369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28934588)
1. Making Retrospective Confidence Judgments Improves Learners' Ability to Decide What Not to Study.
Robey AM; Dougherty MR; Buttaccio DR
Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1683-1693. PubMed ID: 28934588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using the past to predict the future.
Dougherty MR; Scheck P; Nelson TO; Narens L
Mem Cognit; 2005 Sep; 33(6):1096-115. PubMed ID: 16496729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Judgments of learning index relative confidence, not subjective probability.
Zawadzka K; Higham PA
Mem Cognit; 2015 Nov; 43(8):1168-79. PubMed ID: 26111879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Framing affects scale usage for judgments of learning, not confidence in memory.
England BD; Ortegren FR; Serra MJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1898-1908. PubMed ID: 28504530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do metacognitive judgments alter memory performance beyond the benefits of retrieval practice? A comment on and replication attempt of Dougherty, Scheck, Nelson, and Narens (2005).
Dougherty MR; Robey AM; Buttaccio D
Mem Cognit; 2018 May; 46(4):558-565. PubMed ID: 29368228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Why do learners ignore expected feedback in making metacognitive decisions about retrieval practice?
Toppino TC; Heslin KA; Curley TM; Jackiewicz MK; Flowers CS; Phelan HA
Mem Cognit; 2021 Oct; 49(7):1423-1435. PubMed ID: 33770397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Metacognitive control over the distribution of retrieval practice with and without feedback and the efficacy of learners' spacing choices.
Toppino TC; Pagano MJ
Mem Cognit; 2021 Apr; 49(3):467-479. PubMed ID: 33006078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Metacognitive unawareness of the errorful generation benefit and its effects on self-regulated learning.
Yang C; Potts R; Shanks DR
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1073-1092. PubMed ID: 28114778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Confidence ratings are better predictors of future performance than delayed judgments of learning.
Putnam AL; Deng W; DeSoto KA
Memory; 2022 May; 30(5):537-553. PubMed ID: 35037570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How Much Do Metamemory Beliefs Contribute to the Font-Size Effect in Judgments of Learning?
Hu X; Li T; Zheng J; Su N; Liu Z; Luo L
PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142351. PubMed ID: 26556478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Metacognitive monitoring during criterion learning: when and why are judgments accurate?
Pyc MA; Rawson KA; Aschenbrenner AJ
Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):886-97. PubMed ID: 24643790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The efficacy of learners' testing choices.
Tullis JG; Fiechter JL; Benjamin AS
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(4):540-552. PubMed ID: 29094989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Metamemory viewed through the judgment lens.
Bröder A; Undorf M
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jun; 197():153-165. PubMed ID: 31158737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Beliefs about memory decline in aging do not impact judgments of learning (JOLs): A challenge for belief-based explanations of JOLs.
Tauber SK; Witherby AE; Dunlosky J
Mem Cognit; 2019 Aug; 47(6):1102-1119. PubMed ID: 30859406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Explaining the forgetting bias effect on value judgments: The influence of memory for a past test.
Rhodes MG; Witherby AE; Castel AD; Murayama K
Mem Cognit; 2017 Apr; 45(3):362-374. PubMed ID: 27873187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing electrophysiological correlates of judgment of learning and feeling of knowing during face-name recognition.
Irak M; Soylu C; Turan G
Cogn Neuropsychol; 2019; 36(7-8):336-357. PubMed ID: 31928316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intuition and metacognition: The effect of semantic coherence on judgments of learning.
Undorf M; Zander T
Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1217-1224. PubMed ID: 27815819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the "Displaced-JOL effect".
Bui Y; Pyc MA; Bailey H
Memory; 2018 Jul; 26(6):771-783. PubMed ID: 29187067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. When asking the question changes the ultimate answer: Metamemory judgments change memory.
Mitchum AL; Kelley CM; Fox MC
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Feb; 145(2):200-19. PubMed ID: 27045282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An ERP study on metacognitive monitoring processes in children.
Tsalas NRH; Müller BCN; Meinhardt J; Proust J; Paulus M; Sodian B
Brain Res; 2018 Sep; 1695():84-90. PubMed ID: 29852136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
