These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28939202)

  • 1. Neural correlates of reconfiguration failure reveal the time course of task-set reconfiguration.
    Steinhauser M; Maier ME; Ernst B
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Nov; 106():100-111. PubMed ID: 28939202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Task reconfiguration and carryover in task switching: an event-related potential study.
    Hsieh S; Cheng P
    Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 1084(1):132-45. PubMed ID: 16647689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Signaling a switch: neural correlates of task switching guided by task cues and transition cues.
    West R; Langley MM; Bailey K
    Psychophysiology; 2011 May; 48(5):612-23. PubMed ID: 20840196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrophysiological correlates of residual switch costs.
    Gajewski PD; Kleinsorge T; Falkenstein M
    Cortex; 2010 Oct; 46(9):1138-48. PubMed ID: 19717147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. At will or not at will: Electrophysiological correlates of preparation for voluntary and instructed task-switching paradigms.
    Chen P; Hsieh S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1389-402. PubMed ID: 25522908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using advance information in dynamic cognitive control: an ERP study of task-switching.
    Swainson R; Jackson SR; Jackson GM
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 16626653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preparatory brain activity in dual-tasking.
    Steinhauser R; Steinhauser M
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jun; 114():32-40. PubMed ID: 29680251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Not inertia but reconfiguration: Asymmetric switch cost in a hierarchical task.
    Li J; Cao B; Han J; Xie L; Li F
    Brain Res; 2019 Oct; 1720():146291. PubMed ID: 31199907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural correlates of cue retrieval, task set reconfiguration, and rule mapping in the explicit cue task switching paradigm.
    Travers S; West R
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Jul; 45(4):588-601. PubMed ID: 18282198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Common mechanisms in error monitoring and action effect monitoring.
    Steinhauser R; Wirth R; Kunde W; Janczyk M; Steinhauser M
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 18(6):1159-1171. PubMed ID: 30069791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neurophysiological signature of effective anticipatory task-set control: a task-switching investigation.
    Lavric A; Mizon GA; Monsell S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Sep; 28(5):1016-29. PubMed ID: 18717737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Error positivity is related to attentional control of task switching.
    Tanaka H
    Neuroreport; 2009 May; 20(8):820-4. PubMed ID: 19384255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are voluntary switches corrected repetitions?
    Vandamme K; Szmalec A; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Nov; 47(6):1176-81. PubMed ID: 20456659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dissociating stimulus-set and response-set in the context of task-set switching.
    Kieffaber PD; Kruschke JK; Cho RY; Walker PM; Hetrick WP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):700-19. PubMed ID: 22984990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Switching, plasticity, and prediction in a saccadic task-switch paradigm.
    Barton JJ; Greenzang C; Hefter R; Edelman J; Manoach DS
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):76-87. PubMed ID: 16096781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discrepancy of neural response between exogenous and endogenous task switching: an event-related potentials study.
    Miyajima M; Toyomaki A; Hashimoto N; Kusumi I; Murohashi H; Koyama T
    Neuroreport; 2012 Aug; 23(11):642-6. PubMed ID: 22713928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fractionating the cognitive control required to bring about a change in task: a dense-sensor event-related potential study.
    Astle DE; Jackson GM; Swainson R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 20(2):255-67. PubMed ID: 18275333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrophysiological correlates of preparation and implementation for different types of task shifts.
    Hsieh S; Wu M
    Brain Res; 2011 Nov; 1423():41-52. PubMed ID: 22000079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamics of task sets: evidence from dense-array event-related potentials.
    Poulsen C; Luu P; Davey C; Tucker DM
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):133-54. PubMed ID: 15922166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The nature of switch cost: task set configuration or carry-over effect?
    Hsieh S; Liu LC
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 22(2):165-75. PubMed ID: 15653291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.