These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28935163)
1. Optimising the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in the Era of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis Based on the Prostate MR Imaging Study (PROMIS). Faria R; Soares MO; Spackman E; Ahmed HU; Brown LC; Kaplan R; Emberton M; Sculpher MJ Eur Urol; 2018 Jan; 73(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 28935163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multiparametric MRI to improve detection of prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy alone: the PROMIS study. Brown LC; Ahmed HU; Faria R; El-Shater Bosaily A; Gabe R; Kaplan RS; Parmar M; Collaco-Moraes Y; Ward K; Hindley RG; Freeman A; Kirkham A; Oldroyd R; Parker C; Bott S; Burns-Cox N; Dudderidge T; Ghei M; Henderson A; Persad R; Rosario DJ; Shergill I; Winkler M; Soares M; Spackman E; Sculpher M; Emberton M Health Technol Assess; 2018 Jul; 22(39):1-176. PubMed ID: 30040065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance for Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer: A Cost-effectiveness Modeling Study. Patel S; Rongen JJ; Fütterer JJ; Boltyenkov A; Rovers MM Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Dec; 1(6):476-483. PubMed ID: 31158091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR-guided targeted biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in diagnosing prostate cancer: a modelling study from a health care perspective. de Rooij M; Crienen S; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO; Rovers MM; Grutters JP Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 24377803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Active Surveillance Strategies for Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer. Sathianathen NJ; Konety BR; Alarid-Escudero F; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM; Kuntz KM Eur Urol; 2019 Jun; 75(6):910-917. PubMed ID: 30425010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical Utility of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging as the First-line Tool for Men with High Clinical Suspicion of Prostate Cancer. Panebianco V; Valerio MC; Giuliani A; Pecoraro M; Ceravolo I; Barchetti G; Catalano C; Padhani AR Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Aug; 1(3):208-214. PubMed ID: 31102623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study. van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in aiding the localisation of prostate abnormalities for biopsy: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Mowatt G; Scotland G; Boachie C; Cruickshank M; Ford JA; Fraser C; Kurban L; Lam TB; Padhani AR; Royle J; Scheenen TW; Tassie E Health Technol Assess; 2013 May; 17(20):vii-xix, 1-281. PubMed ID: 23697373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and MRI-guided biopsy in a population-based prostate cancer screening setting using a micro-simulation model. Getaneh AM; Heijnsdijk EA; de Koning HJ Cancer Med; 2021 Jun; 10(12):4046-4053. PubMed ID: 33991077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness analysis of multiparametric MRI with increased active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer in Australia. Gordon LG; James R; Tuffaha HW; Lowe A; Yaxley J J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 May; 45(5):1304-1315. PubMed ID: 27726240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy in diagnosing prostate cancer. Cerantola Y; Dragomir A; Tanguay S; Bladou F; Aprikian A; Kassouf W Urol Oncol; 2016 Mar; 34(3):119.e1-9. PubMed ID: 26602178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The FUTURE Trial: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial on Target Biopsy Techniques Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prior Negative Biopsies. Wegelin O; Exterkate L; van der Leest M; Kummer JA; Vreuls W; de Bruin PC; Bosch JLHR; Barentsz JO; Somford DM; van Melick HHE Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):582-590. PubMed ID: 30522912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lifetime Health and Economic Outcomes of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging as First-Line Screening for Prostate Cancer : A Decision Model Analysis. Gulati R; Jiao B; Al-Faouri R; Sharma V; Kaul S; Fleishman A; Wymer K; Boorjian SA; Olumi AF; Etzioni R; Gershman B Ann Intern Med; 2024 Jul; 177(7):871-881. PubMed ID: 38830219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of MR Imaging-guided Strategies for Detection of Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men. Pahwa S; Schiltz NK; Ponsky LE; Lu Z; Griswold MA; Gulani V Radiology; 2017 Oct; 285(1):157-166. PubMed ID: 28514203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Decision analysis model comparing cost of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging vs. repeat biopsy for detection of prostate cancer in men with prior negative findings on biopsy. Lotan Y; Haddad AQ; Costa DN; Pedrosa I; Rofsky NM; Roehrborn CG Urol Oncol; 2015 Jun; 33(6):266.e9-16. PubMed ID: 25858102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-Effectiveness Comparison of Imaging-Guided Prostate Biopsy Techniques: Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound, Direct In-Bore MRI, and Image Fusion. Venderink W; Govers TM; de Rooij M; Fütterer JJ; Sedelaar JPM AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 May; 208(5):1058-1063. PubMed ID: 28225639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators. Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; Schoots IG; Chiu PK; Osses DF; Tijsterman JD; Beerlage HP; Mannaerts CK; Schimmöller L; Albers P; Arsov C Eur Urol; 2019 Feb; 75(2):310-318. PubMed ID: 30082150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What Type of Prostate Cancer Is Systematically Overlooked by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? An Analysis from the PROMIS Cohort. Norris JM; Carmona Echeverria LM; Bott SRJ; Brown LC; Burns-Cox N; Dudderidge T; El-Shater Bosaily A; Frangou E; Freeman A; Ghei M; Henderson A; Hindley RG; Kaplan RS; Kirkham A; Oldroyd R; Parker C; Persad R; Punwani S; Rosario DJ; Shergill IS; Stavrinides V; Winkler M; Whitaker HC; Ahmed HU; Emberton M Eur Urol; 2020 Aug; 78(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 32370911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies. Pokorny MR; de Rooij M; Duncan E; Schröder FH; Parkinson R; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 24666839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans. Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]