186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28934083)
1. Outpatient vaginal hysterectomy: Comparison of conventional suture ligature versus electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing.
Giraudet G; Lucot JP; Sanz F; Rubod C; Collinet P; Cosson M
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 May; 46(5):399-404. PubMed ID: 28934083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Outpatient vaginal hysterectomy, feasibility and morbidity: an observational study on thirty patients].
Pizzoferrato AC; Bader G; Nyangoh Timoh K; Andriamafidy-Berti C; Villefranque V
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 Feb; 42(2):67-70. PubMed ID: 24468702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing versus conventional clamping and suturing for vaginal hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial.
Lakeman MM; The S; Schellart RP; Dietz V; ter Haar JF; Thurkow A; Scholten PC; Dijkgraaf MG; Roovers JP
BJOG; 2012 Nov; 119(12):1473-82. PubMed ID: 22925365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bipolar coagulation with the BiClamp forceps versus conventional suture ligation: a multicenter randomized controlled trial in 175 vaginal hysterectomy patients.
Zubke W; Hornung R; Wässerer S; Hucke J; Füllers U; Werner C; Schmitz P; Lobodasch K; Hammermüller U; Wojdat R; Volz J; De Wilde RL; Wallwiener D
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Nov; 280(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 19252920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized trial of suture versus electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing in vaginal hysterectomy.
Levy B; Emery L
Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jul; 102(1):147-51. PubMed ID: 12850621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomized study of bipolar vessel sealing system versus conventional suture ligature for vaginal hysterectomy.
Silva-Filho AL; Rodrigues AM; Vale de Castro Monteiro M; da Rosa DG; Pereira e Silva YM; Werneck RA; Bavoso N; Triginelli SA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Oct; 146(2):200-3. PubMed ID: 19380188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The use of ThermoStapler--bipolar vessel sealing system in vaginal hysterectomy].
Malinowski A; Pawłowska N; Wojciechowski M
Ginekol Pol; 2008 Dec; 79(12):850-5. PubMed ID: 19175042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety and efficacy of using advanced electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy in morbidly obese patients: a retrospective cohort analysis.
Karacan T; Ozyurek E; Wetherilt LS; Kiyak H; Yilmaz S; Kaya E
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(10):523-529. PubMed ID: 29192412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy using electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing technique: a randomized controlled trial.
Allam IS; Makled AK; Gomaa IA; El Bishry GM; Bayoumy HA; Ali DF
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 291(6):1341-5. PubMed ID: 25524534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of using electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy in patients with different degrees of operative difficulty: a randomised controlled trial.
Elhao M; Abdallah K; Serag I; El-Laithy M; Agur W
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Nov; 147(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 19729238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy.
Cronjé HS; de Coning EC
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Dec; 91(3):243-5. PubMed ID: 16243338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Postoperative pain after hysterectomy through vaginal routes using electro surgical bipolar vessel sealing versus conventional suture ligature].
Douay N; Belot F; Bader G; Guyot B; Heitz D; Fauconnier A
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007; 35(7-8):632-6. PubMed ID: 17587630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally invasive vaginal hysterectomy using bipolar vessel sealing: preliminary experience with 500 cases.
Ghirardini G; Mohamed M; Bartolamasi A; Malmusi S; Dalla Vecchia E; Algeri I; Zanni A; Renzi A; Cavicchioni O; Braconi A; Pazzoni F; Alboni C
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Jan; 33(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 23259887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. LigaSure vessel sealing system in vaginal hysterectomy: safety, efficacy and limitations.
Gizzo S; Burul G; Di Gangi S; Lamparelli L; Saccardi C; Nardelli GB; D'Antona D
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Nov; 288(5):1067-74. PubMed ID: 23625333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Safety and efficacy of using the LigaSure vessel sealing system for securing the pedicles in vaginal hysterectomy: randomised controlled trial.
Hefni MA; Bhaumik J; El-Toukhy T; Kho P; Wong I; Abdel-Razik T; Davies AE
BJOG; 2005 Mar; 112(3):329-33. PubMed ID: 15713149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Safety and Efficacy of Advanced Bipolar Vessel Sealing in Vaginal Hysterectomy: 1000 Cases.
Clavé H; Clavé A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):272-279. PubMed ID: 27826116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing versus conventional clamping and suturing for vaginal hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial.
Lakeman MM; Roovers JP
BJOG; 2013 May; 120(6):777. PubMed ID: 23565958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing versus conventional clamping and suturing for vaginal hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial.
Soreefan AH; Beebeejaun MS
BJOG; 2013 May; 120(6):776-7. PubMed ID: 23565956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Vaginal hysterectomy using electrofusion: a study of 96 cases].
Dubuisson J; Golfier F; Massoud M; Benchaib M; Bryssine B; Raudrant D
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Feb; 37(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 18068907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Vaginal hysterectomy in outpatient procedure: Feasibility and satisfaction study].
Reboul Q; Mehdi A; Chauleur C
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018 Feb; 46(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 29398522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
