244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28936547)
1. Body size, body size ratio, and prey type influence the functional response of damselfly nymphs.
Uiterwaal SF; Mares C; DeLong JP
Oecologia; 2017 Nov; 185(3):339-346. PubMed ID: 28936547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Allometric functional response model: body masses constrain interaction strengths.
Vucic-Pestic O; Rall BC; Kalinkat G; Brose U
J Anim Ecol; 2010 Jan; 79(1):249-56. PubMed ID: 19845811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What drives interaction strengths in complex food webs? A test with feeding rates of a generalist stream predator.
Preston DL; Henderson JS; Falke LP; Segui LM; Layden TJ; Novak M
Ecology; 2018 Jul; 99(7):1591-1601. PubMed ID: 29738085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prey Limitation Drives Variation in Allometric Scaling of Predator-Prey Interactions.
Costa-Pereira R; Araújo MS; Olivier RDS; Souza FL; Rudolf VHW
Am Nat; 2018 Oct; 192(4):E139-E149. PubMed ID: 30205026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prey body mass and richness underlie the persistence of a top predator.
Guzman LM; Srivastava DS
Proc Biol Sci; 2019 May; 286(1902):20190622. PubMed ID: 31064301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Seasonal shifts in predator body size diversity and trophic interactions in size-structured predator-prey systems.
Rudolf VH
J Anim Ecol; 2012 May; 81(3):524-32. PubMed ID: 22191419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Local genetic adaptation generates latitude-specific effects of warming on predator-prey interactions.
De Block M; Pauwels K; Van Den Broeck M; De Meester L; Stoks R
Glob Chang Biol; 2013 Mar; 19(3):689-96. PubMed ID: 23504827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Foraging theory predicts predator-prey energy fluxes.
Brose U; Ehnes RB; Rall BC; Vucic-Pestic O; Berlow EL; Scheu S
J Anim Ecol; 2008 Sep; 77(5):1072-8. PubMed ID: 18540967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predator-prey size relationships in an African large-mammal food web.
Owen-Smith N; Mills MG
J Anim Ecol; 2008 Jan; 77(1):173-83. PubMed ID: 18177336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Body masses, functional responses and predator-prey stability.
Kalinkat G; Schneider FD; Digel C; Guill C; Rall BC; Brose U
Ecol Lett; 2013 Sep; 16(9):1126-34. PubMed ID: 23819684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Potential impact of low-concentration silver nanoparticles on predator-prey interactions between predatory dragonfly nymphs and Daphnia magna as a prey.
Pokhrel LR; Dubey B
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jul; 46(14):7755-62. PubMed ID: 22697289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Foraging and vulnerability traits modify predator-prey body mass allometry: freshwater macroinvertebrates as a case study.
Klecka J; Boukal DS
J Anim Ecol; 2013 Sep; 82(5):1031-41. PubMed ID: 23869526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trait-mediated functional responses: predator behavioural type mediates prey consumption.
Toscano BJ; Griffen BD
J Anim Ecol; 2014 Nov; 83(6):1469-77. PubMed ID: 24749626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Beyond body mass: how prey traits improve predictions of functional response parameters.
Kalinoski RM; DeLong JP
Oecologia; 2016 Feb; 180(2):543-50. PubMed ID: 26552379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Foraging strategy mediates ectotherm predator-prey responses to climate warming.
Twardochleb LA; Treakle TC; Zarnetske PL
Ecology; 2020 Nov; 101(11):e03146. PubMed ID: 32726861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reciprocity in predator-prey interactions: exposure to defended prey and predation risk affects intermediate predator life history and morphology.
Hammill E; Beckerman AP
Oecologia; 2010 May; 163(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 19936795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Consequences of size structure in the prey for predator-prey dynamics: the composite functional response.
Rudolf VH
J Anim Ecol; 2008 May; 77(3):520-8. PubMed ID: 18284478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predator identity and the nature and strength of food web interactions.
Henry LM; Bannerman JA; Gillespie DR; Roitberg BD
J Anim Ecol; 2010 Nov; 79(6):1164-71. PubMed ID: 20646124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Temperature alters food web body-size structure.
Gibert JP; DeLong JP
Biol Lett; 2014 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 25165457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Food-web interaction strength distributions are conserved by greater variation between than within predator-prey pairs.
Preston DL; Falke LP; Henderson JS; Novak M
Ecology; 2019 Oct; 100(10):e02816. PubMed ID: 31287561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
