These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28925038)

  • 1. Modelling time to population extinction when individual reproduction is autocorrelated.
    Lee AM; Saether BE; Markussen SS; Engen S
    Ecol Lett; 2017 Nov; 20(11):1385-1394. PubMed ID: 28925038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling reproductive trajectories of roe deer females: fixed or dynamic heterogeneity?
    Plard F; Bonenfant C; Delormeb D; Gaillard JM
    Theor Popul Biol; 2012 Dec; 82(4):317-28. PubMed ID: 23316493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal life schedule with stochastic growth in age-size structured models: theory and an application.
    Oizumi R; Takada T
    J Theor Biol; 2013 Apr; 323():76-89. PubMed ID: 23391431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When rarity has costs: coexistence under positive frequency-dependence and environmental stochasticity.
    Schreiber SJ; Yamamichi M; Strauss SY
    Ecology; 2019 Jul; 100(7):e02664. PubMed ID: 30773621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interacting effects of unobserved heterogeneity and individual stochasticity in the life history of the southern fulmar.
    Jenouvrier S; Aubry LM; Barbraud C; Weimerskirch H; Caswell H
    J Anim Ecol; 2018 Jan; 87(1):212-222. PubMed ID: 28886208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the Influence of Temporal Autocorrelations on the Population Dynamics of a Disturbance Specialist Plant Population in a Random Environment.
    Eager EA; Pilson D; Alexander HM; Tenhumberg B
    Am Nat; 2017 Oct; 190(4):570-583. PubMed ID: 28937813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A stochastic model for annual reproductive success.
    Kendall BE; Wittmann ME
    Am Nat; 2010 Apr; 175(4):461-8. PubMed ID: 20163244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extinction in relation to demographic and environmental stochasticity in age-structured models.
    Engen S; Lande R; aether BE; Weimerskirch H
    Math Biosci; 2005 Jun; 195(2):210-27. PubMed ID: 15907948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modelling effects of nonbreeders on population growth estimates.
    Lee AM; Reid JM; Beissinger SR
    J Anim Ecol; 2017 Jan; 86(1):75-87. PubMed ID: 27625075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extinction risk depends strongly on factors contributing to stochasticity.
    Melbourne BA; Hastings A
    Nature; 2008 Jul; 454(7200):100-3. PubMed ID: 18596809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Population viability analysis of plant and animal populations with stochastic integral projection models.
    Jaffré M; Le Galliard JF
    Oecologia; 2016 Dec; 182(4):1031-1043. PubMed ID: 27586695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Establishment success and extinction risk in autocorrelated environments.
    Haccou P; Vatutin V
    Theor Popul Biol; 2003 Nov; 64(3):303-14. PubMed ID: 14522171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of demographic structure on key properties of stochastic density-independent population dynamics.
    Vindenes Y; Sæther BE; Engen S
    Theor Popul Biol; 2012 Dec; 82(4):253-63. PubMed ID: 22051856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Demographic stochasticity, allee effects, and extinction: the influence of mating system and sex ratio.
    Lee AM; Saether BE; Engen S
    Am Nat; 2011 Mar; 177(3):301-13. PubMed ID: 21460539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can life history predict the effect of demographic stochasticity on extinction risk?
    Jeppsson T; Forslund P
    Am Nat; 2012 Jun; 179(6):706-20. PubMed ID: 22617260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Density-dependent life history and the dynamics of small populations.
    Mugabo M; Perret S; Legendre S; Le Galliard JF
    J Anim Ecol; 2013 Nov; 82(6):1227-39. PubMed ID: 23859253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Decomposing demographic contributions to the effective population size with moose as a case study.
    Lee AM; Myhre AM; Markussen SS; Engen S; Solberg EJ; Haanes H; Røed K; Herfindal I; Heim M; Saether BE
    Mol Ecol; 2020 Jan; 29(1):56-70. PubMed ID: 31732991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual heterogeneity in vital parameters and demographic stochasticity.
    Vindenes Y; Engen S; Saether BE
    Am Nat; 2008 Apr; 171(4):455-67. PubMed ID: 20374136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A slow life in hell or a fast life in heaven: demographic analyses of contrasting roe deer populations.
    Nilsen EB; Gaillard JM; Andersen R; Odden J; Delorme D; van Laere G; Linnell JD
    J Anim Ecol; 2009 May; 78(3):585-94. PubMed ID: 19379139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproductive value and the stochastic demography of age-structured populations.
    Engen S; Lande R; Saether BE; Dobson FS
    Am Nat; 2009 Dec; 174(6):795-804. PubMed ID: 19842946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.