These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28923437)

  • 21. Constantly evolving safety assessment protocols for GM foods.
    Sesikeran B; Vasanthi S
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17 Suppl 1():241-4. PubMed ID: 18296346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Genetically modified plants and food hypersensitivity diseases: usage and implications of experimental models for risk assessment.
    Prescott VE; Hogan SP
    Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Aug; 111(2):374-83. PubMed ID: 16364445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Incorporation of in vitro digestive enzymes in an intestinal epithelial cell line model for protein hazard identification.
    Markell LK; Wezalis SM; Roper JM; Zimmermann C; Delaney B
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2017 Oct; 44():85-93. PubMed ID: 28652201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Genetically modified food (food derived from biotechnology): current and future trends in public acceptance and safety assessment].
    Nishiura H; Imai H; Nakao H; Tsukino H; Kuroda Y; Katoh T
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 2002 Nov; 49(11):1135-41. PubMed ID: 12508467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Allergenicity testing of GM crops.
    Aalberse RC
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Oct; 26(10):1070-1; author reply 1071-2. PubMed ID: 18846066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The aryloxyalkanoate dioxygenase-12 (AAD-12) protein is not acutely toxic in mice.
    Papineni S; Golden RM; Thomas J
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2017 Dec; 110():200-203. PubMed ID: 29066407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Challenges in testing genetically modified crops for potential increases in endogenous allergen expression for safety.
    Panda R; Ariyarathna H; Amnuaycheewa P; Tetteh A; Pramod SN; Taylor SL; Ballmer-Weber BK; Goodman RE
    Allergy; 2013 Feb; 68(2):142-51. PubMed ID: 23205714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The problem with nutritionally enhanced plants.
    Schubert DR
    J Med Food; 2008 Dec; 11(4):601-5. PubMed ID: 18721071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Allergenicity assessment of genetically modified crops--what makes sense?
    Goodman RE; Vieths S; Sampson HA; Hill D; Ebisawa M; Taylor SL; van Ree R
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Jan; 26(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 18183024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of potential adjuvanticity of Cry proteins.
    Joshi SS; Barnett B; Doerrer NG; Glenn K; Herman RA; Herouet-Guicheney C; Hunst P; Kough J; Ladics GS; McClain S; Papineni S; Poulsen LK; Rascle JB; Tao AL; van Ree R; Ward J; Bowman CC
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Aug; 79():149-155. PubMed ID: 27105772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. GM crops in Africa: challenges in Egypt.
    Abdallah N
    GM Crops; 2010; 1(3):116-9. PubMed ID: 21844668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Application of food and feed safety assessment principles to evaluate transgenic approaches to gene modulation in crops.
    Parrott W; Chassy B; Ligon J; Meyer L; Petrick J; Zhou J; Herman R; Delaney B; Levine M
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2010 Jul; 48(7):1773-90. PubMed ID: 20399824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In vivo studies on possible health consequences of genetically modified food and feed--with particular regard to ingredients consisting of genetically modified plant materials.
    Pryme IF; Lembcke R
    Nutr Health; 2003; 17(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 12803276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative safety testing of genetically modified foods in a 90-day rat feeding study design allowing the distinction between primary and secondary effects of the new genetic event.
    Knudsen I; Poulsen M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Oct; 49(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 17719159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bioinformatics and the allergy assessment of agricultural biotechnology products: industry practices and recommendations.
    Ladics GS; Cressman RF; Herouet-Guicheney C; Herman RA; Privalle L; Song P; Ward JM; McClain S
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Jun; 60(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 21320564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Crop conundrum.
    Dubock AC
    Nutr Rev; 2009 Jan; 67(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 19146502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Genetically Modified Organisms and the Future Global Nutrient Supply: Part of the Solution or a New Problem?
    Phillips PW
    World Rev Nutr Diet; 2016; 115():153-63. PubMed ID: 27197734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Subchronic toxicity study in vivo and allergenicity study in vitro for genetically modified rice that expresses pharmaceutical protein (human serum albumin).
    Sheng Y; Qi X; Liu Y; Guo M; Chen S; He X; Huang K; Xu W
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2014 Oct; 72():242-6. PubMed ID: 25086369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessment of possible allergenicity of hypothetical ORFs in common food crops using current bioinformatic guidelines and its implications for the safety assessment of GM crops.
    Young GJ; Zhang S; Mirsky HP; Cressman RF; Cong B; Ladics GS; Zhong CX
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2012 Oct; 50(10):3741-51. PubMed ID: 22867756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Transgenes for tea?
    Heritage J
    Trends Biotechnol; 2005 Jan; 23(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 15629853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.