452 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28941744)
1. Comparison of manual compression and vascular hemostasis devices after coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention through femoral artery access: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Dahal K; Rijal J; Shahukhal R; Sharma S; Watti H; Azrin M; Katikaneni P; Jimenez E; Tandon N; Modi K; Lee J
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Mar; 19(2):151-162. PubMed ID: 28941744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized comparison of a novel bioabsorbable vascular closure device versus manual compression in the achievement of hemostasis after percutaneous femoral procedures: the ECLIPSE (Ensure's Vascular Closure Device Speeds Hemostasis Trial).
Wong SC; Bachinsky W; Cambier P; Stoler R; Aji J; Rogers JH; Hermiller J; Nair R; Hutman H; Wang H;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Aug; 2(8):785-93. PubMed ID: 19695549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A multicenter randomized trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of a novel vascular closure device to manual compression in anticoagulated patients undergoing percutaneous transfemoral procedures: The CELT ACD trial.
Wong SC; Laule M; Turi Z; Sanad W; Crowley J; Degen H; Bennett K; Coleman JE; Bergman G
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 90(5):756-765. PubMed ID: 28296003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Network meta-analysis of studies comparing closure devices for femoral access after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Iannaccone M; Saint-Hilary G; Menardi D; Vadalà P; Bernardi A; Bianco M; Montefusco A; Omedè P; D'Amico S; Piazza F; Scacciatella P; D'Amico M; Moretti C; Biondi-Zoccai G; Gasparini M; Gaita F; D'Ascenzo F
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2018 Oct; 19(10):586-596. PubMed ID: 30045086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Vascular Closure Devices Versus Manual Compression After Femoral Artery Puncture in Women.
Gewalt SM; Helde SM; Ibrahim T; Mayer K; Schmidt R; Bott-Flügel L; Hoppe K; Ott I; Hieber J; Morath T; Byrne RA; Kufner S; Cassese S; Hoppmann P; Fusaro M; Schunkert H; Laugwitz KL; Kastrati A; Schüpke S;
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 11(8):e006074. PubMed ID: 30354782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rationale and design of a randomised clinical trial comparing vascular closure device and manual compression to achieve haemostasis after diagnostic coronary angiography: the Instrumental Sealing of ARterial puncture site - CLOSURE device versus manual compression (ISAR-CLOSURE) trial.
Xhepa E; Byrne RA; Schulz S; Helde S; Gewalt S; Cassese S; Linhardt M; Ibrahim T; Mehilli J; Hoppe K; Grupp K; Kufner S; Böttiger C; Hoppmann P; Burgdorf C; Fusaro M; Ott I; Schneider S; Hengstenberg C; Schunkert H; Laugwitz KL; Kastrati A;
EuroIntervention; 2014 Jun; 10(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 24952057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transulnar versus transradial access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Dahal K; Rijal J; Lee J; Korr KS; Azrin M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):857-65. PubMed ID: 26332022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. FemoSeal
Gabrielli R; Rosati MS; Millarelli M; Dante A; Maiorano M; Musilli A; Chiappa R; Ventura M
Ann Vasc Surg; 2018 Aug; 51():18-24. PubMed ID: 29678650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Arterial puncture closing devices compared with standard manual compression after cardiac catheterization: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Koreny M; Riedmüller E; Nikfardjam M; Siostrzonek P; Müllner M
JAMA; 2004 Jan; 291(3):350-7. PubMed ID: 14734598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hemostatic Wound Dressing for Postinterventional Hemostasis in Large Femoral Artery Access Sites: An Initial Efficacy and Safety Study.
Sauer A; Dierks A; Wolfschmidt F; Hassold N; Bley TA; Kickuth R
J Endovasc Ther; 2016 Oct; 23(5):744-50. PubMed ID: 27385152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomised comparison of manual compression and FemoSeal™ vascular closure device for closure after femoral artery access coronary angiography: the CLOSure dEvices Used in everyday Practice (CLOSE-UP) study.
Holm NR; Sindberg B; Schou M; Maeng M; Kaltoft A; Bøttcher M; Krusell LR; Hjort J; Thuesen L; Terkelsen CJ; Christiansen EH; Bøtker HE; Kristensen SD; Lassen JF;
EuroIntervention; 2014 Jun; 10(2):183-90. PubMed ID: 24603054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safety and efficacy of clip-based vs. suture mediated vascular closure for femoral access hemostasis: A prospective randomized single center study comparing the StarClose and the ProGlide device.
Klein-Wiele O; Baliota M; Kara K; Käunicke M; Schäfer H; Garbrecht M; Abdulghafor M; Garmer M; Hailer B
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):402-407. PubMed ID: 28500743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Retrospective Study Comparing the Effectiveness and Safety of EXOSEAL Vascular Closure Device to Manual Compression in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Transbrachial Procedures.
Wei X; Han T; Sun Y; Sun X; Wu Y; Wang S; Zhou J; Zhao Z; Jing Z
Ann Vasc Surg; 2020 Jan; 62():310-317. PubMed ID: 31449959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the boomerang wire vascular access management system versus manual compression alone during percutaneous diagnostic and interventional cardiovascular procedures: The boomerang™ wire vascular access management trial II.
Goswami NJ; Smalling RG; Sinha S; Gammon RS; Ramaiah VG
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jan; 87(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 25599884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Safety of transradial access compared to transfemoral access with hemostatic devices (vessel plugs and suture devices) after percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chugh Y; Bavishi C; Mojadidi MK; Elgendy IY; Faillace RT; Brilakis ES; Tamis-Holland J; Mamas M; Chugh SK
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Aug; 96(2):285-295. PubMed ID: 32521099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of radial versus femoral access site on coronary angiography and intervention outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Brener MI; Bush A; Miller JM; Hasan RK
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Dec; 90(7):1093-1104. PubMed ID: 28544320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of vascular closure devices vs manual compression after femoral artery puncture: the ISAR-CLOSURE randomized clinical trial.
Schulz-Schüpke S; Helde S; Gewalt S; Ibrahim T; Linhardt M; Haas K; Hoppe K; Böttiger C; Groha P; Bradaric C; Schmidt R; Bott-Flügel L; Ott I; Goedel J; Byrne RA; Schneider S; Burgdorf C; Morath T; Kufner S; Joner M; Cassese S; Hoppmann P; Hengstenberg C; Pache J; Fusaro M; Massberg S; Mehilli J; Schunkert H; Laugwitz KL; Kastrati A;
JAMA; 2014 Nov; 312(19):1981-7. PubMed ID: 25399273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Manual Compression to Vascular Closure Devices for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Arterial Procedures.
Cox T; Blair L; Huntington C; Lincourt A; Sing R; Heniford BT
Surg Technol Int; 2015 Nov; 27():32-44. PubMed ID: 26680377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of standard versus low dose heparin on access-related complications after coronary angiography through radial access: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Dahal K; Sharma S; Yousuf A; Lee J; Azrin M; Jimenez E; Modi K; Tandon N
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018; 19(5 Pt B):575-579. PubMed ID: 29223499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Manual Versus Mechanical Compression of the Radial Artery After Transradial Coronary Angiography: The MEMORY Multicenter Randomized Trial.
Petroglou D; Didagelos M; Chalikias G; Tziakas D; Tsigkas G; Hahalis G; Koutouzis M; Ntatsios A; Tsiafoutis I; Hamilos M; Kouparanis A; Konstantinidis N; Sofidis G; Pancholy SB; Karvounis H; Bertrand OF; Ziakas A
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jun; 11(11):1050-1058. PubMed ID: 29880098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
