These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28935936)

  • 41. Frogs Exploit Statistical Regularities in Noisy Acoustic Scenes to Solve Cocktail-Party-like Problems.
    Lee N; Ward JL; Vélez A; Micheyl C; Bee MA
    Curr Biol; 2017 Mar; 27(5):743-750. PubMed ID: 28238657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Nonoptimal propagation of advertisement calls of midwife toads in Iberian habitats.
    Penna M; Márquez R; Bosch J; Crespo EG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Feb; 119(2):1227-37. PubMed ID: 16521783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The biological significance of acoustic stimuli determines ear preference in the music frog.
    Xue F; Fang G; Yang P; Zhao E; Brauth SE; Tang Y
    J Exp Biol; 2015 Mar; 218(Pt 5):740-7. PubMed ID: 25740903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Sound Classification and Call Discrimination Are Decoded in Order as Revealed by Event-Related Potential Components in Frogs.
    Fang G; Yang P; Xue F; Cui J; Brauth SE; Tang Y
    Brain Behav Evol; 2015; 86(3-4):232-45. PubMed ID: 26613526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Bioacoustic of the advertisement call of Ceratophrys cranwelli (Anura: Ceratophryidae)].
    Valetti JA; Salas NE; Martino AL
    Rev Biol Trop; 2013 Mar; 61(1):273-80. PubMed ID: 23894980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Call transmission efficiency in native and invasive anurans: competing hypotheses of divergence in acoustic signals.
    Llusia D; Gómez M; Penna M; Márquez R
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e77312. PubMed ID: 24155940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Vocalizations in juvenile anurans: common spadefoot toads (Pelobates fuscus) regularly emit calls before sexual maturity.
    Ten Hagen L; Rodríguez A; Menke N; Göcking C; Bisping M; Frommolt KH; Ziegler T; Bonkowski M; Vences M
    Naturwissenschaften; 2016 Oct; 103(9-10):75. PubMed ID: 27590626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Little effect of natural noise on high-frequency hearing in frogs, Odorrana tormota.
    Liu J; Yang H; Hu GL; Li S; Xu ZM; Qi Z; Shen JX
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2015 Oct; 201(10):1029-34. PubMed ID: 26260392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Lack of phonotactic preferences of female frogs and its consequences for signal evolution.
    Velásquez NA; Valdés JL; Vásquez RA; Penna M
    Behav Processes; 2015 Sep; 118():76-84. PubMed ID: 26051194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Quantitative acoustic analysis of the vocal repertoire of the golden rocket frog (Anomaloglossus beebei).
    Pettitt BA; Bourne GR; Bee MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):4811-20. PubMed ID: 22712952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Mating vocalizations of female frogs: control and evolutionary mechanisms.
    Emerson SB; Boyd SK
    Brain Behav Evol; 1999; 53(4):187-97. PubMed ID: 10343085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Risky ripples allow bats and frogs to eavesdrop on a multisensory sexual display.
    Halfwerk W; Jones PL; Taylor RC; Ryan MJ; Page RA
    Science; 2014 Jan; 343(6169):413-6. PubMed ID: 24458640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Inherent Directionality Determines Spatial Release from Masking at the Tympanum in a Vertebrate with Internally Coupled Ears.
    Caldwell MS; Lee N; Bee MA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Aug; 17(4):259-70. PubMed ID: 27125545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Harmonic calls and indifferent females: no preference for human consonance in an anuran.
    Akre KL; Bernal X; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Aug; 281(1789):20140986. PubMed ID: 24990679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Frequency channel-dependent selectivity for temporal call characteristics in gray treefrogs,
    Reichert MS; Höbel G
    J Exp Biol; 2017 Apr; 220(Pt 7):1256-1266. PubMed ID: 28104800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Right ear advantage for vocal communication in frogs results from both structural asymmetry and attention modulation.
    Fang G; Xue F; Yang P; Cui J; Brauth SE; Tang Y
    Behav Brain Res; 2014 Jun; 266():77-84. PubMed ID: 24613236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Behavioral measures of signal recognition thresholds in frogs in the presence and absence of chorus-shaped noise.
    Bee MA; Schwartz JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2788-801. PubMed ID: 19894854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Spatial hearing in Cope's gray treefrog: II. Frequency-dependent directionality in the amplitude and phase of tympanum vibrations.
    Caldwell MS; Lee N; Schrode KM; Johns AR; Christensen-Dalsgaard J; Bee MA
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2014 Apr; 200(4):285-304. PubMed ID: 24504183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Differential effects of sound level and temporal structure of calls on phonotaxis by female gray treefrogs, Hyla versicolor.
    Christie KW; Schul J; Feng AS
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2019 Apr; 205(2):223-238. PubMed ID: 30927060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Acoustic analysis of the frequency-dependent coupling between the frog's ears.
    Shofner WP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1623-6. PubMed ID: 26428800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.