258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28936715)
1. Comparing Different Partograph Designs for Use in Standard Labor Care: A Pilot Randomized Trial.
Lee NJ; Neal J; Lowe NK; Kildea SV
Matern Child Health J; 2018 Mar; 22(3):355-363. PubMed ID: 28936715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pilot Study of Physiologic Partograph Use Among Low-Risk, Nulliparous Women With Spontaneous Labor Onset.
Neal JL; Lowe NK; Nacht AS; Koschoreck K; Anderson J
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2016; 61(2):235-41. PubMed ID: 26917257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing compliance with commencement and use of two partograph designs for women in active labour: A randomised controlled trial.
Lee N; Flynn J; Gao Y; Kildea S
Women Birth; 2023 Feb; 36(1):e17-e24. PubMed ID: 35400605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of partogram use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labour at term.
Lavender T; Hart A; Smyth RM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Oct; (4):CD005461. PubMed ID: 18843690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The frequency of intrapartum caesarean section use with the WHO partograph versus Zhang's guideline in the Labour Progression Study (LaPS): a multicentre, cluster-randomised controlled trial.
Bernitz S; Dalbye R; Zhang J; Eggebø TM; Frøslie KF; Olsen IC; Blix E; Øian P
Lancet; 2019 Jan; 393(10169):340-348. PubMed ID: 30581039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of partogram use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labour at term.
Lavender T; Hart A; Smyth RM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Jul; (7):CD005461. PubMed ID: 23843091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of partogram use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labour at term.
Lavender T; Hart A; Smyth RM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Aug; 8(8):CD005461. PubMed ID: 22895950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Physiologic partograph to improve birth safety and outcomes among low-risk, nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset.
Neal JL; Lowe NK
Med Hypotheses; 2012 Feb; 78(2):319-26. PubMed ID: 22138426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized controlled trial of labor outcomes with action line placement at 2 hours versus 4 hours on the partograph.
Orhue A; Oseihie II; Aziken M; Ande B
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2020 Jul; 150(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 32301113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The labour scale--assessment of the validity of a novel labour chart: a pilot study.
Shazly SA; Embaby LH; Ali SS
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Aug; 54(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 24835694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness of an Electronic Partogram: A Mixed-Method, Quasi-Experimental Study Among Skilled Birth Attendants in Kenya.
Sanghvi H; Mohan D; Litwin L; Bazant E; Gomez P; MacDowell T; Onsase L; Wabwile V; Waka C; Qureshi Z; Omanga E; Gichangi A; Muia R
Glob Health Sci Pract; 2019 Dec; 7(4):521-539. PubMed ID: 31874937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of World Health Organization partograph implementation by midwives for maternity home birth in Medan, Indonesia.
Fahdhy M; Chongsuvivatwong V
Midwifery; 2005 Dec; 21(4):301-10. PubMed ID: 16076515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Management of Spontaneous Labor in Primigravidae: Labor Scale versus WHO Partograph (SLiP Trial) Randomized Controlled Trial.
Tolba SM; Ali SS; Mohammed AM; Michael AK; Abbas AM; Nassr AA; Shazly SA
Am J Perinatol; 2018 Jan; 35(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 28787749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of timing of admission in labour and management of labour on method of birth: results from a randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery (COSMOS trial).
Davey MA; McLachlan HL; Forster D; Flood M
Midwifery; 2013 Dec; 29(12):1297-302. PubMed ID: 23890679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Feasibility and effectiveness of electronic vs. paper partograph on improving birth outcomes: A prospective crossover study design.
Rahman A; Begum T; Ashraf F; Akhter S; Hoque DME; Ghosh TK; Rahman M; Stekelenburg J; Das SK; Fatima P; Anwar I
PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0222314. PubMed ID: 31589625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Partograph as a tool for team work management of spontaneous labor.
Orhue A; Aziken ME; Osemwenkha AP
Niger J Clin Pract; 2012; 15(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 22437079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An investigation into the feasibility of comparing three management options (augmentation, conservative and water) for nulliparae with dystocia in the first stage of labour.
Cluett ER; Pickering RM; Brooking JI
Midwifery; 2001 Mar; 17(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 11207103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomised controlled trial of labouring in water compared with standard of augmentation for management of dystocia in first stage of labour.
Cluett ER; Pickering RM; Getliffe K; St George Saunders NJ
BMJ; 2004 Feb; 328(7435):314. PubMed ID: 14744822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is Prolonged Labor Managed Adequately in Rural Rwandan Hospitals?
Kalisa R; Rulisa S; van den Akker T; van Roosmalen J
Afr J Reprod Health; 2019 Jun; 23(2):27-34. PubMed ID: 31433591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accelerated Titration of Oxytocin in Nulliparous Women with Labour Dystocia: Results of the ACTION Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
Dy J; Rainey J; Walker MC; Fraser W; Smith GN; White RR; Waddell P; Janoudi G; Corsi DJ; Wei SQ
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Jun; 40(6):690-697. PubMed ID: 29276166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
