These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28925269)

  • 21. An updated systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic and robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy for managing pelvic organ prolapse.
    Chang CL; Chen CH; Yang SS; Chang SJ
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Oct; 16(5):1037-1045. PubMed ID: 34779989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Pan K; Cao L; Ryan NA; Wang Y; Xu H
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jan; 27(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 26179552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Role of robotic surgery on pelvic floor reconstruction.
    Giannini A; Russo E; Malacarne E; Cecchi E; Mannella P; Simoncini T
    Minerva Ginecol; 2019 Feb; 71(1):4-17. PubMed ID: 30318878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
    Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Robotic approaches to prolapse surgery.
    Rosenblum N
    Curr Opin Urol; 2012 Jul; 22(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 22647648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A prospective randomized trial comparing Restorelle® Y mesh and flat mesh for laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: 24-month outcomes.
    Ferrando CA; Paraiso MFR
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Jun; 32(6):1565-1570. PubMed ID: 33471144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluating the morbidity and long-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with and without robotic assistance for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Lallemant M; Tresch C; Puyraveau M; Delplanque S; Cosson M; Ramanah R
    J Robot Surg; 2021 Oct; 15(5):785-792. PubMed ID: 33247428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of functional outcomes with purely laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy in obese women.
    Joubert M; Thubert T; Lefranc JP; Vaessen C; Chartier-Kastler É; Deffieux X; Rouprêt M
    Prog Urol; 2014 Dec; 24(17):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25450756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Robotic or laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus open sacrohysteropexy for uterus preservation in pelvic organ prolapse.
    Paek J; Lee M; Kim BW; Kwon Y
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Apr; 27(4):593-9. PubMed ID: 26514118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. One-year functional and anatomic outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal extraperitoneal colpopexy with mesh.
    Jambusaria LH; Murphy M; Lucente VR
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 25185594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Robot-assisted Vs Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for High-stage Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-center Study.
    Illiano E; Ditonno P; Giannitsas K; De Rienzo G; Bini V; Costantini E
    Urology; 2019 Dec; 134():116-123. PubMed ID: 31563536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse: with or without robotic assistance.
    Chan SS; Pang SM; Cheung TH; Cheung RY; Chung TK
    Hong Kong Med J; 2011 Feb; 17(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 21282827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy using Seratex Slimsling: pilot study.
    Vašíček M; Pilka R; Eim JB
    Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(6):412-417. PubMed ID: 31948248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Safety and perioperative morbidity of laparoscopic sacropexy: a systematic analysis and a comparison with laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Joukhadar R; Baum S; Radosa J; Gerlinger C; Hamza A; Juhasz-Böss I; Solomayer EF
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Mar; 295(3):641-649. PubMed ID: 27896472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Long-Term Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Using Lightweight Y-Mesh.
    Culligan PJ; Lewis C; Priestley J; Mushonga N
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Mar; 26(3):202-206. PubMed ID: 31688526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The 26-Minute Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy: Do We Really Need Robotic Technology?
    Miklos JR; Moore RD
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(5):712. PubMed ID: 25769671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpo(recto)pexy: a cumulative sum analysis.
    van Zanten F; Schraffordt Koops SE; Pasker-De Jong PCM; Lenters E; Schreuder HWR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 221(5):483.e1-483.e11. PubMed ID: 31152711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Single-port robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with magnetic retraction: first experience using the SP da Vinci platform.
    Ganesan V; Goueli R; Rodriguez D; Hess D; Carmel M
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Oct; 14(5):753-758. PubMed ID: 32036495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Postoperative adverse events and re-treatment among patients who have undergone laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse in Japan.
    Shigemi D; Okada A; Yasunaga H
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Apr; 161(1):114-119. PubMed ID: 36200666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Laparoscopic pectopexy: the learning curve and comparison with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Chuang FC; Chou YM; Wu LY; Yang TH; Chen WH; Huang KH
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1949-1956. PubMed ID: 34406417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.