These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28936107)

  • 1. Test Reliability at the Individual Level.
    Hu Y; Nesselroade JR; Erbacher MK; Boker SM; Burt SA; Keel PK; Neale MC; Sisk CL; Klump K
    Struct Equ Modeling; 2016; 23(4):532-543. PubMed ID: 28936107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring affect in daily life: A multilevel psychometric evaluation of the PANAS-X across four ecological momentary assessment samples.
    Haney AM; Fleming MN; Wycoff AM; Griffin SA; Trull TJ
    Psychol Assess; 2023 Jun; 35(6):469-483. PubMed ID: 36931821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The positive and negative affect schedule: psychometric properties of the korean version.
    Lim YJ; Yu BH; Kim DK; Kim JH
    Psychiatry Investig; 2010 Sep; 7(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 20927304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychometric properties of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) in a heterogeneous sample of substance users.
    Serafini K; Malin-Mayor B; Nich C; Hunkele K; Carroll KM
    Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse; 2016 Mar; 42(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 26905228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Structural validity and reliability of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): evidence from a large Brazilian community sample.
    Carvalho HW; Andreoli SB; Lara DR; Patrick CJ; Quintana MI; Bressan RA; Melo MF; Mari Jde J; Jorge MR
    Braz J Psychiatry; 2013; 35(2):169-72. PubMed ID: 23904023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factorial and construct validity of the Italian Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS).
    Terracciano A; McCrae RR; Costa PT
    Eur J Psychol Assess; 2003; 19(2):131-141. PubMed ID: 20467578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS) in medical rehabilitation.
    Ostir GV; Smith PM; Smith D; Ottenbacher KJ
    Clin Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 19(7):767-9. PubMed ID: 16250196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample.
    Crawford JR; Henry JD
    Br J Clin Psychol; 2004 Sep; 43(Pt 3):245-65. PubMed ID: 15333231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability in Healthcare Simulation Setting: A Definitional Review.
    Yauger SJ; Konopasky A; Battista A
    Cureus; 2020 May; 12(5):e8111. PubMed ID: 32542164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Test-Retest Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change of Randomized Dichotic Digits in Learning-Disabled Children: Implications for Dichotic Listening Training.
    Mahdavi ME; Pourbakht A; Parand A; Jalaie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):223-232. PubMed ID: 29488872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability for Tests With Items Having Different Numbers of Ordered Categories.
    Kim S; Lu Z; Cohen AS
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Mar; 44(2):137-149. PubMed ID: 32076357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement error and person-specific reliability in multilevel autoregressive modeling.
    Schuurman NK; Hamaker EL
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Feb; 24(1):70-91. PubMed ID: 30188157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Psychometric Properties and Discriminative Capacity in Several Chilean Samples.
    Vera-Villarroel P; Urzúa A; Jaime D; Contreras D; Zych I; Celis-Atenas K; Silva JR; Lillo S
    Eval Health Prof; 2019 Dec; 42(4):473-497. PubMed ID: 29246086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating the Reliability of Aggregated and Within-Person Centered Scores in Ecological Momentary Assessment.
    Huang PH; Weng LJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2012 Jun; 47(3):421-41. PubMed ID: 26814605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychometric Properties of Measures of Team Diversity With Likert Data.
    Deng L; Marcoulides GA; Yuan KH
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Jun; 75(3):512-534. PubMed ID: 29795831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Determination of reliability of psychometric tests in psychiatry using canonical correlation].
    Koch HJ; Gürtler K; Fischer-Barnicol D; Szecsey A; Ibach B
    Psychiatr Prax; 2003 May; 30 Suppl 2():S157-60. PubMed ID: 14509065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine.
    Atkinson G; Nevill AM
    Sports Med; 1998 Oct; 26(4):217-38. PubMed ID: 9820922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability and measurement error of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) recommended performance-based tests of physical function in people with hip and knee osteoarthritis.
    Dobson F; Hinman RS; Hall M; Marshall CJ; Sayer T; Anderson C; Newcomb N; Stratford PW; Bennell KL
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2017 Nov; 25(11):1792-1796. PubMed ID: 28647467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychometric viability of measures of functional performance commonly used for people with dementia: a systematic review of measurement properties.
    Fox B; Henwood T; Keogh J; Neville C
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Aug; 14(8):115-71. PubMed ID: 27635751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Hearing Impairment Impact-Significant Other Profile (HII-SOP): a tool to measure hearing loss-related quality of life in spouses of people with hearing loss.
    Preminger JE; Meeks S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):807-23. PubMed ID: 23169197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.