These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28943454)

  • 1. Coronary artery calcium quantification on first, second and third generation dual source CT: A comparison study.
    Vonder M; Pelgrim GJ; Huijsse SEM; Haubenreisser H; Meyer M; van Ooijen PMA; Oudkerk M; Henzler T; Vliegenthart R
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017 Nov; 11(6):444-448. PubMed ID: 28943454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coronary calcium scores are systematically underestimated at a large chest size: A multivendor phantom study.
    Willemink MJ; Abramiuc B; den Harder AM; van der Werf NR; de Jong PA; Budde RP; Wildberger JE; Vliegenthart R; Willems TP; Greuter MJ; Leiner T
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(5):415-21. PubMed ID: 25980948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of cardiovascular risk on routine chest CT: Ordinal coronary artery calcium scoring as an accurate predictor of Agatston score ranges.
    Azour L; Kadoch MA; Ward TJ; Eber CD; Jacobi AH
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 27743881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coronary artery calcium scoring with photon-counting CT: first in vivo human experience.
    Symons R; Sandfort V; Mallek M; Ulzheimer S; Pourmorteza A
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Apr; 35(4):733-739. PubMed ID: 30635819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Iterative beam-hardening correction with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction in low voltage CT coronary calcium scoring with tin filtration: Impact on coronary artery calcium quantification and image quality.
    Tesche C; De Cecco CN; Schoepf UJ; Duguay TM; Albrecht MH; Caruso D; Varga-Szemes A; Lesslie VW; Ebersberger U; Canstein C; Thilo C; Hoffmann E; Allmendinger T; Nance JW
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(5):354-359. PubMed ID: 28756086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High-pitch dual-source CT for coronary artery calcium scoring: A head-to-head comparison of non-triggered chest versus triggered cardiac acquisition.
    Xia C; Vonder M; Pelgrim GJ; Rook M; Xie X; Alsurayhi A; van Ooijen PMA; van Bolhuis JN; Oudkerk M; Dorrius M; van der Harst P; Vliegenthart R
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2021; 15(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 32505593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of dose reduction and iterative reconstruction on CT calcium scores: a multi-manufacturer dynamic phantom study.
    van der Werf NR; Willemink MJ; Willems TP; Greuter MJW; Leiner T
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jun; 33(6):899-914. PubMed ID: 28102510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coronary CT angiography in the emergency department utilizing second and third generation dual source CT.
    Meyersohn NM; Szilveszter B; Staziaki PV; Scholtz JE; Takx RAP; Hoffmann U; Ghoshhajra BB
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(4):249-257. PubMed ID: 28506470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coronary artery calcium quantification using contrast-enhanced dual-energy computed tomography scans in comparison with unenhanced single-energy scans.
    Li Q; Berman BP; Hagio T; Gavrielides MA; Zeng R; Sahiner B; Gong Q; Fang Y; Liu S; Petrick N
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Aug; 63(17):175006. PubMed ID: 30101756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-pitch versus sequential mode for coronary calcium in individuals with a high heart rate: Potential for dose reduction.
    Vonder M; Vliegenthart R; Kaatee MA; van der Aalst CM; van Ooijen PMA; de Bock GH; Gratama JW; Kuijpers D; de Koning HJ; Oudkerk M
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(4):298-304. PubMed ID: 29551663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Nongated Chest CT and Dedicated Calcium Scoring CT for Coronary Calcium Quantification Using a 256-Dector Row CT Scanner.
    Chen Y; Hu Z; Li M; Jia Y; He T; Liu Z; Wei D; Yu Y
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):e267-e274. PubMed ID: 30685312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Approaches to ultra-low radiation dose coronary artery calcium scoring based on 3rd generation dual-source CT: A phantom study.
    McQuiston AD; Muscogiuri G; Schoepf UJ; Meinel FG; Canstein C; Varga-Szemes A; Cannao' PM; Wichmann JL; Allmendinger T; Vliegenthart R; De Cecco CN
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 26724647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feasibility of spectral shaping for detection and quantification of coronary calcifications in ultra-low dose CT.
    Vonder M; Pelgrim GJ; Huijsse SE; Meyer M; Greuter MJ; Henzler T; Flohr TG; Oudkerk M; Vliegenthart R
    Eur Radiol; 2017 May; 27(5):2047-2054. PubMed ID: 27572809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fully automated quantification method (FQM) of coronary calcium in an anthropomorphic phantom.
    van Praagh GD; van der Werf NR; Wang J; van Ommen F; Poelhekken K; Slart RHJA; Fleischmann D; Greuter MJW; Leiner T; Willemink MJ
    Med Phys; 2021 Jul; 48(7):3730-3740. PubMed ID: 33932026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inter-scan variability of coronary artery calcium scoring assessed on 64-multidetector computed tomography vs. dual-source computed tomography: a head-to-head comparison.
    Ghadri JR; Goetti R; Fiechter M; Pazhenkottil AP; Küest SM; Nkoulou RN; Windler C; Buechel RR; Herzog BA; Gaemperli O; Templin C; Kaufmann PA
    Eur Heart J; 2011 Aug; 32(15):1865-74. PubMed ID: 21546450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Agatston calcium score: a milestone in the history of cardiac CT.
    Schmermund A
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(6):414-7. PubMed ID: 25467829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Coronary artery calcification detection with invasive coronary angiography in comparison with unenhanced computed tomography.
    van Dijk JD; Shams MS; Ottervanger JP; Mouden M; van Dalen JA; Jager PL
    Coron Artery Dis; 2017 May; 28(3):246-252. PubMed ID: 28257295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of iterative reconstruction on coronary calcium scores at multiple heart rates: a multivendor phantom study on state-of-the-art CT systems.
    van der Werf NR; Willemink MJ; Willems TP; Greuter MJW; Leiner T
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jun; 34(6):947-957. PubMed ID: 29285725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cardiac-Specific Conversion Factors to Estimate Radiation Effective Dose From Dose-Length Product in Computed Tomography.
    Trattner S; Halliburton S; Thompson CM; Xu Y; Chelliah A; Jambawalikar SR; Peng B; Peters MR; Jacobs JE; Ghesani M; Jang JJ; Al-Khalidi H; Einstein AJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jan; 11(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 28823748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiation dose reduction for coronary artery calcium scoring at 320-detector CT with adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D.
    Tatsugami F; Higaki T; Fukumoto W; Kaichi Y; Fujioka C; Kiguchi M; Yamamoto H; Kihara Y; Awai K
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jun; 31(5):1045-52. PubMed ID: 25754302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.