These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28936638)

  • 1. Examining reproducibility in psychology: A hybrid method for combining a statistically significant original study and a replication.
    van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1515-1539. PubMed ID: 28936638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian evaluation of effect size after replicating an original study.
    van Aert RC; van Assen MA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175302. PubMed ID: 28388646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Bayesian Perspective on the Reproducibility Project: Psychology.
    Etz A; Vandekerckhove J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149794. PubMed ID: 26919473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What Should Researchers Expect When They Replicate Studies? A Statistical View of Replicability in Psychological Science.
    Patil P; Peng RD; Leek JT
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2016 Jul; 11(4):539-44. PubMed ID: 27474140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.
    Open Science Collaboration
    Science; 2015 Aug; 349(6251):aac4716. PubMed ID: 26315443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meta-analysis using effect size distributions of only statistically significant studies.
    van Assen MA; van Aert RC; Wicherts JM
    Psychol Methods; 2015 Sep; 20(3):293-309. PubMed ID: 25401773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Replication of null results: Absence of evidence or evidence of absence?
    Pawel S; Heyard R; Micheloud C; Held L
    Elife; 2024 May; 12():. PubMed ID: 38739437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research.
    Stanley TD; Carter EC; Doucouliagos H
    Psychol Bull; 2018 Dec; 144(12):1325-1346. PubMed ID: 30321017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The unappreciated heterogeneity of effect sizes: Implications for power, precision, planning of research, and replication.
    Kenny DA; Judd CM
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):578-589. PubMed ID: 30742474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conducting Meta-Analyses Based on p Values: Reservations and Recommendations for Applying p-Uniform and p-Curve.
    van Aert RC; Wicherts JM; van Assen MA
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2016 Sep; 11(5):713-729. PubMed ID: 27694466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychology, Science, and Knowledge Construction: Broadening Perspectives from the Replication Crisis.
    Shrout PE; Rodgers JL
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2018 Jan; 69():487-510. PubMed ID: 29300688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibility.
    Van Bavel JJ; Mende-Siedlecki P; Brady WJ; Reinero DA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jun; 113(23):6454-9. PubMed ID: 27217556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Addressing the "Replication Crisis": Using Original Studies to Design Replication Studies with Appropriate Statistical Power.
    Anderson SF; Maxwell SE
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(3):305-324. PubMed ID: 28266872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reflections on the origins of meta-analysis.
    Rosenthal R
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Sep; 6(3):240-5. PubMed ID: 26355797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical analyses for studying replication: Meta-analytic perspectives.
    Hedges LV; Schauer JM
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):557-570. PubMed ID: 30070547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Replicator degrees of freedom allow publication of misleading failures to replicate.
    Bryan CJ; Yeager DS; O'Brien JM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Dec; 116(51):25535-25545. PubMed ID: 31767750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Failure of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing When Studying Incremental Changes, and What to Do About It.
    Gelman A
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2018 Jan; 44(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 28914154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Power dressing and meta-analysis: incorporating power analysis into meta-analysis.
    Muncer S; Taylor S; Craigie M
    J Adv Nurs; 2002 May; 38(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 11972663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing the accuracy of experimental estimates to guessing: a new perspective on replication and the "Crisis of Confidence" in psychology.
    Davis-Stober CP; Dana J
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Mar; 46(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 23661222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects.
    Kvarven A; Strømland E; Johannesson M
    Nat Hum Behav; 2020 Apr; 4(4):423-434. PubMed ID: 31873200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.