These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2892675)

  • 1. Comments and perspective on the EPA workshop on "The relationship between short-term test information and carcinogenicity".
    Kier LD
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1988; 11(1):147-57. PubMed ID: 2892675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Workshop on the relationship between short-term information and carcinogenicity; Williamsburg, Virginia, January 20-23, 1987.
    Auletta A; Ashby J
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1988; 11(1):135-45. PubMed ID: 2892674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetic toxicology at the crossroads--a personal view on the deployment of short-term tests for predicting carcinogenicity.
    Bridges BA
    Mutat Res; 1988; 205(1-4):25-31. PubMed ID: 3367919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An analysis by chemical class of Salmonella mutagenicity tests as predictors of animal carcinogenicity.
    Claxton LD; Stead AG; Walsh D
    Mutat Res; 1988; 205(1-4):197-225. PubMed ID: 3285187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Current status of the Gene-Tox Program.
    Auletta AE; Kier LD; Mitchell AD
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1990; 340D():273-81. PubMed ID: 2371300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An overview of current efforts in short-term carcinogen testing.
    Milman HA; Hurley PM; Auletta A
    Environ Health Perspect; 1983 Apr; 50():355-7. PubMed ID: 6873027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An approach to identifying specialized batteries of bioassays for specific classes of chemicals: class analysis using mutagenicity and carcinogenicity relationships and phylogenetic concordance and discordance patterns. 1. Composition and analysis of the overall data base. A report of phase II of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox Program.
    Ray VA; Kier LD; Kannan KL; Haas RT; Auletta AE; Wassom JS; Nesnow S; Waters MD
    Mutat Res; 1987 May; 185(3):197-241. PubMed ID: 3574331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of environmental carcinogens: a strategy for the mid-1980s.
    Rosenkranz HS; Klopman G; Chankong V; Pet-Edwards J; Haimes YY
    Environ Mutagen; 1984; 6(2):231-58. PubMed ID: 6546717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comment on the US EPA recommendation for genotoxicity guidelines on chemicals.
    Ishidate M
    Mutat Res; 1992 Aug; 272(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 1380121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Personal comments on 'Environmental Protection Agency' proposed guidelines for mutagenicity risk assessment.
    Sobels FH
    Mutat Res; 1985 Aug; 147(4):211-6. PubMed ID: 4022034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic toxicology data in the evaluation of potential human environmental carcinogens.
    Waters MD; Stack HF; Jackson MA
    Mutat Res; 1999 Jul; 437(1):21-49. PubMed ID: 10425388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bioassay techniques for evaluating the possible carcinogenicity of adsorber effluents.
    Bull RJ; Pereira MA; Blackburn KL
    J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol; 1987; 7(7-8):403-16. PubMed ID: 3694487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A review and analysis of the Chinese hamster ovary/hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase assay to determine the mutagenicity of chemical agents. A report of phase III of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox Program.
    Li AP; Gupta RS; Heflich RH; Wassom JS
    Mutat Res; 1988 Jul; 196(1):17-36. PubMed ID: 3292898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. EPA use of in vivo germ cell mutagenicity data.
    Cimino MC
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1991; 18(4):295-7. PubMed ID: 1748093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mutagenicity test schemes and guidelines: U.S. EPA Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics and Office of Pesticide Programs.
    Auletta AE; Dearfield KL; Cimino MC
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1993; 21(1):38-45; discussion 46-57. PubMed ID: 8419153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Considerations in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's testing approach for mutagenicity.
    Dearfield KL; Auletta AE; Cimino MC; Moore MM
    Mutat Res; 1991 Nov; 258(3):259-83. PubMed ID: 1719404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Short-term tests for defining mutagenic carcinogens.
    Waters MD; Stack HF; Jackson MA
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):499-536. PubMed ID: 10353401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of genetic toxicology data in U.S. EPA risk assessment: the mercury study report as an example.
    Schoeny R
    Environ Health Perspect; 1996 May; 104 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):663-73. PubMed ID: 8781402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of reduced protocols for carcinogenicity testing of chemicals: report of a joint EPA/NIEHS workshop.
    Lai DY; Baetcke KP; Vu VT; Cotruvo JA; Eustis SL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1994 Apr; 19(2):183-201. PubMed ID: 8041916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Salmonella typhimurium/mammalian microsomal assay. A report of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox Program.
    Kier LD; Brusick DJ; Auletta AE; Von Halle ES; Brown MM; Simmon VF; Dunkel V; McCann J; Mortelmans K
    Mutat Res; 1986 Sep; 168(2):69-240. PubMed ID: 3528831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.