241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28940725)
1. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 3-unit fixed dental prostheses: Are the results of 2 abutment implants comparable to the results of 2 abutment teeth?
Pol CWP; Raghoebar GM; Kerdijk W; Boven GC; Cune MS; Meijer HJA
J Oral Rehabil; 2018 Feb; 45(2):147-160. PubMed ID: 28940725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years.
Pjetursson BE; Thoma D; Jung R; Zwahlen M; Zembic A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Oct; 23 Suppl 6():22-38. PubMed ID: 23062125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic multiple-unit fixed dental prostheses.
Sailer I; Strasding M; Valente NA; Zwahlen M; Liu S; Pjetursson BE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():184-198. PubMed ID: 30328185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survival rates and complication behaviour of tooth implant-supported, fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
von Stein-Lausnitz M; Nickenig HJ; Wolfart S; Neumann K; von Stein-Lausnitz A; Spies BC; Beuer F
J Dent; 2019 Sep; 88():103167. PubMed ID: 31306691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-unit fixed dental prostheses supported by either two abutment implants or two abutment teeth: A comparative retrospective cohort study.
Pol CWP; Raghoebar GM; Cune MS; Meijer HJA
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2022 Apr; 8(2):497-505. PubMed ID: 35384361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient-reported outcome measures focusing on aesthetics of implant- and tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wittneben JG; Wismeijer D; Brägger U; Joda T; Abou-Ayash S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():224-240. PubMed ID: 30328183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A systematic review of the influence of the implant-abutment connection on the clinical outcomes of ceramic and metal implant abutments supporting fixed implant reconstructions.
Pjetursson BE; Zarauz C; Strasding M; Sailer I; Zwahlen M; Zembic A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 18():160-183. PubMed ID: 30306682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The clinical success of tooth- and implant-supported zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses. A systematic review.
Le M; Papia E; Larsson C
J Oral Rehabil; 2015 Jun; 42(6):467-80. PubMed ID: 25580846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs.
Pjetursson BE; Sailer I; Makarov NA; Zwahlen M; Thoma DS
Dent Mater; 2015 Jun; 31(6):624-39. PubMed ID: 25935732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tooth-implant-supported posterior fixed dental prostheses with zirconia frameworks: 3-year clinical result.
Beuer F; Sachs C; Groesser J; Gueth JF; Stimmelmayr M
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jun; 20(5):1079-86. PubMed ID: 26399980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical outcomes of partial and full-arch all-ceramic implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Pieralli S; Kohal RJ; Rabel K; von Stein-Lausnitz M; Vach K; Spies BC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 18():224-236. PubMed ID: 30306694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of rigid and non-rigid connections between implants and teeth on biological and technical complications: a systematic review and a meta-analysis.
Tsaousoglou P; Michalakis K; Kang K; Weber HP; Sculean A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jul; 28(7):849-863. PubMed ID: 27350419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognosis of Combining Remaining Teeth and Implants in Double-Crown-Retained Removable Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Lian M; Zhao K; Feng Y; Yao Q
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(2):281–297. PubMed ID: 28938029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retrospective evaluation of complete-arch fixed partial dentures connecting teeth and implant abutments in patients with normal and reduced periodontal support.
Cordaro L; Ercoli C; Rossini C; Torsello F; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 16198167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Survival and complication rates of combined tooth-implant-supported fixed and removable partial dentures.
Nickenig HJ; Spiekermann H; Wichmann M; Andreas SK; Eitner S
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 18546767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Metal-free materials for fixed prosthodontic restorations.
Poggio CE; Ercoli C; Rispoli L; Maiorana C; Esposito M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 12(12):CD009606. PubMed ID: 29261853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Survival and complication rates of combined tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
Nickenig HJ; Schäfer C; Spiekermann H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):506-11. PubMed ID: 16958689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Prospective Clinical Study of Alumina-Toughened Zirconia Abutments for Implant-Supported Fixed Restorations with a Mean Follow-up Period of 6.9 Years.
Yoon HI; Yeo IL; Kim DJ; Kim HY; Han JS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(2):451-460. PubMed ID: 30883621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical performance of screw- versus cement-retained fixed implant-supported reconstructions--a systematic review.
Wittneben JG; Millen C; Brägger U
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29 Suppl():84-98. PubMed ID: 24660192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does the Presence of a Cantilever Influence the Survival and Success of Partial Implant-Supported Dental Prostheses? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Freitas da Silva EV; Dos Santos DM; Sonego MV; de Luna Gomes JM; Pellizzer EP; Goiato MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):815-823. PubMed ID: 30024997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
