These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28931904)

  • 21. Elimination of collaborative inhibition effect using the Method of Loci.
    Saraiva M; Albuquerque PB; Arantes J
    Psicothema; 2016 May; 28(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 27112816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mutual inhibition in collaborative recall: evidence for a retrieval-based account.
    Finlay F; Hitch GJ; Meudell PR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Nov; 26(6):1556-67. PubMed ID: 11185782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Collaborative recall of details of an emotional film.
    Wessel I; Zandstra AR; Hengeveld HM; Moulds ML
    Memory; 2015; 23(3):437-44. PubMed ID: 24628679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Consensus collaboration enhances group and individual recall accuracy.
    Harris CB; Barnier AJ; Sutton J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(1):179-94. PubMed ID: 21939368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Children's collaborative recall of shared and unshared information.
    Gummerum M; Leman PJ; Hollins TS
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2013 Sep; 31(Pt 3):302-17. PubMed ID: 23901844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of information distribution on collaborative inhibition.
    Meade ML; Gigone D
    Memory; 2011 Jul; 19(5):417-28. PubMed ID: 21714744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of group and individual remembering: does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies?
    Basden BH; Basden DR; Bryner S; Thomas RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Sep; 23(5):1176-91. PubMed ID: 9293628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Collaborative memory and part-set cueing impairments: the role of executive depletion in modulating retrieval disruption.
    Barber SJ; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2011 May; 19(4):378-97. PubMed ID: 21678155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Collaboration and prospective memory: comparing nominal and collaborative group performance in strangers and couples.
    Browning CA; Harris CB; Van Bergen P; Barnier AJ; Rendell PG
    Memory; 2018 Oct; 26(9):1206-1219. PubMed ID: 29388873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Neurocognitive mechanisms of collaborative recall.
    Montoro-Membila N; Maswood R; Molina B; Rajaram S; Bajo T
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2022 Sep; 193():107639. PubMed ID: 35598824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Remembering with a friend or a stranger: comparing acquainted and unacquainted pairs in collaborative eyewitness interviews.
    Vredeveldt A; van Deuren S; van Koppen PJ
    Memory; 2019 Nov; 27(10):1390-1403. PubMed ID: 31500512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Inhibitory Process of Collaborative Inhibition: Assessment Using an Emotional Stroop Task.
    Zhang H; Zhang X; Liu X; Yang H; Shi J
    Psychol Rep; 2020 Apr; 123(2):300-324. PubMed ID: 30428267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of the timing and identity of retrieval cues in individual recall: an attempt to mimic cross-cueing in collaborative recall.
    Andersson J; Hitch G; Meudell P
    Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 16423746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effects of collaboration on recall of social information.
    Reysen MB; Talbert NG; Dominko M; Jones AN; Kelley MR
    Br J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 102(3):646-61. PubMed ID: 21752012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The joint influence of collaboration and part-set cueing.
    Kelley MR; Pentz C; Reysen MB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):1977-85. PubMed ID: 24460096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Enhancing the comparability between part-list cueing and collaborative recall: a gradual part-list cueing paradigm.
    Garrido MV; Garcia-Marques L; Hamilton DL
    Exp Psychol; 2012; 59(4):199-205. PubMed ID: 22411179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Conflict and metacognitive control: the mismatch-monitoring hypothesis of how others' knowledge states affect recall.
    Fraundorf SH; Benjamin AS
    Memory; 2016 Sep; 24(8):1108-22. PubMed ID: 26247369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Expertise promotes facilitation on a collaborative memory task.
    Meade ML; Nokes TJ; Morrow DG
    Memory; 2009 Jan; 17(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 19105086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Collaborative remembering of emotional autobiographical memories: Implications for emotion regulation and collective memory.
    Maswood R; Rasmussen AS; Rajaram S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Jan; 148(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 30211580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Collective memory: Collaborative recall synchronizes what and how people remember.
    Greeley GD; Rajaram S
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2023; 14(4):e1641. PubMed ID: 36635944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.