These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28928993)

  • 21. Identification of mosaic and segmental aneuploidies by next-generation sequencing in preimplantation genetic screening can improve clinical outcomes compared to array-comparative genomic hybridization.
    Lai HH; Chuang TH; Wong LK; Lee MJ; Hsieh CL; Wang HL; Chen SU
    Mol Cytogenet; 2017; 10():14. PubMed ID: 28450889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A prospective pilot study comparing fertilization and embryo development between fresh and vitrified sibling oocytes.
    Siano L; Engmann L; Nulsen J; Benadiva C
    Conn Med; 2013 Apr; 77(4):211-7. PubMed ID: 23691734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The accumulation of vitrified oocytes is a strategy to increase the number of euploid available blastocysts for transfer after preimplantation genetic testing.
    Chamayou S; Sicali M; Alecci C; Ragolia C; Liprino A; Nibali D; Storaci G; Cardea A; Guglielmino A
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Apr; 34(4):479-486. PubMed ID: 28070710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cumulus cell transcriptome profiling is not predictive of live birth after in vitro fertilization: a paired analysis of euploid sibling blastocysts.
    Green KA; Franasiak JM; Werner MD; Tao X; Landis JN; Scott RT; Treff NR
    Fertil Steril; 2018 Mar; 109(3):460-466.e2. PubMed ID: 29428306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mitochondrial DNA as a biomarker for in-vitro fertilization outcome.
    Seli E
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 28(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 27077472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Vitrification of in vitro matured oocytes diminishes embryo development potential before but not after embryo genomic activation.
    Sun Y; Gu R; Lu X; Zhao S; Feng Y
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Feb; 33(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 26685678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mitochondrial DNA copy number in cumulus granulosa cells as a predictor for embryo morphokinetics and chromosome status.
    Rahmawati P; Wiweko B; Boediono A
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2023 Apr; 69(2):101-111. PubMed ID: 36426586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Worth the wait? Day 7 blastocysts have lower euploidy rates but similar sustained implantation rates as Day 5 and Day 6 blastocysts.
    Tiegs AW; Sun L; Patounakis G; Scott RT
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1632-1639. PubMed ID: 31402381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of the male factor on the clinical outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection combined with preimplantation aneuploidy testing: observational longitudinal cohort study of 1,219 consecutive cycles.
    Mazzilli R; Cimadomo D; Vaiarelli A; Capalbo A; Dovere L; Alviggi E; Dusi L; Foresta C; Lombardo F; Lenzi A; Tournaye H; Alviggi C; Rienzi L; Ubaldi FM
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Dec; 108(6):961-972.e3. PubMed ID: 28985908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autologous in vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility preservation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval.
    Doyle JO; Richter KS; Lim J; Stillman RJ; Graham JR; Tucker MJ
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):459-66.e2. PubMed ID: 26604065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of maternal age on euploidy rates in a large cohort of embryos analyzed with 24-chromosome single-nucleotide polymorphism-based preimplantation genetic screening.
    Demko ZP; Simon AL; McCoy RC; Petrov DA; Rabinowitz M
    Fertil Steril; 2016 May; 105(5):1307-1313. PubMed ID: 26868992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Optimal euploid embryo transfer strategy, fresh versus frozen, after preimplantation genetic screening with next generation sequencing: a randomized controlled trial.
    Coates A; Kung A; Mounts E; Hesla J; Bankowski B; Barbieri E; Ata B; Cohen J; Munné S
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Mar; 107(3):723-730.e3. PubMed ID: 28139240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A systematic analysis of the suitability of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for mitochondrial diseases in a heteroplasmic mitochondrial mouse model.
    Neupane J; Vandewoestyne M; Heindryckx B; Ghimire S; Lu Y; Qian C; Lierman S; Van Coster R; Gerris J; Deroo T; Deforce D; De Sutter P
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Apr; 29(4):852-9. PubMed ID: 24524987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Characterizing nuclear and mitochondrial DNA in spent embryo culture media: genetic contamination identified.
    Hammond ER; McGillivray BC; Wicker SM; Peek JC; Shelling AN; Stone P; Chamley LW; Cree LM
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Jan; 107(1):220-228.e5. PubMed ID: 27865449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Chromosome constitution of human embryos generated after in vitro maturation including 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine in the oocyte collection medium.
    Spits C; Guzman L; Mertzanidou A; Jacobs K; Ortega-Hrepich C; Gilchrist RB; Thompson JG; De Vos M; Smitz J; Sermon K
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Mar; 30(3):653-63. PubMed ID: 25475586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?
    Drakopoulos P; Blockeel C; Stoop D; Camus M; de Vos M; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):370-6. PubMed ID: 26724797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Embryonal mitochondrial DNA: relationship to embryo quality and transfer outcomes.
    Klimczak AM; Pacheco LE; Lewis KE; Massahi N; Richards JP; Kearns WG; Saad AF; Crochet JR
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 May; 35(5):871-877. PubMed ID: 29508122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The cytogenetic constitution of embryos derived from immature (metaphase I) oocytes obtained after ovarian hyperstimulation.
    Strassburger D; Goldstein A; Friedler S; Raziel A; Kasterstein E; Mashevich M; Schachter M; Ron-El R; Reish O
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Aug; 94(3):971-8. PubMed ID: 19505687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Proof of concept: preimplantation genetic screening without embryo biopsy through analysis of cell-free DNA in spent embryo culture media.
    Shamonki MI; Jin H; Haimowitz Z; Liu L
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Nov; 106(6):1312-1318. PubMed ID: 27565258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Why do euploid embryos miscarry? A case-control study comparing the rate of aneuploidy within presumed euploid embryos that resulted in miscarriage or live birth using next-generation sequencing.
    Maxwell SM; Colls P; Hodes-Wertz B; McCulloh DH; McCaffrey C; Wells D; Munné S; Grifo JA
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Nov; 106(6):1414-1419.e5. PubMed ID: 27692437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.