411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28933712)
1. Volume Load and Neuromuscular Fatigue During an Acute Bout of Agonist-Antagonist Paired-Set vs. Traditional-Set Training.
Paz GA; Robbins DW; de Oliveira CG; Bottaro M; Miranda H
J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Oct; 31(10):2777-2784. PubMed ID: 28933712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of an upper-body agonist-antagonist resistance training protocol on volume load and efficiency.
Robbins DW; Young WB; Behm DG
J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Oct; 24(10):2632-40. PubMed ID: 20847705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Physical performance and electromyographic responses to an acute bout of paired set strength training versus traditional strength training.
Robbins DW; Young WB; Behm DG; Payne WR; Klimstra MD
J Strength Cond Res; 2010 May; 24(5):1237-45. PubMed ID: 20440121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Postexercise Hypotension and Heart Rate Variability Responses Subsequent to Traditional, Paired Set, and Superset Resistance Training Methods.
Paz GA; Iglesias-Soler E; Willardson JM; Maia MF; Miranda H
J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Sep; 33(9):2433-2442. PubMed ID: 29239982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acute Hormone Responses Subsequent to Agonist-Antagonist Paired Set vs. Traditional Straight Set Resistance Training.
Miranda H; de Souza JAAA; Scudese E; Paz GA; Salerno VP; Vigário PDS; Willardson JM
J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Jun; 34(6):1591-1599. PubMed ID: 29979283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of a complex agonist and antagonist resistance training protocol on volume load, power output, electromyographic responses, and efficiency.
Robbins DW; Young WB; Behm DG; Payne WR
J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Jul; 24(7):1782-9. PubMed ID: 20555283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Maximal Strength Performance and Muscle Activation for the Bench Press and Triceps Extension Exercises Adopting Dumbbell, Barbell, and Machine Modalities Over Multiple Sets.
Farias DA; Willardson JM; Paz GA; Bezerra ES; Miranda H
J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Jul; 31(7):1879-1887. PubMed ID: 27669189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of rest interval array on training volume, perceived exertion, neuromuscular fatigue, and metabolic responses during agonist-antagonist muscle alternative training.
Zhao H; Yamaguchi S; Okada J
J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2020 Apr; 60(4):536-543. PubMed ID: 31974337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Maximal strength performance, efficiency, and myoelectric responses with differing intra-set rest intervals during paired set training.
Paz GA; de Freitas Maia M; Miranda H; de Castro JBP; Willardson JM
J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2020 Jan; 24(1):263-268. PubMed ID: 31987555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Myoeletric indices of fatigue adopting different rest intervals during leg press sets.
Miranda H; Maia M; de Oliveira CG; Farias D; da Silva JB; Lima VP; Willardson JM; Paz GA
J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2018 Jan; 22(1):178-183. PubMed ID: 29332743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acute effects of antagonist static stretching in the inter-set rest period on repetition performance and muscle activation.
Miranda H; Maia Mde F; Paz GA; Costa PB
Res Sports Med; 2015; 23(1):37-50. PubMed ID: 25630245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neuromuscular responses for resistance training sessions adopting traditional, superset, paired set and circuit methods.
Paz GA; Maia MF; Salerno VP; Coburn J; Willardson JM; Miranda H
J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2019 Dec; 59(12):1991-2002. PubMed ID: 31113178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of muscle activity and tissue oxygenation during strength training protocols that differ by their organisation, rest interval between sets, and volume.
Penzer F; Cabrol A; Baudry S; Duchateau J
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2016 Sep; 116(9):1795-806. PubMed ID: 27439989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acute neuromuscular and fatigue responses to the rest-pause method.
Marshall PW; Robbins DA; Wrightson AW; Siegler JC
J Sci Med Sport; 2012 Mar; 15(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 21940213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exercise order interacts with rest interval during upper-body resistance exercise.
Miranda H; Simão R; dos Santos Vigário P; de Salles BF; Pacheco MT; Willardson JM
J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Jun; 24(6):1573-7. PubMed ID: 20508461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Physical performance and cardiovascular responses to an acute bout of heavy resistance circuit training versus traditional strength training.
Alcaraz PE; Sánchez-Lorente J; Blazevich AJ
J Strength Cond Res; 2008 May; 22(3):667-71. PubMed ID: 18438256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of resistive exercise rest interval on hormonal response, strength, and hypertrophy with training.
Buresh R; Berg K; French J
J Strength Cond Res; 2009 Jan; 23(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 19077743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Men exhibit greater fatigue resistance than women in alternated bench press and leg press exercises.
Monteiro ER; Steele J; Novaes JS; Brown AF; Cavanaugh MT; Vingren JL; Behm DG
J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2019 Feb; 59(2):238-245. PubMed ID: 29148630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of Rest Interval Length Between Sets on Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Variability After a Strength Training Session Performed By Prehypertensive Men.
Figueiredo T; Willardson JM; Miranda H; Bentes CM; Machado Reis V; Freitas de Salles B; Simão R
J Strength Cond Res; 2016 Jul; 30(7):1813-24. PubMed ID: 27331912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of the "Slingshot" Bench Press Training Aid on Bench Press Kinematics and Neuromuscular Activity in Competitive Powerlifters.
Dugdale JH; Hunter AM; Di Virgilio TG; Macgregor LJ; Hamilton DL
J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Feb; 33(2):327-336. PubMed ID: 28234710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
