These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28927578)

  • 41. Effects of Natural Sound Therapy on Pain and Agitation Induced by Endotracheal Suctioning: A Real-World Study.
    Ruan Q; Li C; Qiu M; Wan L; Sun T
    Am J Crit Care; 2024 Jul; 33(4):299-303. PubMed ID: 38945820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A systematic review of observational pain assessment instruments for use with nonverbal intubated critically ill adult patients in the emergency department: an assessment of their suitability and psychometric properties.
    Varndell W; Fry M; Elliott D
    J Clin Nurs; 2017 Jan; 26(1-2):7-32. PubMed ID: 27685422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Bispectral index correlates well with Richmond agitation sedation scale in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.
    Karamchandani K; Rewari V; Trikha A; Batra RK
    J Anesth; 2010 Jun; 24(3):394-8. PubMed ID: 20225074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Efficacy and safety of nalbuphine on analgesia of patients in intensive care unit].
    Liu S; Wan Y; Luo Y; Wan L; Yun W; Wang H; Wang Z; Duan X; Zhang R; Zhao Y; Cui H; Sun T
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2018 May; 30(5):471-476. PubMed ID: 29764554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Validity and Reliability of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale in Pediatric Intensive Care Patients: A Multicenter Study.
    Tapia R; López-Herce J; Arias Á; Del Castillo J; Mencía S
    Front Pediatr; 2021; 9():795487. PubMed ID: 35047463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU).
    Aljuaid MH; Deeb AM; Dbsawy M; Alsayegh D; Alotaibi M; Arabi YM
    BMC Psychiatry; 2018 Apr; 18(1):91. PubMed ID: 29625595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Validation of the critical-care pain observation tool in adult patients.
    Gélinas C; Fillion L; Puntillo KA; Viens C; Fortier M
    Am J Crit Care; 2006 Jul; 15(4):420-7. PubMed ID: 16823021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Behavioral pain scale may not be reliable in awake non-verbal intensive care patients: a case control study.
    Waydhas C; Ull C; Cruciger O; Hamsen U; Schildhauer TA; Gaschler R; Weckwerth C
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2024 Feb; 24(1):84. PubMed ID: 38424502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Validation of the critical-care pain observation tool in adult critically ill patients.
    Buttes P; Keal G; Cronin SN; Stocks L; Stout C
    Dimens Crit Care Nurs; 2014; 33(2):78-81. PubMed ID: 24496258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Validating a pain assessment tool in heterogeneous ICU patients: Is it possible?
    Emsden C; Schäfer UB; Denhaerynck K; Grossmann F; Frei IA; Kirsch M
    Nurs Crit Care; 2020 Jan; 25(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 31397952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Validity and reliability of the critical care pain observation tool: a replication study.
    Keane KM
    Pain Manag Nurs; 2013 Dec; 14(4):e216-e225. PubMed ID: 24315275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A preliminary validation of the Swedish version of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool in adults.
    Nürnberg Damström D; Saboonchi F; Sackey PV; Björling G
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2011 Apr; 55(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 21288226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluation of Pain Assessment Tools in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation.
    Al Darwish ZQ; Hamdi R; Fallatah S
    AACN Adv Crit Care; 2016; 27(2):162-72. PubMed ID: 27153305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Validation of the patient State Index for monitoring sedation state in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study.
    Idei M; Seino Y; Sato N; Yoshida T; Saishu Y; Fukui K; Iwabuchi M; Ishikawa J; Ota K; Kamei D; Nakagawa M; Nomura T
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2023 Feb; 37(1):147-154. PubMed ID: 35661319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Validation of the Italian version of the Critical Pain Observation Tool in brain-injured critically ill adults.
    Sulla F; De Souza Ramos N; Terzi N; Trenta T; Uneddu M; Zaldivar Cruces MA; Sarli L
    Acta Biomed; 2017 Nov; 88(5S):48-54. PubMed ID: 29189705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Validation of Two Pain Assessment Tools Using a Standardized Nociceptive Stimulation in Critically Ill Adults.
    Klein C; Caumo W; Gélinas C; Patines V; Pilger T; Lopes A; Backes FN; Villas-Boas DF; Vieira SRR
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2018 Oct; 56(4):594-601. PubMed ID: 30009967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. To assess patients pain in intensive care: developing and testing the Swedish version of the Behavioural Pain Scale.
    Hylén M; Alm-Roijer C; Idvall E; Akerman E
    Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2019 Jun; 52():28-34. PubMed ID: 30826170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool in brain-injured critically ill adults.
    Joffe AM; McNulty B; Boitor M; Marsh R; Gélinas C
    J Crit Care; 2016 Dec; 36():76-80. PubMed ID: 27546751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Utilization of Behavioral Pain Scale and Critical Care Pain Observation Tool for pain evaluation in Intensive Care Unit].
    Elli S; Dagostini G; Bambi S; Rezoagli E; Cannizzo L; Pasquali S; Colnaghi G; Lucchini A
    Prof Inferm; 2015; 68(4):228-35. PubMed ID: 26752314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The minimal clinically important difference of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale in patients with cancer with agitated delirium.
    Hui D; Hess K; Dibaj SS; Arthur J; Dev R; Dalal S; Reddy S; Bruera E
    Cancer; 2018 May; 124(10):2246-2252. PubMed ID: 29469951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.