BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28927778)

  • 1. Introducing nerve-sparing approach during minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for locally-advanced cervical cancer: A multi-institutional experience.
    Raspagliesi F; Bogani G; Spinillo A; Ditto A; Bogliolo S; Casarin J; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Martinelli F; Signorelli M; Gardella B; Chiappa V; Scaffa C; Ferrero S; Cromi A; Lorusso D; Ghezzi F
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Nov; 43(11):2150-2156. PubMed ID: 28927778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nerve-Sparing Approach Improves Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Bogani G; Rossetti DO; Ditto A; Signorelli M; Martinelli F; Mosca L; Scaffa C; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Chiappa V; Sabatucci I; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(3):402-410. PubMed ID: 29191471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally invasive surgery improves short-term outcomes of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer: a propensity-matched analysis with open abdominal surgery.
    Bogani G; Rossetti D; Ditto A; Martinelli F; Chiappa V; Leone C; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Mar; 30(2):e27. PubMed ID: 30740958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nerve-sparing approach reduces sexual dysfunction in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
    Bogani G; Serati M; Nappi R; Cromi A; di Naro E; Ghezzi F
    J Sex Med; 2014 Dec; 11(12):3012-20. PubMed ID: 25244064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
    Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nerve-sparing versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a minimum 12 months' follow-up study.
    Bogani G; Cromi A; Uccella S; Serati M; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Nardelli F; Ghezzi F
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 May; 24(4):787-93. PubMed ID: 24552894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a multi-institutional cohort study.
    Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Ditto A; Vizza E; Malzoni M; Raspagliesi F; Uccella S; Corrado G; Cosentino F; Gotsch F; Martinelli F; Franchi M
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):2007-15. PubMed ID: 23224830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    Liu Z; Li X; Li W; Yang Y; Tao Y; Yao Y
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Nov; 131(2):152-5. PubMed ID: 26294170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minilaparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: multi-institutional experience in comparison with conventional laparoscopy.
    Ghezzi F; Fanfani F; Malzoni M; Uccella S; Fagotti A; Cosentino F; Cromi A; Scambia G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1094-100. PubMed ID: 23948703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy in Women With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Single-institution Experience of Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes.
    Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Cárdenas-Rebollo JM; Achilarre MT; Garbi A; Patrono MG; Colombo N; Maggioni A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):909-16. PubMed ID: 27158094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrospective comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Cai J; Yang L; Dong W; Wang H; Xiong Z; Wang Z
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jan; 132(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 26434669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implementation of laparoscopic approach for type B radical hysterectomy: a comparison with open surgical operations.
    Ditto A; Martinelli F; Bogani G; Gasparri ML; Di Donato V; Zanaboni F; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 25468458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term oncological outcomes of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A retrospective, single-institutional study in the wake of the LACC trial.
    Kanno K; Andou M; Yanai S; Toeda M; Nimura R; Ichikawa F; Teishikata Y; Shirane T; Sakate S; Kihira T; Hamasaki Y; Sawada M; Shirane A; Ota Y
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2425-2434. PubMed ID: 31502349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Liu Z; Li X; Tao Y; Li W; Yang Y; Yao Y; Zhu T
    Int J Surg; 2016 Jan; 25():54-8. PubMed ID: 26632655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patterns of recurrence after laparoscopic versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Bogani G; Ghezzi F; Chiva L; Gisone B; Pinelli C; Dell'Acqua A; Casarin J; Ditto A; Raspagliesi F
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jul; 30(7):987-992. PubMed ID: 32448809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nerve-sparing minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer patients.
    Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Uccella S; Bogani G; Sturla D; Serati M; Bolis P
    Surg Innov; 2013 Oct; 20(5):493-501. PubMed ID: 23339145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by robotic radical hysterectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a multi-institution study.
    Vizza E; Corrado G; Zanagnolo V; Tomaselli T; Cutillo G; Mancini E; Maggioni A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 May; 133(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 24589412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Laparoscopic anatomical nerve sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a clinical analysis of 37 cases].
    Chen Y; Li Y; Xu HC; Li JN; Li YY; Liang ZQ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 May; 44(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 19573312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ten-year outcomes following laparoscopic and open abdominal radical hysterectomy for "low-risk" early-stage cervical cancer: A propensity-score based analysis.
    Di Donato V; Bogani G; Casarin J; Ghezzi F; Malzoni M; Falcone F; Petrillo M; Capobianco G; Calò F; D'Augè TG; Muzii L; Benedetti Panici P; Ervas E; Ditto A; Raspagliesi F; Sopracordevole F; Vizza E; Giannini A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Jul; 174():49-54. PubMed ID: 37149905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incorporating 3D laparoscopy for the management of locally advanced cervical cancer: a comparison with open surgery.
    Raspagliesi F; Bogani G; Martinelli F; Signorelli M; Chiappa V; Scaffa C; Sabatucci I; Adorni M; Lorusso D; Ditto A
    Tumori; 2016 Aug; 102(4):393-7. PubMed ID: 27373783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.