565 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28938751)
1. New permeable cryoprotectant-free vitrification method for native human sperm.
Aizpurua J; Medrano L; Enciso M; Sarasa J; Romero A; Fernández MA; Gómez-Torres MJ
Hum Reprod; 2017 Oct; 32(10):2007-2015. PubMed ID: 28938751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved cryopreservation of spermatozoa using vitrification: comparison of cryoprotectants and a novel device for long-term storage.
O'Neill HC; Nikoloska M; Ho H; Doshi A; Maalouf W
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Aug; 36(8):1713-1720. PubMed ID: 31273587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa by vitrification versus conventional rapid freezing: Effects on motility, viability, morphology and cellular defects.
Le MT; Nguyen TTT; Nguyen TT; Nguyen VT; Nguyen TTA; Nguyen VQH; Cao NT
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Mar; 234():14-20. PubMed ID: 30640121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vitrification and conventional freezing methods in sperm cryopreservation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li YX; Zhou L; Lv MQ; Ge P; Liu YC; Zhou DX
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Feb; 233():84-92. PubMed ID: 30580229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving native human sperm freezing protection by using a modified vitrification method.
Zhou D; Wang XM; Li RX; Wang YZ; Chao YC; Liu ZZ; Huang ZH; Nie HC; Zhu WB; Tan YQ; Fan LQ
Asian J Androl; 2021; 23(1):91-96. PubMed ID: 32567578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Large volume cryoprotectant-free vitrification: an alternative to conventional cryopreservation for human spermatozoa.
Slabbert M; du Plessis SS; Huyser C
Andrologia; 2015 Jun; 47(5):594-9. PubMed ID: 25040423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cryopreservation of rabbit semen: comparing the effects of different cryoprotectants, cryoprotectant-free vitrification, and the use of albumin plus osmoprotectants on sperm survival and fertility after standard vapor freezing and vitrification.
Rosato MP; Iaffaldano N
Theriogenology; 2013 Feb; 79(3):508-16. PubMed ID: 23218394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of Slow Freezing and Vitrification of Human Semen on Post-Thaw Semen Quality and miRNA Expression.
Podgrajsek R; Bolha L; Pungert T; Pizem J; Jazbec K; Malicev E; Stimpfel M
Int J Mol Sci; 2024 Apr; 25(8):. PubMed ID: 38673743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vitrification is not superior to rapid freezing of normozoospermic spermatozoa: effects on sperm parameters, DNA fragmentation and hyaluronan binding.
Agha-Rahimi A; Khalili MA; Nabi A; Ashourzadeh S
Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Mar; 28(3):352-8. PubMed ID: 24444814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative analysis between slow freezing and ultra-rapid freezing for human sperm cryopreservation.
Riva NS; Ruhlmann C; Iaizzo RS; Marcial López CA; Martínez AG
JBRA Assist Reprod; 2018 Nov; 22(4):331-337. PubMed ID: 30132630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Density gradient centrifugation prior to cryopreservation and hypotaurine supplementation improve post-thaw quality of sperm from infertile men with oligoasthenoteratozoospermia.
Brugnon F; Ouchchane L; Pons-Rejraji H; Artonne C; Farigoule M; Janny L
Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2045-57. PubMed ID: 23760160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cryopreservation of Low Number of Human Spermatozoa; Which is Better: Vapor Phase or Direct Submerging in Liquid Nitrogen?
Hosseini A; Khalili MA; Talebi AR; Agha-Rahimi A; Ghasemi-Esmailabad S; Woodward B; Yari N
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2019 Jun; 22(2):126-132. PubMed ID: 29749276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A novel solution for freezing small numbers of spermatozoa using a sperm vitrification device.
Berkovitz A; Miller N; Silberman M; Belenky M; Itsykson P
Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 33(11):1975-1983. PubMed ID: 30285105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cryoprotectant-free vitrification of human spermatozoa in large (up to 0.5 mL) volume: a novel technology.
Isachenko V; Maettner R; Petrunkina AM; Mallmann P; Rahimi G; Sterzik K; Sanchez R; Risopatron J; Damjanoski I; Isachenko E
Clin Lab; 2011; 57(9-10):643-50. PubMed ID: 22029178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Positive effect of progesterone on motility and velocity of fresh, vitrified without permeable cryoprotectants and frozen with permeable cryoprotectants human spermatozoa.
Saymé N; Dite L; Krebs T; Kljajić M; Maas DHA
Andrologia; 2018 Dec; 50(10):e13133. PubMed ID: 30225900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conventional freezing vs. cryoprotectant-free vitrification of epididymal (MESA) and testicular (TESE) spermatozoa: Three live births.
Spis E; Bushkovskaia A; Isachenko E; Todorov P; Sanchez R; Skopets V; Isachenko V
Cryobiology; 2019 Oct; 90():100-102. PubMed ID: 31419408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repeated vitrification/warming of human sperm gives better results than repeated slow programmable freezing.
Vutyavanich T; Lattiwongsakorn W; Piromlertamorn W; Samchimchom S
Asian J Androl; 2012 Nov; 14(6):850-4. PubMed ID: 23064685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Morphological, ultrastructural and functional imaging of frozen/thawed and vitrified/warmed human ovarian tissue retrieved from oncological patients.
Fabbri R; Vicenti R; Macciocca M; Martino NA; Dell'Aquila ME; Pasquinelli G; Morselli-Labate AM; Seracchioli R; Paradisi R
Hum Reprod; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1838-49. PubMed ID: 27282911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study.
Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Edgar DH; Sullivan EA
Hum Reprod; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2794-801. PubMed ID: 25316444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effectiveness of human spermatozoa biomarkers as indicators of structural damage during cryopreservation.
Gómez-Torres MJ; Medrano L; Romero A; Fernández-Colom PJ; Aizpurúa J
Cryobiology; 2017 Oct; 78():90-94. PubMed ID: 28641947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
