These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

43 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2893980)

  • 21. D-amphetamine as a discriminative cue: drugs with similar stimulus properties.
    Schechter MD; Rosecrans JA
    Eur J Pharmacol; 1973 Feb; 21(2):212-6. PubMed ID: 4696103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Characterization of the discriminative stimulus effects of buprenorphine in pigeons.
    Galici R; Brandt MR; France CP
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Mar; 160(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 11875630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Discriminative stimulus properties of the isomers of pentobarbital and secobarbital in pigeons.
    Wenger GR
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1988 May; 245(2):389-93. PubMed ID: 3367297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine and d-amphetamine, and antagonism by haloperidol: a comparative study.
    Colpaert FC; Niemegeers CJ; Janssen PA
    Neuropharmacology; 1978 Nov; 17(11):937-42. PubMed ID: 724101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of D-amphetamine on temporal discrimination in pigeons.
    McClure EA; Saulsgiver KA; Wynne CD
    Behav Pharmacol; 2005 Jul; 16(4):193-208. PubMed ID: 15961959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Discriminative stimulus properties of midazolam are shared by a GABA-receptor positive steroid.
    Deutsch SI; Mastropaolo J
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1993 Dec; 46(4):963-5. PubMed ID: 8309977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Discriminative stimulus properties of phenytoin in the pigeon.
    Krafft K; Cleary J; Poling A
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1983; 79(1):82-3. PubMed ID: 6403970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Differential sensitivity to midazolam discriminative-stimulus effects following self-administered versus response-independent midazolam.
    Ator NA; Griffiths RR
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1993; 110(1-2):1-4. PubMed ID: 7870866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Drugs and the discrimination of duration.
    Altman JL; Appel JB; McGowan WT
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1979 Jan; 60(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 106429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of propranolol, d-amphetamine and caffeine on ethanol as a discriminative cue.
    Schechter MD
    Eur J Pharmacol; 1974 Nov; 29(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 4435044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Antagonism by baclophen of the d-amphetamine-induced disruption of a successive discrimination in the rat.
    Ahlenius S; Carlsson A; Engel J
    J Neural Transm; 1975; 36(3-4):327-33. PubMed ID: 1165490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Drug states as modulators of conditioned immobility in a latent discrimination procedure.
    Maes JH; Van Rijn CM; Vossen JM
    Eur J Pharmacol; 1996 Aug; 309(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 8874131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Discriminative stimulus properties of d-amphetamine-pentobarbital combinations.
    Witkin JM; Carter RB; Dykstra LA
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1980; 68(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 6771810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Amphetamine-induced disruption of temporal discrimination by response disinhibition.
    Robbins TW; Iversen SD
    Nat New Biol; 1973 Oct; 245(145):191-2. PubMed ID: 4517785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Drug discrimination by humans compared to nonhumans: current status and future directions.
    Kamien JB; Bickel WK; Hughes JR; Higgins ST; Smith BJ
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1993; 111(3):259-70. PubMed ID: 7870962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Trends in drug discrimination research analysed with a cross-indexed bibliography, 1984-1987.
    Stolerman IP; Rasul F; Shine PJ
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1989; 98(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 2498952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The discriminative stimulus properties of histamine H1 antagonists in d-amphetamine-trained and midazolam-trained pigeons.
    Evans SM; Johanson CE
    NIDA Res Monogr; 1987; 76():214-20. PubMed ID: 2893980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Discriminative stimulus properties of histamine H1-antagonists in animals trained to discriminate d-amphetamine or pentobarbital.
    Evans SM; Johanson CE
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1989 Sep; 250(3):779-87. PubMed ID: 2570867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Discriminative stimulus and self-reported effects of methylphenidate, d-amphetamine, and triazolam in methylphenidate-trained humans.
    Stoops WW; Lile JA; Glaser PE; Rush CR
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2005 Feb; 13(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 15727504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Discriminative stimulus properties of local anesthetics in d-amphetamine- and pentobarbital-trained pigeons.
    Zacny JP; Woolverton WL
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1989 Jul; 33(3):527-31. PubMed ID: 2587593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.