BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28935271)

  • 1. Magnetic resonance imaging during definitive chemoradiotherapy can predict tumor recurrence and patient survival in locally advanced cervical cancer: A multi-institutional retrospective analysis of KROG 16-01.
    Lee SW; Lee SH; Kim J; Kim YS; Yoon MS; Jeong S; Kim JH; Lee J; Eom KY; Jeong BK; Sung SY; Lee SJ; Lee JH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 147(2):334-339. PubMed ID: 28935271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic resonance imaging after external beam radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer helps to identify patients at risk of recurrence.
    Angeles MA; Baissas P; Leblanc E; Lusque A; Ferron G; Ducassou A; Martínez-Gómez C; Querleu D; Martinez A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Mar; 29(3):480-486. PubMed ID: 30712019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting tumor recurrence in patients with cervical carcinoma treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: value of quantitative histogram analysis on diffusion-weighted MR images.
    Erbay G; Onal C; Karadeli E; Guler OC; Arica S; Koc Z
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Apr; 58(4):481-488. PubMed ID: 27445314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Significance of elevated SCC-Ag level on tumor recurrence and patient survival in patients with squamous-cell carcinoma of uterine cervix following definitive chemoradiotherapy: a multi-institutional analysis.
    Choi KH; Lee SW; Yu M; Jeong S; Lee JW; Lee JH
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):e1. PubMed ID: 30479085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Predictor of Outcome in Cervical Cancer After Chemoradiation.
    Ho JC; Allen PK; Bhosale PR; Rauch GM; Fuller CD; Mohamed AS; Frumovitz M; Jhingran A; Klopp AH
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Mar; 97(3):546-553. PubMed ID: 28011045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Oncologic outcomes in the era of modern radiation therapy using FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer.
    Brodeur MN; Dejean R; Beauchemin MC; Samouëlian V; Cormier B; Bacha OM; Warkus T; Barkati M
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 162(2):277-283. PubMed ID: 34059350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical outcomes of definitive chemoradiation followed by intracavitary pulsed-dose rate image-guided adaptive brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Castelnau-Marchand P; Chargari C; Maroun P; Dumas I; Del Campo ER; Cao K; Petit C; Martinetti F; Tafo-Guemnie A; Lefkopoulos D; Morice P; Haie-Meder C; Mazeron R
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Nov; 139(2):288-94. PubMed ID: 26364808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pre-treatment MRI minimum apparent diffusion coefficient value is a potential prognostic imaging biomarker in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation.
    Marconi DG; Fregnani JH; Rossini RR; Netto AK; Lucchesi FR; Tsunoda AT; Kamrava M
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():556. PubMed ID: 27469349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prophylactic lower para-aortic irradiation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy mitigates the risk of para-aortic recurrence in locally advanced cervical cancer: A 10-year institutional experience.
    Lee J; Lin JB; Chang CL; Jan YT; Sun FJ; Wu MH; Chen YJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Jul; 146(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 28457584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tumour size, volume, and marker expression during radiation therapy can predict survival of cervical cancer patients: a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of KROG 16-01.
    Lee JH; Lee SW; Kim JR; Kim YS; Yoon MS; Jeong S; Kim JH; Lee JY; Eom KY; Jeong BK; Lee SH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Dec; 147(3):577-584. PubMed ID: 29110878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy With Image-guided Pulsed Dose Rate Brachytherapy as a Definitive Treatment Modality for Early-stage Cervical Cancer.
    Refaat T; Castelain B; Small W; Elsaid A; Lotfy N; Lartigau E; Nickers P
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2015 Jun; 38(3):289-93. PubMed ID: 23799285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging during chemoradiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer.
    Makino H; Kato H; Furui T; Morishige K; Kanematsu M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Apr; 40(4):1098-104. PubMed ID: 24320754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of Image-guided Brachytherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma Receiving Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.
    Chen SW; Liang JA; Hung YC; Yeh LS; Chang WC; Lin WC; Chang YY
    Anticancer Res; 2019 Jun; 39(6):3015-3024. PubMed ID: 31177143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of outcome using pretreatment
    Lucia F; Visvikis D; Desseroit MC; Miranda O; Malhaire JP; Robin P; Pradier O; Hatt M; Schick U
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 May; 45(5):768-786. PubMed ID: 29222685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extended field intensity modulated radiation therapy with concomitant boost for lymph node-positive cervical cancer: analysis of regional control and recurrence patterns in the positron emission tomography/computed tomography era.
    Vargo JA; Kim H; Choi S; Sukumvanich P; Olawaiye AB; Kelley JL; Edwards RP; Comerci JT; Beriwal S
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Dec; 90(5):1091-8. PubMed ID: 25303889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment response evaluation using the mean apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.
    Onal C; Erbay G; Guler OC
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Oct; 44(4):1010-9. PubMed ID: 26919800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Complete metabolic response after definitive radiation therapy for cervical cancer: patterns and factors predicting for recurrence.
    Beriwal S; Kannan N; Sukumvanich P; Richard SD; Kelley JL; Edwards RP; Olawaiye A; Krivak TC
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Nov; 127(2):303-6. PubMed ID: 22902917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does external beam radiation boost to pelvic lymph nodes improve outcomes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer?
    Wujanto C; Choo BA; Tan D; Ilancheran A; Ng J; Low JJH; Shen L; Tang J; Koh V
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Apr; 19(1):385. PubMed ID: 31023261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patterns of failure and prognostic factor analyses in locally advanced cervical cancer patients staged by positron emission tomography and treated with curative intent.
    Narayan K; Fisher RJ; Bernshaw D; Shakher R; Hicks RJ
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2009 Jul; 19(5):912-8. PubMed ID: 19574784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictors of Radiation Field Failure After Definitive Chemoradiation in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.
    Bae HS; Kim YJ; Lim MC; Seo SS; Park SY; Kang S; Kim SH; Kim JY
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 May; 26(4):737-42. PubMed ID: 26937749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.