580 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28937328)
1. Biomechanical effects of hybrid stabilization on the risk of proximal adjacent-segment degeneration following lumbar spinal fusion using an interspinous device or a pedicle screw-based dynamic fixator.
Lee CH; Kim YE; Lee HJ; Kim DG; Kim CH
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Dec; 27(6):643-649. PubMed ID: 28937328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical evaluation of a new pedicle screw-based posterior dynamic stabilization device (Awesome Rod System)--a finite element analysis.
Chen CS; Huang CH; Shih SL
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Apr; 16():81. PubMed ID: 25880231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determination of the biomechanical effect of an interspinous process device on implanted and adjacent lumbar spinal segments using a hybrid testing protocol: a finite-element study.
Erbulut DU; Zafarparandeh I; Hassan CR; Lazoglu I; Ozer AF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Aug; 23(2):200-8. PubMed ID: 25932601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hybrid dynamic stabilization: a biomechanical assessment of adjacent and supraadjacent levels of the lumbar spine.
Mageswaran P; Techy F; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Sep; 17(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 22839756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical effect of interspinous dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion on range of motion of the transition segment and the adjacent segment.
Kong C; Lu S; Hai Y; Zang L
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 May; 30(4):355-9. PubMed ID: 25779689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical analysis of a newly developed interspinous process device conjunction with interbody cage based on a finite element model.
Bae IS; Bak KH; Chun HJ; Ryu JI; Park SJ; Lee SJ
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243771. PubMed ID: 33306706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical analysis of lumbar nonfusion dynamic stabilization using a pedicle screw-based dynamic stabilizer or an interspinous process spacer.
Fan W; Zhang C; Zhang DX; Guo LX; Zhang M
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2022 Nov; 38(11):e3645. PubMed ID: 36054421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical comparison of an interspinous device and a rigid stabilization on lumbar adjacent segment range of motion.
Hartmann F; Dietz SO; Kuhn S; Hely H; Rommens PM; Gercek E
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2011; 78(5):404-9. PubMed ID: 22094153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical evaluation of strategies for adjacent segment disease after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: is the extension of pedicle screws necessary?
Liang Z; Cui J; Zhang J; He J; Tang J; Ren H; Ye L; Liang D; Jiang X
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Feb; 21(1):117. PubMed ID: 32085708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical Analysis of Different Lumbar Interspinous Process Devices: A Finite Element Study.
Shen H; Fogel GR; Zhu J; Liao Z; Liu W
World Neurosurg; 2019 Jul; 127():e1112-e1119. PubMed ID: 30980982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Properties of an interspinous fixation device (ISD) in lumbar fusion constructs: a biomechanical study.
Techy F; Mageswaran P; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):572-9. PubMed ID: 23498926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical Evaluation of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Coflex-F and Pedicle Screw Fixation: Finite Element Analysis of Static and Vibration Conditions.
Zhu J; Shen H; Cui Y; Fogel GR; Liao Z; Liu W
Orthop Surg; 2022 Sep; 14(9):2339-2349. PubMed ID: 35946442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical comparison of an interspinous fusion device and bilateral pedicle screw system as additional fixation for lateral lumbar interbody fusion.
Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Lee WE; Vrionis FD
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Feb; 30(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 25577548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of lordosis on adjacent levels after lumbar interbody fusion, before and after removal of the spinal fixator: a finite element analysis.
Tsuang FY; Tsai JC; Lai DM
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Oct; 20(1):470. PubMed ID: 31651312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Immediate biomechanical effects of lumbar posterior dynamic stabilization above a circumferential fusion.
Cheng BC; Gordon J; Cheng J; Welch WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):2551-7. PubMed ID: 17978653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The protective role of dynamic stabilization on the adjacent disc to a rigid instrumented level. An in vitro biomechanical analysis.
Cabello J; Cavanilles-Walker JM; Iborra M; Ubierna MT; Covaro A; Roca J
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2013 Apr; 133(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 23371399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Junction kinematics between proximal mobile and distal fused lumbar segments: biomechanical analysis of pedicle and hook constructs.
Hongo M; Gay RE; Zhao KD; Ilharreborde B; Huddleston PM; Berglund LJ; An KN; Zhao C
Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):846-53. PubMed ID: 19660990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical effect of interspinous process distraction height after lumbar fixation surgery: An in vitro model.
Fu L; Ma J; Lu B; Jia H; Zhao J; Kuang M; Feng R; Xu L; Bai H; Sun L; Wang Y; Ma X
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2017 Jul; 231(7):663-672. PubMed ID: 28410566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical analysis of lateral interbody fusion strategies for adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine.
Metzger MF; Robinson ST; Maldonado RC; Rawlinson J; Liu J; Acosta FL
Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):1004-1011. PubMed ID: 28323239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
