These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28933873)

  • 1. Is testing a more effective learning strategy than note-taking?
    Rummer R; Schweppe J; Gerst K; Wagner S
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Sep; 23(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 28933873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention.
    Roediger HL; Karpicke JD
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Mar; 17(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 16507066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Repeated testing, item selection, and relearning: the benefits of testing outweigh the costs.
    de Jonge M; Tabbers HK
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 23422656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The read-recite-review study strategy: effective and portable.
    McDaniel MA; Howard DC; Einstein GO
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Apr; 20(4):516-22. PubMed ID: 19320858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying.
    Butler AC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1118-33. PubMed ID: 20804289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The JOIs of text comprehension: Supplementing retrieval practice to enhance inference performance.
    Nguyen K; McDaniel MA
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2016 Mar; 22(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 26523339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding to practice retrieval during learning.
    Karpicke JD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Nov; 138(4):469-86. PubMed ID: 19883131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fact learning: how information accuracy, delay, and repeated testing change retention and retrieval experience.
    Barber SJ; Rajaram S; Marsh EJ
    Memory; 2008 Nov; 16(8):934-46. PubMed ID: 18949663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving self-regulated learning with a retrieval practice intervention.
    Ariel R; Karpicke JD
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Mar; 24(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 28604013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diminished testing benefits in young adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Dudukovic NM; Gottshall JL; Cavanaugh PA; Moody CT
    Memory; 2015; 23(8):1264-76. PubMed ID: 25385006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When does the test-study-test sequence optimize learning and retention?
    McDaniel MA; Bugg JM; Liu Y; Brick J
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2015 Dec; 21(4):370-82. PubMed ID: 26501502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Critical Importance of Retrieval--and Spacing--for Learning.
    Soderstrom NC; Kerr TK; Bjork RA
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Feb; 27(2):223-30. PubMed ID: 26674128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.
    Halamish V; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 21480751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metacognitive strategies in student learning: do students practise retrieval when they study on their own?
    Karpicke JD; Butler AC; Roediger HL
    Memory; 2009 May; 17(4):471-9. PubMed ID: 19358016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the placement of practice questions during study.
    Weinstein Y; Nunes LD; Karpicke JD
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2016 Mar; 22(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 26950160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retrieval practice makes procedure from remembering: An automatization account of the testing effect.
    Racsmány M; Szőllősi Á; Bencze D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jan; 44(1):157-166. PubMed ID: 28661178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The contributions of encoding, retention, and recall to the Hebb effect.
    Oberauer K; Meyer N
    Memory; 2009 Oct; 17(7):774-81. PubMed ID: 19598058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Note taking, review, memory, and comprehension.
    Bohay M; Blakely DP; Tamplin AK; Radvansky GA
    Am J Psychol; 2011; 124(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 21506451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of testing on subsequent re-encoding and long-term forgetting of action-relevant materials: On the influence of recall type.
    Kubik V; Nilsson LG; Olofsson JK; Jönsson FU
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Oct; 56(5):475-81. PubMed ID: 26243692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multimedia learning trumps retrieval practice in psychology teaching.
    Jägerskog AS; Jönsson FU; Selander S; Jonsson B
    Scand J Psychol; 2019 Jun; 60(3):222-230. PubMed ID: 30809837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.