178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28925817)
1. Using multiple classifiers for predicting the risk of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair re-intervention through hybrid feature selection.
Attallah O; Karthikesalingam A; Holt PJ; Thompson MM; Sayers R; Bown MJ; Choke EC; Ma X
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2017 Nov; 231(11):1048-1063. PubMed ID: 28925817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feature selection through validation and un-censoring of endovascular repair survival data for predicting the risk of re-intervention.
Attallah O; Karthikesalingam A; Holt PJE; Thompson MM; Sayers R; Bown MJ; Choke EC; Ma X
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Aug; 17(1):115. PubMed ID: 28774329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian neural network approach for determining the risk of re-intervention after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.
Attallah O; Ma X
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Sep; 228(9):857-66. PubMed ID: 25212212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Top scoring pairs for feature selection in machine learning and applications to cancer outcome prediction.
Shi P; Ray S; Zhu Q; Kon MA
BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Sep; 12():375. PubMed ID: 21939564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative study on feature selection for a risk prediction model for colorectal cancer.
Cueto-López N; García-Ordás MT; Dávila-Batista V; Moreno V; Aragonés N; Alaiz-Rodríguez R
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Aug; 177():219-229. PubMed ID: 31319951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new hybrid filter/wrapper algorithm for feature selection in classification.
Zhang J; Xiong Y; Min S
Anal Chim Acta; 2019 Nov; 1080():43-54. PubMed ID: 31409474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of censoring on learning Bayesian networks in survival modelling.
Stajduhar I; Dalbelo-Basić B; Bogunović N
Artif Intell Med; 2009 Nov; 47(3):199-217. PubMed ID: 19833488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Novel Rank Aggregation-Based Hybrid Multifilter Wrapper Feature Selection Method in Software Defect Prediction.
Balogun AO; Basri S; Mahamad S; Capretz LF; Imam AA; Almomani MA; Adeyemo VE; Kumar G
Comput Intell Neurosci; 2021; 2021():5069016. PubMed ID: 34868291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of feature selection and classification for MALDI-MS data.
Liu Q; Sung AH; Qiao M; Chen Z; Yang JY; Yang MQ; Huang X; Deng Y
BMC Genomics; 2009 Jul; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3. PubMed ID: 19594880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-assisted lip diagnosis on Traditional Chinese Medicine using multi-class support vector machines.
Li F; Zhao C; Xia Z; Wang Y; Zhou X; Li GZ
BMC Complement Altern Med; 2012 Aug; 12():127. PubMed ID: 22898352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Novel Feature Selection and Voting Classifier Algorithms for COVID-19 Classification in CT Images.
El-Kenawy EM; Ibrahim A; Mirjalili S; Eid MM; Hussein SE
IEEE Access; 2020; 8():179317-179335. PubMed ID: 34976558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of Endovascular Aortic Repair in the Treatment of Infected Aortic Aneurysms Complicated by Aortoenteric or Aortobronchial Fistulae.
Kan CD; Lee HL; Yang YJ
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Apr; 66(3):240-247. PubMed ID: 29207434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Missing data imputation, prediction, and feature selection in diagnosis of vaginal prolapse.
Fan M; Peng X; Niu X; Cui T; He Q
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):259. PubMed ID: 37932660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ensemble of heterogeneous classifiers for diagnosis and prediction of coronary artery disease with reduced feature subset.
Velusamy D; Ramasamy K
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Jan; 198():105770. PubMed ID: 33027698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histogram of Oriented Gradient-Based Fusion of Features for Human Action Recognition in Action Video Sequences.
Patel CI; Labana D; Pandya S; Modi K; Ghayvat H; Awais M
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Dec; 20(24):. PubMed ID: 33353248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of High-Risk Cytogenetic Status in Multiple Myeloma Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Utility of Radiomics and Comparison of Machine Learning Methods.
Liu J; Zeng P; Guo W; Wang C; Geng Y; Lang N; Yuan H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Oct; 54(4):1303-1311. PubMed ID: 33979466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening nonrandomized studies for medical systematic reviews: a comparative study of classifiers.
Bekhuis T; Demner-Fushman D
Artif Intell Med; 2012 Jul; 55(3):197-207. PubMed ID: 22677493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Machine-learning models for activity class prediction: A comparative study of feature selection and classification algorithms.
Chong J; Tjurin P; Niemelä M; Jämsä T; Farrahi V
Gait Posture; 2021 Sep; 89():45-53. PubMed ID: 34225240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cancer Classification Utilizing Voting Classifier with Ensemble Feature Selection Method and Transcriptomic Data.
Khatun R; Akter M; Islam MM; Uddin MA; Talukder MA; Kamruzzaman J; Azad A; Paul BK; Almoyad MAA; Aryal S; Moni MA
Genes (Basel); 2023 Sep; 14(9):. PubMed ID: 37761941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A PCA aided cross-covariance scheme for discriminative feature extraction from EEG signals.
Zarei R; He J; Siuly S; Zhang Y
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Jul; 146():47-57. PubMed ID: 28688489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
