666 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28936630)
1. The clinical outcomes and risk factors associated with incomplete endoscopic resection of rectal carcinoid tumor.
Choi CW; Park SB; Kang DH; Kim HW; Kim SJ; Nam HS; Ryu DG
Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5006-5011. PubMed ID: 28936630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endoloop ligation after endoscopic mucosal resection using a transparent cap: A novel method to treat small rectal carcinoid tumors.
Zhang DG; Luo S; Xiong F; Xu ZL; Li YX; Yao J; Wang LS
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Mar; 25(10):1259-1265. PubMed ID: 30886508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment outcomes of endoscopic resection for rectal carcinoid tumors: an analysis of the resectability and long-term results from 46 consecutive cases.
Kaneko H; Hirasawa K; Koh R; Kobayashi R; Kokawa A; Tanaka K; Maeda S
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Dec; 51(12):1489-1494. PubMed ID: 27687741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of endoscopic therapies for rectal carcinoid tumors: Endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential incision versus endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Zhang J; Liu M; Li H; Chen J; Su H; Zheng J; Lin G; Lei X
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 42(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 28750769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection With Circumferential Incision and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Rectal Carcinoid Tumor.
Chen R; Liu X; Sun S; Wang S; Ge N; Wang G; Guo J
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2016 Jun; 26(3):e56-61. PubMed ID: 27213787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of endoscopic resection therapies for rectal carcinoid tumor: endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection using band ligation.
Choi CW; Kang DH; Kim HW; Park SB; Jo WS; Song GA; Cho M
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2013; 47(5):432-6. PubMed ID: 23188074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endoscopic mucosal resection with a ligation device or endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal carcinoid tumors: an analysis of 24 consecutive cases.
Niimi K; Goto O; Fujishiro M; Kodashima S; Ono S; Mochizuki S; Asada-Hirayama I; Konno-Shimizu M; Mikami-Matsuda R; Minatsuki C; Yamamichi N; Koike K
Dig Endosc; 2012 Nov; 24(6):443-7. PubMed ID: 23078437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection therapies for rectal carcinoid tumors: a meta-analysis.
He L; Deng T; Luo H
Yonsei Med J; 2015 Jan; 56(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 25510749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of rectal carcinoid tumors.
Park HW; Byeon JS; Park YS; Yang DH; Yoon SM; Kim KJ; Ye BD; Myung SJ; Yang SK; Kim JH
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Jul; 72(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 20381798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of rectal carcinoid tumors 7-16 mm in diameter.
Wang X; Xiang L; Li A; Han Z; Li Y; Wang Y; Guo Y; Zuang K; Yan Q; Zhong J; Xiong J; Yang H; Liu S
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2015 Mar; 30(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 25596026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endoscopic submucosal dissection or conventional endoscopic mucosal resection is an effective and safe treatment for rectal carcinoid tumors: a retrospective study.
Baek IH
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2010 May; 20(4):329-31. PubMed ID: 20438309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of endoscopic treatments in rectal carcinoid tumors.
Lee HJ; Kim SB; Shin CM; Seo AY; Lee DH; Kim N; Park YS; Yoon H
Surg Endosc; 2016 Aug; 30(8):3491-8. PubMed ID: 26514133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal carcinoid tumors: comparison with endoscopic mucosal resection.
Lee DS; Jeon SW; Park SY; Jung MK; Cho CM; Tak WY; Kweon YO; Kim SK
Endoscopy; 2010 Aug; 42(8):647-51. PubMed ID: 20669076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application value of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of rectal carcinoids.
Li X; Gui Y; Han W; Jiang H; Qi D; Yang Y
J Cancer Res Ther; 2016 Oct; 12(Supplement):43-46. PubMed ID: 27721251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device for removing small rectal carcinoid tumor compared with endoscopic mucosal resection: analysis of 100 cases.
Kim HH; Park SJ; Lee SH; Park HU; Song CS; Park MI; Moon W
Dig Endosc; 2012 May; 24(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 22507089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment outcomes according to endoscopic treatment modalities for rectal carcinoid tumors.
Kim KM; Eo SJ; Shim SG; Choi JH; Min BH; Lee JH; Chang DK; Kim YH; Rhee PL; Kim JJ; Rhee JC; Kim JY
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol; 2013 Jun; 37(3):275-82. PubMed ID: 22959100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endoscopic mucosal resection with suction vs. endoscopic submucosal dissection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a meta-analysis.
Pan J; Zhang X; Shi Y; Pei Q
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Sep; 53(9):1139-1145. PubMed ID: 30193543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal carcinoid tumor. A meta-analysis and meta-regression with single-arm analysis.
Yong JN; Lim XC; Nistala KRY; Lim LKE; Lim GEH; Quek J; Tham HY; Wong NW; Tan KK; Chong CS
J Dig Dis; 2021 Oct; 22(10):562-571. PubMed ID: 34472210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumor.
Kim J; Kim JH; Lee JY; Chun J; Im JP; Kim JS
BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):77. PubMed ID: 29866049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus transanal local excision for rectal carcinoid: a comparative study.
Yan FH; Lou Z; Hu SJ; Xu XD; Wang H; Wang HT; Meng RG; Fu CG; Zhang W; He J; Yu ED
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 14(1):162. PubMed ID: 27324379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]