These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28928564)

  • 1. Comparison of i-gel™ and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ in Different Head and Neck Positions in Spontaneously Breathing Pediatric Population.
    Gupta S; Dogra N; Chauhan K
    Anesth Essays Res; 2017; 11(3):647-650. PubMed ID: 28928564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of I-gel™ airway in different head and neck positions in anesthetized paralyzed children.
    Jain D; Ghai B; Bala I; Gandhi K; Banerjee G
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2015 Dec; 25(12):1248-53. PubMed ID: 26383088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of LMA Supreme™ with i-gel™ and LMA ProSeal™ in children for airway management during general anaesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Bhattacharjee S; Som A; Maitra S
    J Clin Anesth; 2017 Sep; 41():5-10. PubMed ID: 28802606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of air-Q™, i-gel™, and laryngeal mask airway supreme™ in adult patients during general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.
    Damodaran S; Sethi S; Malhotra SK; Samra T; Maitra S; Saini V
    Saudi J Anaesth; 2017; 11(4):390-395. PubMed ID: 29033717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized crossover study assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure and fiber optic positioning : Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ versus Laryngeal Tube LTS II™ size 2 in non-paralyzed anesthetized children.
    Gasteiger L; Ofner S; Stögermüller B; Ziegler B; Brimacombe J; Keller C
    Anaesthesist; 2016 Aug; 65(8):585-9. PubMed ID: 27380049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pediatric supraglottic airway devices in clinical practice: A prospective observational study.
    Kleine-Brueggeney M; Gottfried A; Nabecker S; Greif R; Book M; Theiler L
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):119. PubMed ID: 28865448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of i-gel™ and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ during general anesthesia in infants.
    Lee YC; Yoon KS; Park SY; Choi SR; Chung CJ
    Korean J Anesthesiol; 2018 Feb; 71(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 29441173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laryngeal mask airway protector generates higher oropharyngeal leak pressures compared to the laryngeal mask airway supreme: A randomized clinical trial in the ambulatory surgery unit.
    Acx E; Van Caelenberg E; De Baerdemaeker L; Coppens M
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2021; 37(2):221-225. PubMed ID: 34349370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Device stability and quality of ventilation of classic laryngeal mask airway versus AIR-Q and I-gel at different head and neck positions in anesthetized spontaneously breathing children.
    Abdel-Ghaffar HS; Abdelal FA; Osman MA; Soliman OM
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2020 Mar; 86(3):286-294. PubMed ID: 31922375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomized comparison of the i-gel™, the LMA Supreme™, and the Laryngeal Tube Suction-D using clinical and fibreoptic assessments in elective patients.
    Russo SG; Cremer S; Galli T; Eich C; Bräuer A; Crozier TA; Bauer M; Strack M
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2012 Aug; 12():18. PubMed ID: 22871204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with the I-Gel™ in the different head-and-neck positions in anaesthetised paralysed children: A randomised controlled trial.
    Banerjee G; Jain D; Bala I; Gandhi K; Samujh R
    Indian J Anaesth; 2018 Feb; 62(2):103-108. PubMed ID: 29491514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Head Rotation Reduces Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure of the i-gel and LMA® Supreme™ in Paralyzed, Anesthetized Patients: A Randomized Trial.
    Chaki T; Tachibana S; Kumita S; Sato H; Hamada K; Tokinaga Y; Yamakage M
    Anesth Analg; 2021 Mar; 132(3):818-826. PubMed ID: 32889846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position with the flexible and the standard laryngeal mask airway.
    Keller C; Brimacombe J
    Anesth Analg; 1999 Apr; 88(4):913-6. PubMed ID: 10195547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the performance of the I-gel™ vs. the LMA-S™during anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Chen X; Jiao J; Cong X; Liu L; Wu X
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e71910. PubMed ID: 23951266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective, randomized comparison of the LMA-protector™ and i-gel™ in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.
    Chang JE; Kim H; Lee JM; Min SW; Won D; Jun K; Hwang JY
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):118. PubMed ID: 31272379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of i-gel™ and LMA Supreme™ in anesthetized and paralyzed children.
    Kim H; Lee JY; Lee SY; Park SY; Lee SC; Chung CJ
    Korean J Anesthesiol; 2014 Nov; 67(5):317-22. PubMed ID: 25473460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Observation of ventilation effects of I-gel™, Supreme™ and Ambu AuraOnce™ with respiratory dynamics monitoring in small children.
    Gu Z; Jin Q; Liu J; Chen L
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Oct; 31(5):1035-1041. PubMed ID: 27492428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Oropharyngeal leak pressure of the LMA Protector™ vs the LMA Supreme™; a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Moser B; Keller C; Audigé L; Bruppacher HR
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2019 Mar; 63(3):322-328. PubMed ID: 30229857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stability of the LMA-ProSeal and standard laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions: a randomized crossover study.
    Brimacombe J; Keller C
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2003 Jan; 20(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 12553391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnetic resonance imaging study of the in vivo position of the extraglottic airway devices i-gel™ and LMA-Supreme™ in anaesthetized human volunteers.
    Russo SG; Cremer S; Eich C; Jipp M; Cohnen J; Strack M; Quintel M; Mohr A
    Br J Anaesth; 2012 Dec; 109(6):996-1004. PubMed ID: 23015619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.