These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28931867)

  • 1. Accuracy and Reliability of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Linear and Volumetric Mandibular Condyle Measurements. A Human Cadaver Study.
    García-Sanz V; Bellot-Arcís C; Hernández V; Serrano-Sánchez P; Guarinos J; Paredes-Gallardo V
    Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):11993. PubMed ID: 28931867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cone beam computed tomography 3D reconstruction of the mandibular condyle.
    Schlueter B; Kim KB; Oliver D; Sortiropoulos G
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):880-8. PubMed ID: 18298200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Volumetric analysis of the mandibular condyle using cone beam computed tomography.
    Bayram M; Kayipmaz S; Sezgin OS; Küçük M
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):1812-6. PubMed ID: 21680124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of a novel semi-automated method for three-dimensional surface rendering of condyles using cone beam computed tomography data.
    Xi T; van Loon B; Fudalej P; Bergé S; Swennen G; Maal T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Aug; 42(8):1023-9. PubMed ID: 23528746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Appraisal of the Accuracy and Reliability of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Three-Dimensional Printing for Volumetric Mandibular Condyle Measurements of a Human Condyle.
    Elrawdy AM; Amer ME; Algariah AK; Eid MH; Abu-Elsaoud AM; Ghoneim MM
    Cureus; 2023 Oct; 15(10):e46746. PubMed ID: 38022326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of simulated small osseous defects in the mandibular condyle.
    Patel A; Tee BC; Fields H; Jones E; Chaudhry J; Sun Z
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 24485728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography with multislice computed tomography in detection of small osseous condylar defects.
    Jones EM; Papio M; Tee BC; Beck FM; Fields HW; Sun Z
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jul; 150(1):130-9. PubMed ID: 27364215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Maal TJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19583759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study.
    Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel region-growing based semi-automatic segmentation protocol for three-dimensional condylar reconstruction using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
    Xi T; Schreurs R; Heerink WJ; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e111126. PubMed ID: 25401954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: influence of patient scanning position.
    Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Sanderink G
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 19106265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Volumetric Analysis of 700 Mandibular Condyles Based Upon Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Safi AF; Kauke M; Grandoch A; Nickenig HJ; Zöller JE; Kreppel M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 29(2):506-509. PubMed ID: 29215437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes.
    Damstra J; Fourie Z; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jan; 137(1):16.e1-6; discussion 16-7. PubMed ID: 20122425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mandibular condylar dimensions: Correlation between 3D tomography and dried skull measurements.
    Scariot R; Gonsar B; Gill N; Furquim F; Corso PFCL; Trevillato PC; Potluri A; Vieira AR
    Cranio; 2019 May; 37(3):153-158. PubMed ID: 29216797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of linear and angular measurements on three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographic images.
    Moreira CR; Sales MA; Lopes PM; Cavalcanti MG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Sep; 108(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 19386521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Soft tissue coverage on the segmentation accuracy of the 3D surface-rendered model from cone-beam CT.
    Dusseldorp JK; Stamatakis HC; Ren Y
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Apr; 21(3):921-930. PubMed ID: 27206862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull.
    Berco M; Rigali PH; Miner RM; DeLuca S; Anderson NK; Will LA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):17.e1-9; discussion 17-8. PubMed ID: 19577142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of simulated mandibular condyle bone lesions by cone beam computed tomography.
    Marques AP; Perrella A; Arita ES; Pereira MF; Cavalcanti Mde G
    Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(4):467-74. PubMed ID: 21180970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of the Volumetric Asymmetry of the Mandibular Condyles Using CBCT.
    Shetty SR; Al-Bayatti S; AlKawas S; Talaat W; Narasimhan S; Gaballah K; Al-Rawi N; Alsaegh M; Madiyal A; Balan P; Kamath V
    Int Dent J; 2022 Dec; 72(6):797-804. PubMed ID: 35931561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of a 3D CBCT-based protocol for the follow-up of mandibular condyle remodeling.
    Verhelst PJ; Shaheen E; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Van der Cruyssen F; Shujaat S; Coudyzer W; Salmon B; Swennen G; Politis C; Jacobs R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Mar; 49(3):20190364. PubMed ID: 31674794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.