566 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28938728)
21. Transgender men's experiences of fertility preservation: a qualitative study.
Armuand G; Dhejne C; Olofsson JI; Rodriguez-Wallberg KA
Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 32(2):383-390. PubMed ID: 27999119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Live births following fertility preservation using in-vitro maturation of ovarian tissue oocytes.
Segers I; Bardhi E; Mateizel I; Van Moer E; Schots R; Verheyen G; Tournaye H; De Vos M
Hum Reprod; 2020 Sep; 35(9):2026-2036. PubMed ID: 32829388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Modified natural cycle versus controlled ovarian hyperstimulation IVF: a cost-effectiveness evaluation of three simulated treatment scenarios.
Groen H; Tonch N; Simons AH; van der Veen F; Hoek A; Land JA
Hum Reprod; 2013 Dec; 28(12):3236-46. PubMed ID: 24166594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cost-effectiveness analysis of lifestyle intervention in obese infertile women.
van Oers AM; Mutsaerts MAQ; Burggraaff JM; Kuchenbecker WKH; Perquin DAM; Koks CAM; van Golde R; Kaaijk EM; Schierbeek JM; Klijn NF; van Kasteren YM; Land JA; Mol BWJ; Hoek A; Groen H;
Hum Reprod; 2017 Jul; 32(7):1418-1426. PubMed ID: 28486704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. ESHRE guideline: female fertility preservation.
; Anderson RA; Amant F; Braat D; D'Angelo A; Chuva de Sousa Lopes SM; Demeestere I; Dwek S; Frith L; Lambertini M; Maslin C; Moura-Ramos M; Nogueira D; Rodriguez-Wallberg K; Vermeulen N
Hum Reprod Open; 2020; 2020(4):hoaa052. PubMed ID: 33225079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evidence-based outcomes after oocyte cryopreservation for donor oocyte in vitro fertilization and planned oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline.
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: asrm@asrm.org
Fertil Steril; 2021 Jul; 116(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 34148587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Random start ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation appears unlikely to delay initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.
Letourneau JM; Sinha N; Wald K; Harris E; Quinn M; Imbar T; Mok-Lin E; Chien AJ; Rosen M
Hum Reprod; 2017 Oct; 32(10):2123-2129. PubMed ID: 28938748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Decision-making in female fertility preservation is balancing the expected burden of fertility preservation treatment and the wish to conceive.
Baysal Ö; Bastings L; Beerendonk CC; Postma SA; IntHout J; Verhaak CM; Braat DD; Nelen WL
Hum Reprod; 2015 Jul; 30(7):1625-34. PubMed ID: 26034191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reproductive choices and outcomes after freezing oocytes for medical reasons: a follow-up study.
Dahhan T; Dancet EA; Miedema DV; van der Veen F; Goddijn M
Hum Reprod; 2014 Sep; 29(9):1925-30. PubMed ID: 24951490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Should we perform oocyte accumulation to preserve fertility in women with Turner syndrome? A multicenter study and systematic review of the literature.
Brouillet S; Ranisavljevic N; Sonigo C; Haquet E; Bringer-Deutsch S; Loup-Cabaniols V; Hamamah S; Willems M; Anahory T
Hum Reprod; 2023 Sep; 38(9):1733-1745. PubMed ID: 37381072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Update on fertility preservation from the Barcelona International Society for Fertility Preservation-ESHRE-ASRM 2015 expert meeting: indications, results and future perspectives.
Martinez F;
Fertil Steril; 2017 Sep; 108(3):407-415.e11. PubMed ID: 28739117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. What threshold values of antral follicle count and serum AMH levels should be considered for oocyte cryopreservation after in vitro maturation?
Sonigo C; Simon C; Boubaya M; Benoit A; Sifer C; Sermondade N; Grynberg M
Hum Reprod; 2016 Jul; 31(7):1493-500. PubMed ID: 27165625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Baby budgeting: oocyte cryopreservation in women delaying reproduction can reduce cost per live birth.
Devine K; Mumford SL; Goldman KN; Hodes-Wertz B; Druckenmiller S; Propst AM; Noyes N
Fertil Steril; 2015 Jun; 103(6):1446-53.e1-2. PubMed ID: 25813281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A SART data cost-effectiveness analysis of planned oocyte cryopreservation versus in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy considering ideal family size.
Bakkensen JB; Flannagan KSJ; Mumford SL; Hutchinson AP; Cheung EO; Moreno PI; Jordan N; Feinberg EC; Goldman KN
Fertil Steril; 2022 Nov; 118(5):875-884. PubMed ID: 36175208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue for fertility preservation in a large cohort of young girls: focus on pubertal development.
Jensen AK; Rechnitzer C; Macklon KT; Ifversen MR; Birkebæk N; Clausen N; Sørensen K; Fedder J; Ernst E; Andersen CY
Hum Reprod; 2017 Jan; 32(1):154-164. PubMed ID: 27816923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The safety and efficacy of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for fertility preservation in women with early breast cancer: a systematic review.
Rodgers RJ; Reid GD; Koch J; Deans R; Ledger WL; Friedlander M; Gilchrist RB; Walters KA; Abbott JA
Hum Reprod; 2017 May; 32(5):1033-1045. PubMed ID: 28333356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Response to ovarian stimulation is not impacted by a breast cancer diagnosis.
Quinn MM; Cakmak H; Letourneau JM; Cedars MI; Rosen MP
Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):568-574. PubMed ID: 28122888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?
Drakopoulos P; Blockeel C; Stoop D; Camus M; de Vos M; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):370-6. PubMed ID: 26724797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Oocyte vitrification for elective fertility preservation: the past, present, and future.
Gunnala V; Schattman G
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 29(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 27922944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Emergency IVF for embryo freezing to preserve female fertility: a French multicentre cohort study.
Courbiere B; Decanter C; Bringer-Deutsch S; Rives N; Mirallié S; Pech JC; De Ziegler D; Carré-Pigeon F; May-Panloup P; Sifer C; Amice V; Schweitzer T; Porcu-Buisson G; Poirot C;
Hum Reprod; 2013 Sep; 28(9):2381-8. PubMed ID: 23832792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
