These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28927289)

  • 21. Empirical Markov Chain Monte Carlo Bayesian analysis of fMRI data.
    de Pasquale F; Del Gratta C; Romani GL
    Neuroimage; 2008 Aug; 42(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 18538586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Likelihood-based hypothesis tests for brain activation detection from MRI data disturbed by colored noise: a simulation study.
    den Dekker AJ; Poot DH; Bos R; Sijbers J
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Feb; 28(2):287-96. PubMed ID: 19188115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. On applicability of PCA, voxel-wise variance normalization and dimensionality assumptions for sliding temporal window sICA in resting-state fMRI.
    Remes JJ; Abou Elseoud A; Ollila E; Haapea M; Starck T; Nikkinen J; Tervonen O; Silven O
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 31(8):1338-48. PubMed ID: 23845397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Resting-state fMRI data reflects default network activity rather than null data: A defense of commonly employed methods to correct for multiple comparisons.
    Slotnick SD
    Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 8(3):141-143. PubMed ID: 28002981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An empirical comparison of SPM preprocessing parameters to the analysis of fMRI data.
    Della-Maggiore V; Chau W; Peres-Neto PR; McIntosh AR
    Neuroimage; 2002 Sep; 17(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 12482065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does parametric fMRI analysis with SPM yield valid results? An empirical study of 1484 rest datasets.
    Eklund A; Andersson M; Josephson C; Johannesson M; Knutsson H
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jul; 61(3):565-78. PubMed ID: 22507229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The impact of "physiological correction" on functional connectivity analysis of pharmacological resting state fMRI.
    Khalili-Mahani N; Chang C; van Osch MJ; Veer IM; van Buchem MA; Dahan A; Beckmann CF; van Gerven JM; Rombouts SA
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 65():499-510. PubMed ID: 23022093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Equitable Thresholding and Clustering: A Novel Method for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clustering in AFNI.
    Cox RW
    Brain Connect; 2019 Sep; 9(7):529-538. PubMed ID: 31115252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of a non-stationary voxelation-corrected cluster-size test with TFCE for group-Level MRI inference.
    Li H; Nickerson LD; Nichols TE; Gao JH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Mar; 38(3):1269-1280. PubMed ID: 27785843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pattern classification of fMRI data: applications for analysis of spatially distributed cortical networks.
    Yourganov G; Schmah T; Churchill NW; Berman MG; Grady CL; Strother SC
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():117-32. PubMed ID: 24705202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cluster mass inference via random field theory.
    Zhang H; Nichols TE; Johnson TD
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jan; 44(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 18805493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of spatial smoothing on fMRI group inferences.
    Mikl M; Marecek R; Hlustík P; Pavlicová M; Drastich A; Chlebus P; Brázdil M; Krupa P
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 May; 26(4):490-503. PubMed ID: 18060720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cluster failure revisited: Impact of first level design and physiological noise on cluster false positive rates.
    Eklund A; Knutsson H; Nichols TE
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 May; 40(7):2017-2032. PubMed ID: 30318709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Resting-state networks in healthy adult subjects: a comparison between a 32-element and an 8-element phased array head coil at 3.0 Tesla.
    Paolini M; Keeser D; Ingrisch M; Werner N; Kindermann N; Reiser M; Blautzik J
    Acta Radiol; 2015 May; 56(5):605-13. PubMed ID: 25585849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sensitivity enhancement of task-evoked fMRI using ensemble empirical mode decomposition.
    Lin SH; Lin GH; Tsai PJ; Hsu AL; Lo MT; Yang AC; Lin CP; Wu CW
    J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Jan; 258():56-66. PubMed ID: 26523767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bootstrapping fMRI Data: Dealing with Misspecification.
    Roels SP; Moerkerke B; Loeys T
    Neuroinformatics; 2015 Jul; 13(3):337-52. PubMed ID: 25672877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A variance components model for statistical inference on functional connectivity networks.
    Fiecas M; Cribben I; Bahktiari R; Cummine J
    Neuroimage; 2017 Apr; 149():256-266. PubMed ID: 28130192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bootstrap generation and evaluation of an fMRI simulation database.
    Bellec P; Perlbarg V; Evans AC
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Dec; 27(10):1382-96. PubMed ID: 19570641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mapping the end-tidal CO2 response function in the resting-state BOLD fMRI signal: spatial specificity, test-retest reliability and effect of fMRI sampling rate.
    Golestani AM; Chang C; Kwinta JB; Khatamian YB; Jean Chen J
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jan; 104():266-77. PubMed ID: 25462695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.