These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28932810)
1. Editorial: Transparency Must Prevail. Bernard C eNeuro; 2017; 4(5):. PubMed ID: 28932810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reducing the costs of peer review. Nat Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 11(4):375. PubMed ID: 18368038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Open review and the quest for increased transparency in neuroscience publication. Foxe JJ; Bolam P Eur J Neurosci; 2017 May; 45(9):1125-1126. PubMed ID: 28186675 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. How does peer review work? Aaron L Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Peer review: does it work? Nahai F Aesthet Surg J; 2010 Jan; 30(1):110-1. PubMed ID: 20442084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Peer review under the microscope: an editor's view. Chan DL J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2011 Oct; 21(5):453-7. PubMed ID: 22316192 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [The manuscripts' review process in Revista Médica de Chile and its peer-reviewers during the year 2012]. Reyes B H; Andresen H M; Palma H J Rev Med Chil; 2013 Jul; 141(7):903-8. PubMed ID: 24356739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Increasing challenges for an effective peer-review process. Hak DJ; Giannoudis P; Mauffrey C Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Feb; 26(2):117-8. PubMed ID: 26724808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Conducting a Peer Review: Novice or Expert. Brandon D; McGrath JM Adv Neonatal Care; 2015 Dec; 15(6):365-6. PubMed ID: 26594793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Our editorial process--some experiences and reflections. Emmelin M; Wall S Scand J Public Health; 2003; 31(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 12850969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Editorial: premature publishing and over-fragmentation. Tarzia G ChemMedChem; 2013 Jan; 8(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 23281336 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Expediting peer review: why say yes. Quan SF J Clin Sleep Med; 2014 Nov; 10(11):1167. PubMed ID: 25325582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. State of the Journal: Women First Authors, Peer Reviewers, and Editorial Board Members at Annals of Emergency Medicine. Kaji AH; Meurer WJ; Napper T; Nigrovic LE; Mower WR; Schriger DL; Cooper RJ; Ann Emerg Med; 2019 Dec; 74(6):731-735. PubMed ID: 31280922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Peer review processes at the Health Information and Libraries Journal. Grant MJ Health Info Libr J; 2018 Dec; 35(4):263-264. PubMed ID: 30499172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Am I flogging a dead metaphor? Sloppy scholarship and the implied spider. McKenzie R J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2005 Oct; 12(5):550-5. PubMed ID: 16164505 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Welcome from the new Editor-in-Chief! Kastner S Prog Neurobiol; 2019 Jan; 172():1. PubMed ID: 30476530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]