These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28929372)

  • 1. Clinical equivalence with G-CSF biosimilars: methodologic approach in a (neo)adjuvant setting in non-metastatic breast cancer.
    Krendyukov A; Schiestl M; Höbel N; Aapro M
    Support Care Cancer; 2018 Jan; 26(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 28929372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Comparison of Proposed Biosimilar LA-EP2006 and Reference Pegfilgrastim for the Prevention of Neutropenia in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer Receiving Myelosuppressive Adjuvant or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Pegfilgrastim Randomized Oncology (Supportive Care) Trial to Evaluate Comparative Treatment (PROTECT-2), a Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.
    Blackwell K; Donskih R; Jones CM; Nixon A; Vidal MJ; Nakov R; Singh P; Schaffar G; Gascón P; Harbeck N
    Oncologist; 2016 Jul; 21(7):789-94. PubMed ID: 27091420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing granulocyte colony-stimulating factor filgrastim and pegfilgrastim to its biosimilars in terms of efficacy and safety: A meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials in breast cancer patients.
    Botteri E; Krendyukov A; Curigliano G
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Jan; 89():49-55. PubMed ID: 29227817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safety Profile of Biosimilar Filgrastim (Zarzio/Zarxio): A Combined Analysis of Phase III Studies.
    Harbeck N; Gascón P; Krendyukov A; Hoebel N; Gattu S; Blackwell K
    Oncologist; 2018 Apr; 23(4):403-409. PubMed ID: 29317553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of EP2006, a filgrastim biosimilar, to the reference: a phase III, randomized, double-blind clinical study in the prevention of severe neutropenia in patients with breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
    Blackwell K; Semiglazov V; Krasnozhon D; Davidenko I; Nelyubina L; Nakov R; Stiegler G; Singh P; Schwebig A; Kramer S; Harbeck N
    Ann Oncol; 2015 Sep; 26(9):1948-1953. PubMed ID: 26122726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized, double-blind study comparing proposed biosimilar LA-EP2006 with reference pegfilgrastim in breast cancer.
    Harbeck N; Lipatov O; Frolova M; Udovitsa D; Topuzov E; Ganea-Motan DE; Nakov R; Singh P; Rudy A; Blackwell K
    Future Oncol; 2016 Jun; 12(11):1359-67. PubMed ID: 27020170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pooled analysis of two randomized, double-blind trials comparing proposed biosimilar LA-EP2006 with reference pegfilgrastim in breast cancer.
    Blackwell K; Gascon P; Jones CM; Nixon A; Krendyukov A; Nakov R; Li Y; Harbeck N
    Ann Oncol; 2017 Sep; 28(9):2272-2277. PubMed ID: 28637287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety and efficacy of alternating treatment with EP2006, a filgrastim biosimilar, and reference filgrastim: a phase III, randomised, double-blind clinical study in the prevention of severe neutropenia in patients with breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
    Blackwell K; Gascon P; Krendyukov A; Gattu S; Li Y; Harbeck N
    Ann Oncol; 2018 Jan; 29(1):244-249. PubMed ID: 29091995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Proposed biosimilar pegfilgrastim (LA-EP2006) compared with reference pegfilgrastim in Asian patients with breast cancer: an exploratory comparison from two Phase III trials.
    Harbeck N; Gascon P; Jones CM; Nixon A; Krendyukov A; Nakov R; Li Y; Blackwell K
    Future Oncol; 2017 Jul; 13(16):1385-1393. PubMed ID: 28453299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim (Nivestim™), reference Amgen filgrastim and pegfilgrastim in febrile neutropenia primary prevention in breast cancer patients treated with neo(adjuvant) TAC: a non-interventional cohort study.
    Brito M; Esteves S; André R; Isidoro M; Moreira A
    Support Care Cancer; 2016 Feb; 24(2):597-603. PubMed ID: 26111956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biosimilars in oncology: Effects on economy and therapeutic innovations.
    Hübel K; Kron F; Lux MP
    Eur J Cancer; 2020 Nov; 139():10-19. PubMed ID: 32950935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy and safety of two pegfilgrastim biosimilars: Tripegfilgrastim and pegteograstim.
    Kang KW; Lee BH; Jeon MJ; Yu ES; Kim DS; Lee SR; Sung HJ; Choi CW; Park Y; Kim BS
    Cancer Med; 2020 Sep; 9(17):6102-6110. PubMed ID: 32633471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors to prevent febrile neutropenia and related complications in cancer patients in clinical practice: A systematic review.
    Mitchell S; Li X; Woods M; Garcia J; Hebard-Massey K; Barron R; Samuel M
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2016 Oct; 22(5):702-16. PubMed ID: 26769697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-efficiency analysis of conversion to biosimilar filgrastim for supportive cancer care and resultant expanded access analysis to supportive care and early-stage HER2+ breast cancer treatment in Saudi Arabia: simulation study.
    Yousef CC; Khan MA; Almodaimegh H; Alshamrani M; Al-Foheidi M; AlAbdalkarim H; AlJedai A; Naeem A; Abraham I
    J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):394-402. PubMed ID: 36815700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How did the Introduction of Biosimilar Filgrastim Influence the Prescribing Pattern of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factors? Results from a Multicentre, Population-Based Study, from Five Italian Centres in the Years 2009-2014.
    Marcianò I; Ingrasciotta Y; Giorgianni F; Bolcato J; Chinellato A; Pirolo R; Di Giorgio A; Manna S; Ientile V; Gini R; Santarpia M; Genazzani AA; Uomo I; Pastorello M; Pollina Addario SW; Scondotto S; Cananzi P; Da Cas R; Traversa G; Rossi M; Sottosanti L; Caputi AP; Trifirò G
    BioDrugs; 2016 Aug; 30(4):295-306. PubMed ID: 27138636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost comparison of outpatient treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) in Germany.
    Hadji P; Kostev K; Schröder-Bernhardi D; Ziller V
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2012 Apr; 50(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 22456299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. LA-EP2006: A Pegfilgrastim Biosimilar.
    Hoy SM
    BioDrugs; 2019 Apr; 33(2):229-232. PubMed ID: 30887256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) for the prevention of febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients with cancer.
    Aapro MS; Chaplin S; Cornes P; Howe S; Link H; Koptelova N; Mehl A; Di Palma M; Schroader BK; Terkola R
    Support Care Cancer; 2023 Sep; 31(10):581. PubMed ID: 37728795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. G-CSF: filgrastim, lenograstim and biosimilars.
    Welte K
    Expert Opin Biol Ther; 2014 Jul; 14(7):983-93. PubMed ID: 24707817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim vs. original granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in febrile neutropenia prevention in breast cancer patients.
    Puértolas I; Frutos Pérez-Surio A; Alcácera MA; Andrés R; Salvador MDT
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2018 Mar; 74(3):315-321. PubMed ID: 29152672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.