These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28928564)
41. Directly measured mucosal pressures produced by the i-gel™ and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ in paralysed anaesthetised patients. Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Kaufmann M; Keller C; Tiefenthaler W Anaesthesia; 2012 Apr; 67(4):407-10. PubMed ID: 22324968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Randomized comparison of the Baska FESS mask and the LMA Supreme in different head and neck positions. Foo LL; Shariffuddin II; Chaw SH; Lee PK; Lee CE; Chen YS; Chan L Expert Rev Med Devices; 2018 Aug; 15(8):597-603. PubMed ID: 30095289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Flexion compromises ventilation with the laryngeal tube suction II in children. Kim JT; Na HS; Bae JY; Kim HJ; Shin HY; Kim HS; Kim CS; Kim SD Paediatr Anaesth; 2009 Feb; 19(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 19143960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A randomised, non-crossover study of the GuardianCPV Laryngeal Mask versus the LMA Supreme in paralysed, anaesthetised female patients. Tiefenthaler W; Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Fricke E; Keller C; Kaufmann M Anaesthesia; 2013 Jun; 68(6):600-4. PubMed ID: 23550791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Conditions for laryngeal mask airway placement in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure: a comparison between blind insertion and laryngoscope-guided insertion. Kim GW; Kim JY; Kim SJ; Moon YR; Park EJ; Park SY BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):4. PubMed ID: 30611202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A comparison of supraglottic airway i-gel™ vs. classic laryngeal mask airway in small children. Lee JH; Cho HS; Shin WJ; Yang HS Korean J Anesthesiol; 2014 Feb; 66(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 24624270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A randomized comparative study of three supraglottic airway devices for controlled ventilation in anesthetized patients. Sharma M; Sharma B; Gupta M; Panday BC; Sahai C; Sood J J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2022; 38(2):221-227. PubMed ID: 36171925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ at different intracuff pressures: a randomized controlled trial. Zhang L; Seet E; Mehta V; Subramanyam R; Ankichetty SP; Wong DT; Chung F Can J Anaesth; 2011 Jul; 58(7):624-629. PubMed ID: 21533663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Assessment of Success and Ease of Insertion of ProSeal™ Laryngeal Mask Airway versus I-gel™ Insertion by Paramedics in Simulated Difficult Airway Using Cervical Collar in Different Positions in Manikins. Gupta A; Kabi A; Gaur D Anesth Essays Res; 2020; 14(4):627-631. PubMed ID: 34349332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparison of the LMA Supreme™ with the LMA Proseal™ for airway management in patients anaesthetized in prone position. López AM; Valero R; Hurtado P; Gambús P; Pons M; Anglada T Br J Anaesth; 2011 Aug; 107(2):265-71. PubMed ID: 21576096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Fiberoptic intubation of severely obese patients through supraglottic airway: A prospective, randomized trial of the Ambu Moser B; Keller C; Audigé L; Dave MH; Bruppacher HR Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2019 Feb; 63(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 30088266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Reduced air leakage by adjusting the cuff pressure in pediatric laryngeal mask airways during spontaneous ventilation. Hockings L; Heaney M; Chambers NA; Erb TO; von Ungern-Sternberg BS Paediatr Anaesth; 2010 Apr; 20(4):313-7. PubMed ID: 20470334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure between the Ambu® AuraGain™ and the LMA® Supreme™ supraglottic airways: a randomized-controlled trial. Wong DT; Ooi A; Singh KP; Dallaire A; Meliana V; Lau J; Chung F; Singh M; Wong J Can J Anaesth; 2018 Jul; 65(7):797-805. PubMed ID: 29582360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Effects of Peak Inspiratory Pressure-Guided Setting of Intracuff Pressure for Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ Use during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Wang MH; Zhang DS; Zhou W; Tian SP; Zhou TQ; Sui W; Zhang Z J Invest Surg; 2021 Oct; 34(10):1137-1144. PubMed ID: 32354298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparison of the Supreme and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Anand LK; Goel N; Singh M; Kapoor D Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2016 Jun; 54(2):44-50. PubMed ID: 27106162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Flexion decreases the ventilation quality of the Ambu Lee JH; Jang YE; Kim EH; Kim HS; Kim JT Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2018 Sep; 62(8):1080-1085. PubMed ID: 29797717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparison of i-gel™ and laryngeal mask airway Classic™ in terms of ease of insertion and hemodynamic response: A randomized observational study. Pratheeba N; Ramya GS; Ranjan RV; Remadevi R Anesth Essays Res; 2016; 10(3):521-525. PubMed ID: 27746545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The effect of a cervical collar on the seal pressure of the LMA Supreme™: a prospective, crossover trial. Mann V; Spitzner T; Schwandner T; Mann ST; Müller M; Ahlbrandt J; Weigand MA; Röhrig R Anaesthesia; 2012 Nov; 67(11):1260-5. PubMed ID: 22881293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The influence of mouth opening on oropharyngeal leak pressure, intracuff pressure, and cuff position with the laryngeal mask airway. Sanuki T; Sugioka S; Hirokane M; Son H; Uda R; Akatsuka M; Kotani J J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 May; 68(5):1038-42. PubMed ID: 20223572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Brief review: The LMA Supreme™ supraglottic airway. Wong DT; Yang JJ; Jagannathan N Can J Anaesth; 2012 May; 59(5):483-93. PubMed ID: 22318376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]