These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28928728)

  • 1. Comparative Analysis of the Gut Microbiota Composition between Captive and Wild Forest Musk Deer.
    Li Y; Hu X; Yang S; Zhou J; Zhang T; Qi L; Sun X; Fan M; Xu S; Cha M; Zhang M; Lin S; Liu S; Hu D
    Front Microbiol; 2017; 8():1705. PubMed ID: 28928728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative analysis of gut microbial composition and potential functions in captive forest and alpine musk deer.
    Jiang F; Song P; Wang H; Zhang J; Liu D; Cai Z; Gao H; Chi X; Zhang T
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2022 Feb; 106(3):1325-1339. PubMed ID: 35037997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marked variations in gut microbial diversity, functions, and disease risk between wild and captive alpine musk deer.
    Jiang F; Song P; Liu D; Zhang J; Qin W; Wang H; Liang C; Gao H; Zhang T
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2023 Sep; 107(17):5517-5529. PubMed ID: 37421471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marked Seasonal Variation in Structure and Function of Gut Microbiota in Forest and Alpine Musk Deer.
    Jiang F; Gao H; Qin W; Song P; Wang H; Zhang J; Liu D; Wang D; Zhang T
    Front Microbiol; 2021; 12():699797. PubMed ID: 34552569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in Gut Microbiota Composition Associated with the Presence of Enteric Protist
    Deng L; Chen S; Meng W; Zhou Z; Liu H; Zhong Z; Fu H; Shen L; Cao S; Tan KSW; Peng G
    Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Aug; 10(4):e0226921. PubMed ID: 35736237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative Analysis of the Gut Microbial Communities in Forest and Alpine Musk Deer Using High-Throughput Sequencing.
    Hu X; Liu G; Shafer ABA; Wei Y; Zhou J; Lin S; Wu H; Zhou M; Hu D; Liu S
    Front Microbiol; 2017; 8():572. PubMed ID: 28421061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the gut microbiota composition between wild and captive sika deer (Cervus nippon hortulorum) from feces by high-throughput sequencing.
    Guan Y; Yang H; Han S; Feng L; Wang T; Ge J
    AMB Express; 2017 Nov; 7(1):212. PubMed ID: 29170893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative study of the function and structure of the gut microbiota in Siberian musk deer and Forest musk deer.
    Su R; Dalai M; Luvsantseren B; Chimedtseren C; Hasi S
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2022 Oct; 106(19-20):6799-6817. PubMed ID: 36100751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic changes in intestinal microbiota in young forest musk deer during weaning.
    Li Y; Shi M; Zhang T; Hu X; Zhang B; Xu S; Ding J; Hu D; Liu S
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e8923. PubMed ID: 32322440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis on Changes and Influencing Factors of the Intestinal Microbiota of Alpine Musk Deer between the Place of Origin and Migration.
    Zhang B; Shi M; Xu S; Zhang H; Li Y; Hu D
    Animals (Basel); 2023 Dec; 13(24):. PubMed ID: 38136828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison Between the Fecal Bacterial Microbiota of Healthy and Diarrheic Captive Musk Deer.
    Li Y; Hu X; Yang S; Zhou J; Qi L; Sun X; Fan M; Xu S; Cha M; Zhang M; Lin S; Liu S; Hu D
    Front Microbiol; 2018; 9():300. PubMed ID: 29551996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in the gut microbiota of forest musk deer (
    Jiang Y; Han X; Li M; Feng N; Yang P; Zhao H; Zhang C; Shi M; Huang Z; Sun R; Liu S; Hu D
    Front Microbiol; 2022; 13():969593. PubMed ID: 36160192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gut Microbiota of Wild and Captive Alpine Musk Deer (
    Sun Y; Sun Y; Shi Z; Liu Z; Zhao C; Lu T; Gao H; Zhu F; Chen R; Zhang J; Pan R; Li B; Teng L; Guo S
    Front Microbiol; 2019; 10():3156. PubMed ID: 32038587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of compound probiotics on the weight, immunity performance and fecal microbiota of forest musk deer.
    Liu X; Zhao W; Yu D; Cheng JG; Luo Y; Wang Y; Yang ZX; Yao XP; Wu SS; Wang WY; Yang W; Li DQ; Wu YM
    Sci Rep; 2019 Dec; 9(1):19146. PubMed ID: 31844127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High-Throughput Analysis Reveals Seasonal Variation of the Gut Microbiota Composition Within Forest Musk Deer (
    Hu X; Liu G; Li Y; Wei Y; Lin S; Liu S; Zheng Y; Hu D
    Front Microbiol; 2018; 9():1674. PubMed ID: 30093891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microbiota Changes in the Musk Gland of Male Forest Musk Deer During Musk Maturation.
    Li Y; Zhang T; Qi L; Yang S; Xu S; Cha M; Zhang M; Huang Z; Yu J; Hu D; Liu S
    Front Microbiol; 2018; 9():3048. PubMed ID: 30619139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gut Microbiome of Chinese Forest Musk Deer Examined across Gender and Age.
    Zhao G; Ma T; Tang W; Li D; Mishra SK; Xu Z; Wang Q; Jie H
    Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():9291216. PubMed ID: 31886268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of the Gut Microbiome of Wild and Captive Père David's Deer.
    Sun CH; Liu HY; Liu B; Yuan BD; Lu CH
    Front Microbiol; 2019; 10():2331. PubMed ID: 31636626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. mtDNA CR Evidence Indicates High Genetic Diversity of Captive Forest Musk Deer in Shaanxi Province, China.
    Wang Z; Lu G; Gao Y; Yan L; Li M; Hu D; Zhang D
    Animals (Basel); 2023 Jul; 13(13):. PubMed ID: 37443989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The musk chemical composition and microbiota of Chinese forest musk deer males.
    Li D; Chen B; Zhang L; Gaur U; Ma T; Jie H; Zhao G; Wu N; Xu Z; Xu H; Yao Y; Lian T; Fan X; Yang D; Yang M; Zhu Q; Satkoski Trask J
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jan; 6():18975. PubMed ID: 26744067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.