511 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28941918)
1. Impact of Lesion Visibility on Transrectal Ultrasound on the Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer (Gleason Score 3 + 4 or Greater) with Transrectal Ultrasound-Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Biopsy.
Garcia-Reyes K; Nguyen HG; Zagoria RJ; Shinohara K; Carroll PR; Behr SC; Westphalen AC
J Urol; 2018 Mar; 199(3):699-705. PubMed ID: 28941918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy using three-dimensional ultrasound-based organ-tracking technology: Initial experience in Japan.
Yamada Y; Fujihara A; Shiraishi T; Ueda T; Yamada T; Ueno A; Inoue Y; Kaneko M; Kamoi K; Hongo F; Okihara K; Ukimura O
Int J Urol; 2019 May; 26(5):544-549. PubMed ID: 30793385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Targeted Biopsies Noninferior to Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Systematic Biopsies for the Detection of Prostate Cancer?
Delongchamps NB; Portalez D; Bruguière E; Rouvière O; Malavaud B; Mozer P; Fiard G; Cornud F;
J Urol; 2016 Oct; 196(4):1069-75. PubMed ID: 27079582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Single Center Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging against Transperineal Prostate Mapping Biopsy: An Analysis of Men with Benign Histology and Insignificant Cancer following Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy.
Pal RP; Ahmad R; Trecartan S; Voss J; Ahmed S; Bazo A; Lloyd J; Walton TJ
J Urol; 2018 Aug; 200(2):302-308. PubMed ID: 29477717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of Prospectively Assigned Likert Scores for Targeted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsies in Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer.
Costa DN; Lotan Y; Rofsky NM; Roehrborn C; Liu A; Hornberger B; Xi Y; Francis F; Pedrosa I
J Urol; 2016 Jan; 195(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 26192254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore prostate biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in biopsy naïve men with elevated prostate specific antigen.
Quentin M; Blondin D; Arsov C; Schimmöller L; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Albers P; Antoch G; Rabenalt R
J Urol; 2014 Nov; 192(5):1374-9. PubMed ID: 24866597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Manually controlled targeted prostate biopsy with real-time fusion imaging of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound: an early experience.
Shoji S; Hiraiwa S; Endo J; Hashida K; Tomonaga T; Nakano M; Sugiyama T; Tajiri T; Terachi T; Uchida T
Int J Urol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 25316213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk Stratification of Equivocal Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate.
Ullrich T; Quentin M; Arsov C; Schmaltz AK; Tschischka A; Laqua N; Hiester A; Blondin D; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L
J Urol; 2018 Mar; 199(3):691-698. PubMed ID: 28941924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Initial Experience with Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cognitive Guided Micro-Ultrasound Biopsies versus Established Transperineal Robotic Ultrasound Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Biopsies for Prostate Cancer.
Claros OR; Tourinho-Barbosa RR; Fregeville A; Gallardo AC; Muttin F; Carneiro A; Stabile A; Moschini M; Macek P; Cathala N; Mombet A; Sanchez-Salas R; Cathelineau X
J Urol; 2020 May; 203(5):918-925. PubMed ID: 31821099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gleason Score Determination with Transrectal Ultrasound-Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsies--Are We Gaining in Accuracy?
Lanz C; Cornud F; Beuvon F; Lefèvre A; Legmann P; Zerbib M; Delongchamps NB
J Urol; 2016 Jan; 195(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 26165586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trans-rectal ultrasound visibility of prostate lesions identified by magnetic resonance imaging increases accuracy of image-fusion targeted biopsies.
Ukimura O; Marien A; Palmer S; Villers A; Aron M; de Castro Abreu AL; Leslie S; Shoji S; Matsugasumi T; Gross M; Dasgupta P; Gill IS
World J Urol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1669-76. PubMed ID: 25656687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance.
Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Boxler S; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Klein T; Steinemann S; Bergstraesser C; Roethke M; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2015 Jan; 193(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25079939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of significant prostate cancer with magnetic resonance targeted biopsies--should transrectal ultrasound-magnetic resonance imaging fusion guided biopsies alone be a standard of care?
Delongchamps NB; Lefèvre A; Bouazza N; Beuvon F; Legman P; Cornud F
J Urol; 2015 Apr; 193(4):1198-204. PubMed ID: 25451824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fusion Guided Targeted Biopsy Evaluated by Transperineal Template Saturation Prostate Biopsy for the Detection and Characterization of Prostate Cancer.
Mortezavi A; Märzendorfer O; Donati OF; Rizzi G; Rupp NJ; Wettstein MS; Gross O; Sulser T; Hermanns T; Eberli D
J Urol; 2018 Aug; 200(2):309-318. PubMed ID: 29474846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy to Transperineal Template Mapping Biopsies Stratified by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score in the PROMIS Trial.
Lovegrove CE; Miah S; El-Shater Bosaily A; Bott S; Brown L; Burns-Cox N; Dudderidge T; Freeman A; Henderson A; Hindley R; Kaplan R; Kirkham A; Oldroyd R; Parker C; Persad R; Punwani S; Rosario D; Shergill I; Winkler M; Emberton M; Ahmed HU
J Urol; 2020 Jan; 203(1):100-107. PubMed ID: 31335254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective Evaluation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Prostate Cancer Detection.
Mertan FV; Greer MD; Shih JH; George AK; Kongnyuy M; Muthigi A; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
J Urol; 2016 Sep; 196(3):690-6. PubMed ID: 27101772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of real-time magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion image-guided transperineal target biopsy with needle tracking with a mechanical position-encoded stepper in detecting significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve men.
Shoji S; Hiraiwa S; Ogawa T; Kawakami M; Nakano M; Hashida K; Sato Y; Hasebe T; Uchida T; Tajiri T
Int J Urol; 2017 Apr; 24(4):288-294. PubMed ID: 28222486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy.
Rastinehad AR; Turkbey B; Salami SS; Yaskiv O; George AK; Fakhoury M; Beecher K; Vira MA; Kavoussi LR; Siegel DN; Villani R; Ben-Levi E
J Urol; 2014 Jun; 191(6):1749-54. PubMed ID: 24333515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Value of PSA Density in Combination with PI-RADS™ for the Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Prediction.
Distler FA; Radtke JP; Bonekamp D; Kesch C; Schlemmer HP; Wieczorek K; Kirchner M; Pahernik S; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2017 Sep; 198(3):575-582. PubMed ID: 28373135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
