These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28935830)

  • 1. The impact of artifact correction methods of RR series on heart rate variability parameters.
    Rincon Soler AI; Silva LEV; Fazan R; Murta LO
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2018 Mar; 124(3):646-652. PubMed ID: 28935830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The sensitivity of 38 heart rate variability measures to the addition of artifact in human and artificial 24-hr cardiac recordings.
    Stapelberg NJC; Neumann DL; Shum DHK; McConnell H; Hamilton-Craig I
    Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2018 Jan; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 28670841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of missing RR-interval data on nonlinear heart rate variability analysis.
    Kim KK; Baek HJ; Lim YG; Park KS
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Jun; 106(3):210-8. PubMed ID: 21194782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of artifact correction on spectral estimates of heart rate variability.
    Peters C; Vullings R; Bergmans J; Oei G; Wijn P
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():2669-72. PubMed ID: 19163254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of methods for removal of ectopy in measurement of heart rate variability.
    Lippman N; Stein KM; Lerman BB
    Am J Physiol; 1994 Jul; 267(1 Pt 2):H411-8. PubMed ID: 7519408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nonlinear predictive interpolation. A new method for the correction of ectopic beats for heart rate variability analysis.
    Lippman N; Stein KM; Lerman BB
    J Electrocardiol; 1993; 26 Suppl():14-9. PubMed ID: 7514643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A preprocessing tool for removing artifact from cardiac RR interval recordings using three-dimensional spatial distribution mapping.
    Stapelberg NJ; Neumann DL; Shum DH; McConnell H; Hamilton-Craig I
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Apr; 53(4):482-92. PubMed ID: 26751605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A robust algorithm for heart rate variability time series artefact correction using novel beat classification.
    Lipponen JA; Tarvainen MP
    J Med Eng Technol; 2019 Apr; 43(3):173-181. PubMed ID: 31314618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of 2nd-degree AV blocks, ECG recording length, and recording time on heart rate variability analyses in horses.
    Eggensperger BH; Schwarzwald CC
    J Vet Cardiol; 2017 Apr; 19(2):160-174. PubMed ID: 28117225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of the Impact of Interpolation Methods of Missing RR-intervals Caused by Motion Artifacts on HRV Features Estimations.
    Morelli D; Rossi A; Cairo M; Clifton DA
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Jul; 19(14):. PubMed ID: 31323850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of QRS misclassifications on heart-rate-variability parameters (results from the CARLA cohort study).
    Sauerbier F; Haerting J; Sedding D; Mikolajczyk R; Werdan K; Nuding S; Greiser KH; Swenne CA; Kors JA; Kluttig A
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0304893. PubMed ID: 38885223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Heart Rate Variability During Exercise: A Comparison of Artefact Correction Methods.
    Giles DA; Draper N
    J Strength Cond Res; 2018 Mar; 32(3):726-735. PubMed ID: 29466273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. RMSSD Is More Sensitive to Artifacts Than Frequency-Domain Parameters: Implication in Athletes' Monitoring.
    Bourdillon N; Yazdani S; Vesin JM; Schmitt L; Millet GP
    J Sports Sci Med; 2022 Jun; 21(2):260-266. PubMed ID: 35719238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Artifact Correction in Short-Term HRV during Strenuous Physical Exercise.
    Królak A; Wiktorski T; Bjørkavoll-Bergseth MF; Ørn S
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Nov; 20(21):. PubMed ID: 33171676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can RR intervals editing and selection techniques interfere with the analysis of heart rate variability?
    Ribeiro GDS; Neves VR; Deresz LF; Melo RD; Dal Lago P; Karsten M
    Braz J Phys Ther; 2018; 22(5):383-390. PubMed ID: 29653903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can heart rate variability parameters derived by a heart rate monitor differentiate between atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm?
    Broux B; De Clercq D; Vera L; Ven S; Deprez P; Decloedt A; van Loon G
    BMC Vet Res; 2018 Oct; 14(1):320. PubMed ID: 30359273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimizing Intersession Reliability of Heart Rate Variability-The Effects of Artifact Correction and Breathing Type.
    Gisselman AS; D'Amico M; Smoliga JM
    J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Nov; 34(11):3199-3207. PubMed ID: 33105371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A continuous wavelet transform-based method for time-frequency analysis of artefact-corrected heart rate variability data.
    Peters CH; Vullings R; Rooijakkers MJ; Bergmans JW; Oei SG; Wijn PF
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Oct; 32(10):1517-27. PubMed ID: 21849721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation between RR, inter-systolic and inter-diastolic intervals and their differences for the analysis of spontaneous heart rate variability.
    Dias DP; Silva LE; Katayama PL; Silva CA; Salgado HC; Fazan R
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Jul; 37(7):1120-8. PubMed ID: 27328016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What is the adequate sampling interval of the ECG signal for heart rate variability analysis in the time domain?
    Hejjel L; Roth E
    Physiol Meas; 2004 Dec; 25(6):1405-11. PubMed ID: 15712719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.