewanczuk R; Braun T; Naugler C; Campbell D; Saad N; Tonelli M Diabet Med; 2016 Nov; 33(11):1499-1507. PubMed ID: 26526088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Area-based inequalities and distribution of healthcare resources for managing diabetes in South Korea: a cross-sectional multilevel analysis. Ha R; Jung-Choi K BMJ Open; 2022 Feb; 12(2):e055360. PubMed ID: 35197349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Extent and Predictors of Poor Glycaemic Control among Elderly Pakistani Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Multi-Centre Cross-Sectional Study. Atif M; Saleem Q; Asghar S; Malik I; Ahmad N Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Jan; 55(1):. PubMed ID: 30658518 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of diabetes duration on the relationship between glycaemic control and risk of death in older adults with type 2 diabetes. Ghouse J; Isaksen JL; Skov MW; Lind B; Svendsen JH; Kanters JK; Olesen MS; Holst AG; Nielsen JB Diabetes Obes Metab; 2020 Feb; 22(2):231-242. PubMed ID: 31596048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of geographic unit of analysis on socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival and distant summary stage - a population-based study. Tervonen HE; Morrell S; Aranda S; Roder D; You H; Niyonsenga T; Walton R; Baker D; Currow D Aust N Z J Public Health; 2017 Apr; 41(2):130-136. PubMed ID: 27960223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]