232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28935936)
1. Evidence of auditory insensitivity to vocalization frequencies in two frogs.
Goutte S; Mason MJ; Christensen-Dalsgaard J; Montealegre-Z F; Chivers BD; Sarria-S FA; Antoniazzi MM; Jared C; Almeida Sato L; Felipe Toledo L
Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):12121. PubMed ID: 28935936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrasonic communication in concave-eared torrent frogs (Amolops tormotus).
Feng AS; Narins PM
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2008 Feb; 194(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 18228079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reciprocal Matched Filtering in the Inner Ear of the African Clawed Frog (Xenopus laevis).
Cobo-Cuan A; Narins PM
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2020 Feb; 21(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 31907715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors influencing the evolution of acoustic communication: biological constraints.
Ryan MJ
Brain Behav Evol; 1986; 28(1-3):70-82. PubMed ID: 3567542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sound source localization and segregation with internally coupled ears: the treefrog model.
Bee MA; Christensen-Dalsgaard J
Biol Cybern; 2016 Oct; 110(4-5):271-290. PubMed ID: 27730384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Severe constraints for sound communication in a frog from the South American temperate forest.
Penna M; Plaza A; Moreno-Gómez FN
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2013 Aug; 199(8):723-33. PubMed ID: 23748250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Floating frogs sound larger: environmental constraints on signal production drives call frequency changes.
Goutte S; Muñoz MI; Ryan MJ; Halfwerk W
Naturwissenschaften; 2020 Sep; 107(5):41. PubMed ID: 32970183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acoustic, auditory, and morphological divergence in three species of neotropical frog.
Wilczynski W; McClelland BE; Rand AS
J Comp Physiol A; 1993 May; 172(4):425-38. PubMed ID: 8315606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sexual hearing: the influence of sex hormones on acoustic communication in frogs.
Arch VS; Narins PM
Hear Res; 2009 Jun; 252(1-2):15-20. PubMed ID: 19272318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Extended amplification of acoustic signals by amphibian burrows.
Muñoz MI; Penna M
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2016 Jul; 202(7):473-87. PubMed ID: 27209276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spatial release from masking improves sound pattern discrimination along a biologically relevant pulse-rate continuum in gray treefrogs.
Ward JL; Buerkle NP; Bee MA
Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 306():63-75. PubMed ID: 24055623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lung mediated auditory contrast enhancement improves the Signal-to-noise ratio for communication in frogs.
Lee N; Christensen-Dalsgaard J; White LA; Schrode KM; Bee MA
Curr Biol; 2021 Apr; 31(7):1488-1498.e4. PubMed ID: 33667371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Frequency matching of vocalizations to inner-ear sensitivity along an altitudinal gradient in the coqui frog.
Meenderink SW; Kits M; Narins PM
Biol Lett; 2010 Apr; 6(2):278-81. PubMed ID: 19939848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Torrent frogs emit acoustic signals of a narrower spectral range in habitats with longer-lasting biotic background noise.
Forti LR; de Melo Sampaio MR; Pires CR; Szabo JK; Toledo LF
Behav Processes; 2022 Aug; 200():104700. PubMed ID: 35798216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ample active acoustic space of a frog from the South American temperate forest.
Penna M; Moreno-Gómez FN
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2014 Mar; 200(3):171-81. PubMed ID: 24356786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visualization of a chorus structure in multiple frog species by a sound discrimination device.
Awano H; Shirasaka M; Mizumoto T; Okuno HG; Aihara I
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2021 Jan; 207(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 33481121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Amplification and spectral shifts of vocalizations inside burrows of the frog Eupsophus calcaratus (Leptodactylidae).
Penna M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1254-60. PubMed ID: 15376690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biological invasions and the acoustic niche: the effect of bullfrog calls on the acoustic signals of white-banded tree frogs.
Both C; Grant T
Biol Lett; 2012 Oct; 8(5):714-6. PubMed ID: 22675139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Female túngara frogs do not experience the continuity illusion.
Baugh AT; Ryan MJ; Bernal XE; Rand AS; Bee MA
Behav Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 130(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 26692450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Acoustic Properties of Low Intensity Vocalizations Match Hearing Sensitivity in the Webbed-Toed Gecko, Gekko subpalmatus.
Chen J; Jono T; Cui J; Yue X; Tang Y
PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146677. PubMed ID: 26752301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
