These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Who shall live, who shall die. Who decides? Hirsh HL; Cuneo MK Med Law; 1986; 5(2):111-50. PubMed ID: 3713456 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Court's guidelines on incompetent patients compromise their rights. Connery JR Hosp Prog; 1980 Sep; 61(9):46-9. PubMed ID: 10248004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Constitutional law--can a "life advocate" impair the constitutional right to reject life-prolonging medical treatment?--In re Jobes, 210 N.J.Super. 543, 510 A.2d 133. Armstrong A Cumberland Law Rev; 1986-1987; 17(2):553-68. PubMed ID: 11658968 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Changing Roman Catholic attitudes toward termination of life-sustaining treatments. Hill TP Linacre Q; 1991 May; 58(2):51-9. PubMed ID: 11651024 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Withholding of life-sustaining treatment from the terminally ill, incompetent patient: who decides? Part II. Suber DG; Tabor WJ JAMA; 1982 Nov; 248(19):2431-2. PubMed ID: 7131695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Withholding of life-sustaining treatment from the terminal ill, incompetent patient: who decides? Part I. Suber DG; Tabor WJ JAMA; 1982 Nov; 248(18):2250-1. PubMed ID: 7131676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A review of the ethical and legal aspects of terminating medical care. Emanuel EJ Am J Med; 1988 Feb; 84(2):291-301. PubMed ID: 3044071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. In re Peter. New Jersey. Supreme Court Atl Report; 1987 Jun; 529():419-34. PubMed ID: 11648264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Nancy Cruzan in China. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):39-41. PubMed ID: 2228588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The permanently unconscious patient, non-feeding and euthanasia. Cantor NL Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(4):381-437. PubMed ID: 2517381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Substitute consent. Reconciling negative treatment and consent to routine medical treatment. Sappington GM J Leg Med; 1986 Sep; 7(3):341-55. PubMed ID: 3490528 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Decision making in the care of terminally ill incompetent persons: concerns about the role of the courts. Mariner WK J Am Geriatr Soc; 1984 Oct; 32(10):739-46. PubMed ID: 6481053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Brief and appendix for amicus curiae: the American Geriatrics Society. Lynn J J Am Geriatr Soc; 1984 Dec; 32(12):915-22. PubMed ID: 6512131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Medico-legal implications of "orders not to resuscitate. Tecklenburg N Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1982; 31(3):515-37. PubMed ID: 11649468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Missing persons: legal perceptions of incompetent patients. Dresser R Rutgers Law Rev; 1994; 46(2):609-719. PubMed ID: 11660406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Judges at the bedside: the case of Joseph Saikewicz. Annas GJ Medicoleg News; 1978; 6(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 10289106 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. In re Guardianship of Schiavo. Florida, District Court of Appeal, Second District Wests South Report; 2003; 851():182-7. PubMed ID: 15179948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. In re Quinlan: a synthesis of law and medical technology. Hyland WF; Baime DS Rutgers Camden Law J; 1976; 8(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 11663167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Withdrawal and withholding of life-supporting food and fluids. One state's struggle. Caralis PV J Fla Med Assoc; 1990 Sep; 77(9):821-8. PubMed ID: 2121893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]