196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28930669)
1. A highly specific Escherichia coli qPCR and its comparison with existing methods for environmental waters.
Walker DI; McQuillan J; Taiwo M; Parks R; Stenton CA; Morgan H; Mowlem MC; Lees DN
Water Res; 2017 Dec; 126():101-110. PubMed ID: 28930669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Method for rapid detection of viable Escherichia coli in water using real-time NASBA.
Heijnen L; Medema G
Water Res; 2009 Jul; 43(12):3124-32. PubMed ID: 19476965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of fecal bacteria and source tracking identifiers in environmental waters using rRNA-based RT-qPCR and rDNA-based qPCR assays.
Pitkänen T; Ryu H; Elk M; Hokajärvi AM; Siponen S; Vepsäläinen A; Räsänen P; Santo Domingo JW
Environ Sci Technol; 2013; 47(23):13611-20. PubMed ID: 24187936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Utilizing novel Escherichia coli-specific conserved signature proteins for enhanced monitoring of recreational water quality.
Saleem F; Li E; Tran KL; Rudra B; Edge TA; Schellhorn HE; Gupta RS
Microbiologyopen; 2024 Jun; 13(3):e1410. PubMed ID: 38682792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recombinase polymerase amplification for fast, selective, DNA-based detection of faecal indicator Escherichia coli.
McQuillan JS; Wilson MW
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2021 Apr; 72(4):382-389. PubMed ID: 33175415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of quantitative PCR assays for Escherichia coli targeting ribosomal RNA and single copy genes.
Chern EC; Siefring S; Paar J; Doolittle M; Haugland RA
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2011 Mar; 52(3):298-306. PubMed ID: 21204885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enterococcus and Escherichia coli fecal source apportionment with microbial source tracking genetic markers--is it feasible?
Wang D; Farnleitner AH; Field KG; Green HC; Shanks OC; Boehm AB
Water Res; 2013 Nov; 47(18):6849-61. PubMed ID: 23890872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Qualitative detection of E. coli in distributed drinking water using real-time reverse transcription PCR targeting 16S rRNA: Validation and practical experiences.
Heijnen L; de Vries HJ; van Pelt G; Stroobach E; Atsma A; Vranken J; De Maeyer K; Vissers L; Medema G
Water Res; 2024 Aug; 259():121843. PubMed ID: 38824794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simultaneous quantification of multiple food- and waterborne pathogens by use of microfluidic quantitative PCR.
Ishii S; Segawa T; Okabe S
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2013 May; 79(9):2891-8. PubMed ID: 23435884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Four-Plex Real-Time PCR Assay, Based on rfbE, stx1, stx2, and eae Genes, for the Detection and Quantification of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli O157 in Cattle Feces.
Noll LW; Shridhar PB; Shi X; An B; Cernicchiaro N; Renter DG; Nagaraja TG; Bai J
Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2015 Sep; 12(9):787-94. PubMed ID: 26317538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rapid monitoring of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. in bathing water using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR.
Bergeron P; Oujati H; Catalán Cuenca V; Huguet Mestre JM; Courtois S
Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2011 Nov; 214(6):478-84. PubMed ID: 21917514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Large-scale comparison of E. coli levels determined by culture and a qPCR method (EPA Draft Method C) in Michigan towards the implementation of rapid, multi-site beach testing.
Haugland R; Oshima K; Sivaganesan M; Dufour A; Varma M; Siefring S; Nappier S; Schnitker B; Briggs S
J Microbiol Methods; 2021 May; 184():106186. PubMed ID: 33766609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantification of E. coli O157 and STEC in feces of farm animals using direct multiplex real time PCR (qPCR) and a modified most probable number assay comprised of immunomagnetic bead separation and qPCR detection.
Guy RA; Tremblay D; Beausoleil L; Harel J; Champagne MJ
J Microbiol Methods; 2014 Apr; 99():44-53. PubMed ID: 24530484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Selective detection of viable pathogenic bacteria in water using reverse transcription quantitative PCR].
Lin YW; Li D; Wu SX; He M; Yang T
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2012 Nov; 33(11):4040-5. PubMed ID: 23323443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of real-time PCR for quantitative detection of Escherichia coli in beach water.
Lam JT; Lui E; Chau S; Kueh CS; Yung YK; Yam WC
J Water Health; 2014 Mar; 12(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 24642432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rapid detection of the Escherichia coli genospecies in water by conventional and real-time PCR.
Maheux AF; Bissonnette L; Bergeron MG
Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 943():289-305. PubMed ID: 23104298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Duplex Digital PCR Assay for Simultaneous Quantification of the Enterococcus spp. and the Human Fecal-associated HF183 Marker in Waters.
Cao Y; Raith MR; Griffith JF
J Vis Exp; 2016 Mar; (109):. PubMed ID: 27023488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and application of a quantitative PCR assay targeting Catellicoccus marimammalium for assessing gull-associated fecal contamination at Lake Erie beaches.
Lee C; Marion JW; Lee J
Sci Total Environ; 2013 Jun; 454-455():1-8. PubMed ID: 23542477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SYBR green real time-polymerase chain reaction as a rapid and alternative assay for the efficient identification of all existing Escherichia coli biotypes approved directly in wastewater samples.
Chetta M; Bafunno V; Grillo R; Mele A; Lo Perfido P; Notarnicola M; Cellini F; Cifarelli RA
Biotechnol Prog; 2012 Jul; 28(4):1106-13. PubMed ID: 22730251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of real-time PCR assays and standard curve optimisation for enhanced accuracy in quantification of Campylobacter environmental water isolates.
Gosselin-Théberge M; Taboada E; Guy RA
J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Oct; 129():70-77. PubMed ID: 27485709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
