BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

502 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28936876)

  • 1. Evaluation of an internet-based speech-in-noise screening test for school-age children.
    Sheikh Rashid M; Dreschler WA; de Laat JAPM
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):967-975. PubMed ID: 28936876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 1: test evaluation for noise-induced hearing loss identification.
    Leensen MC; de Laat JA; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):823-34. PubMed ID: 21988504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
    Wardenga N; Batsoulis C; Wagener KC; Brand T; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 3: test sensitivity for uncontrolled parameters in domestic usage.
    Leensen MC; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Oct; 52(10):658-69. PubMed ID: 23819619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. School-Age Hearing Screening Based on Speech-in-Noise Perception Using the Digit Triplet Test.
    Denys S; Hofmann M; Luts H; Guérin C; Keymeulen A; Van Hoeck K; van Wieringen A; Hoppenbrouwers K; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(6):1104-1115. PubMed ID: 29557793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laboratory evaluation of an optimised internet-based speech-in-noise test for occupational high-frequency hearing loss screening: Occupational Earcheck.
    Sheikh Rashid M; Leensen MCJ; de Laat JAPM; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):844-853. PubMed ID: 28587489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The applicability of a speech-in-noise screening test in occupational hearing conservation.
    Leensen MC; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):455-65. PubMed ID: 23772828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and validation of a smartphone-based digits-in-noise hearing test in South African English.
    Potgieter JM; Swanepoel de W; Myburgh HC; Hopper TC; Smits C
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):405-11. PubMed ID: 27121117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The digits-in-noise test: assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise.
    Smits C; Theo Goverts S; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1693-706. PubMed ID: 23464039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise.
    Puglisi GE; Warzybok A; Hochmuth S; Visentin C; Astolfi A; Prodi N; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():44-50. PubMed ID: 26371592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 2: improving test sensitivity for noise-induced hearing loss.
    Leensen MC; de Laat JA; Snik AF; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):835-48. PubMed ID: 21970351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of the Russian matrix sentence test.
    Warzybok A; Zokoll M; Wardenga N; Ozimek E; Boboshko M; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():35-43. PubMed ID: 25843088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age Dependence of Thresholds for Speech in Noise in Normal-Hearing Adolescents.
    Jacobi I; Sheikh Rashid M; de Laat JAPM; Dreschler WA
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517743641. PubMed ID: 29212433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test.
    Zokoll MA; Fidan D; Türkyılmaz D; Hochmuth S; Ergenç İ; Sennaroğlu G; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():51-61. PubMed ID: 26443486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise.
    Hochmuth S; Brand T; Zokoll MA; Castro FZ; Wardenga N; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jul; 51(7):536-44. PubMed ID: 22537033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests.
    Hochmuth S; Kollmeier B; Brand T; Jürgens T
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():62-70. PubMed ID: 26097982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The French digit triplet test: a hearing screening tool for speech intelligibility in noise.
    Jansen S; Luts H; Wagener KC; Frachet B; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2010 May; 49(5):378-87. PubMed ID: 20380611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Audiometric characteristics of a Dutch family with Muckle-Wells syndrome.
    Weegerink NJ; Schraders M; Leijendeckers J; Slieker K; Huygen PL; Hoefsloot L; Oostrik J; Pennings RJ; Simon A; Snik A; Kremer H; Kunst HP
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):243-51. PubMed ID: 21810457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech Recognition in Noise Using Binaural Diotic and Antiphasic Digits-in-Noise in Children: Maturation and Self-Test Validity.
    Wolmarans J; De Sousa KC; Frisby C; Mahomed-Asmail F; Smits C; Moore DR; Swanepoel W
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 May; 32(5):315-323. PubMed ID: 34375996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Test-retest reliability of the Toy Discrimination Test with a masker of noise or babble in children with hearing impairment.
    Lovett R; Summerfield Q; Vickers D
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):377-84. PubMed ID: 23516964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.