These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28940396)

  • 21. Escape from rich-to-lean transitions: Stimulus change and timeout.
    Retzlaff BJ; Parthum ET; Pitts RC; Hughes CE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Jan; 107(1):65-84. PubMed ID: 28078744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Modeling choice across time: Effects of response-reinforcer discriminability.
    Davison M; Cowie S
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2022 Jan; 117(1):36-52. PubMed ID: 34734651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Being there on time: Reinforcer effects on timing and locating.
    Cowie S; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 Mar; 113(2):340-362. PubMed ID: 31994217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Signal functions in delayed discriminative stimulus control by reinforcement sources.
    Kuroda T; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):355-72. PubMed ID: 24700527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Concurrent-schedule performance in transition: changeover delays and signaled reinforcer ratios.
    Krägeloh CU; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jan; 79(1):87-109. PubMed ID: 12696743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Concurrent schedules: discriminating reinforcer-ratio reversals at a fixed time after the previous reinforcer.
    Cowie S; Elliffe D; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Sep; 100(2):117-34. PubMed ID: 23943395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Timing or counting? Control by contingency reversals at fixed times or numbers of responses.
    Davison M; Cowie S
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(2):222-241. PubMed ID: 30945927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Suboptimal choice by pigeons is eliminated when key-pecking behavior is replaced by treadle-pressing.
    González-Torres R; Flores J; Orduña V
    Behav Processes; 2020 Sep; 178():104157. PubMed ID: 32497555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Responding during reinforcement delay in a self-control paradigm.
    Logue AW; Peña-Correal TE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 May; 41(3):267-77. PubMed ID: 6736857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Signaled alternative reinforcement and the persistence of operant behavior.
    Bland VJ; Bai JY; Fullerton JA; Podlesnik CA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 Jul; 106(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 27282131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A review of positive conditioned reinforcement.
    KELLEHER RT; GOLLUB LR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1962 Oct; 5(4 Suppl):543-97. PubMed ID: 14031747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessing potential reinforcement-like effects of brief stimuli unrelated to food reinforcers.
    Bai JYH; Cowie S; Macaskill AC; Elliffe D; Podlesnik CA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 Mar; 113(2):363-389. PubMed ID: 31930510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Stimulus control and the effects of d-amphetamine in the rat.
    Laties VG; Wood RW; Rees DC
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1981; 75(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 6798618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessing the role of alternative response rates and reinforcer rates in resistance to extinction of target responding when combining stimuli.
    Podlesnik CA; Bai JY; Skinner KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 May; 105(3):427-44. PubMed ID: 27193243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Response-reinforcer relations and resistance to change.
    Podlesnik CA; Shahan TA
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jan; 77(1):109-25. PubMed ID: 17706897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessing functions of stimuli associated with rich-to-lean transitions using a choice procedure.
    Langford JS; Pitts RC; Hughes CE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Jul; 112(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 31257618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Examining the discriminative and strengthening effects of reinforcers in concurrent schedules.
    Boutros N; Elliffe D; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Sep; 96(2):227-41. PubMed ID: 21909166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Divided stimulus control depends on differential and nondifferential reinforcement: Testing a quantitative model.
    Gomes-Ng S; Cowie S; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2023 Nov; 120(3):344-362. PubMed ID: 37581958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Choosing among multiple alternatives: Relative and overall reinforcer rates.
    Beeby E; Alsop B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):204-222. PubMed ID: 28758210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of brief post-sample cues signaling presence or absence of reinforcers in delayed matching-to-sample.
    Gomes-Ng S; Baharrizki D; Cowie S; Elliffe D; Bai JYH
    Behav Processes; 2022 Aug; 200():104664. PubMed ID: 35654309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.