180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28934580)
1. An Integrated Nine-Step Approach to Managing Clinical Technology Risks.
Brady TC; Panagiotopoulos G
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2017 Sept./Oct.; 51(5):398-407. PubMed ID: 28934580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Birth of a Standard: Achieving Consensus on Safe and Effective Healthcare Technology.
Vockley M
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2017 Sept./Oct.; 51(5):368-379. PubMed ID: 28934572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Frontlines: To Hatch a Standard.
Sheffer J
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2017 Sept./Oct.; 51(5):356. PubMed ID: 28934573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Principles and Benefits of Explicitly Designed Medical Device Safety Architecture.
Larson BR; Jones P; Zhang Y; Hatcliff J
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2017 Sept./Oct.; 51(5):380-389. PubMed ID: 28934584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Putting patient safety first: the sterile processing department and healthcare technology management.
Chobin N; Swanson K
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2012; Suppl():27-31. PubMed ID: 22559773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A Roundtable Discussion: Elevating the Importance of Effective, Reliable Sterilization and Reprocessing.
Sheffer J; Basile R; Hendee S; Kwinn C; Prust J
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2017 Sept./Oct.; 51(5):414-422. PubMed ID: 28934567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reducing risks and recalls: safety assurance cases for medical devices.
Eagles S; Wu F
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2014; 48(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 24548031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. AAMI Standards: A History of Ensuring Medical Technology Quality and Performance.
Lewelling J
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2017; 51(3):210-211. PubMed ID: 28530882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Managing risk during transition to new ISO tubing connector standards.
Sentinel Event Alert; 2014 Aug; (53):1-6. PubMed ID: 25144941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Universal design in engineering's future.
Enderle J
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2006; 25(4):4, 6. PubMed ID: 16898651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Design considerations for medical device manufacturers.
Patel A; Pope J; Neilson M
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2012; Suppl():73-5. PubMed ID: 22559781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectively incorporating risk management into quality systems.
Donawa M
Med Device Technol; 2006 Jun; 17(5):28-30. PubMed ID: 16903387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is the warning effective? Clinical alarms remain an area for patient safety improvement.
Clark T
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2005; 39(5):357-8. PubMed ID: 16248441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk management and IEC 60601-1: assessing compliance.
Grob A; Biersach B; Peck J
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2015; Suppl():55-9. PubMed ID: 25793452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. From regulation to registration. Safety and performance needs drive industry consensus on voluntary servicing, remarketing controls.
Hatem MB
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1999; 33(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 10511908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Safety first! managing risks for a daisy chain of medical devices connected to the IT-network - first experiences applying IEC 80001-1.
Ahlbrandt J; Röhrig R
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():982. PubMed ID: 23920756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Standards update.
Moore R
Med Device Technol; 2003; 14(1):36. PubMed ID: 12974124
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Clearly defined design input is key to product development.
Pelnik TM
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2006; 40(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 16544789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Step-by-step risk management for medical IT networks.
Delvecchio K
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2011; Suppl():37-43. PubMed ID: 21992044
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cleaning instructions for use: a central sterile service department perspective.
Klacik S
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2012; Suppl():80-4. PubMed ID: 22559783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
