These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28944361)

  • 1. Cone-beam computed tomography with ultra-low dose protocols for pre-implant radiographic assessment: An in vitro study.
    Liljeholm R; Kadesjö N; Benchimol D; Hellén-Halme K; Shi XQ
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(3):351-359. PubMed ID: 28944361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of subjective image analysis and effective dose between low-dose cone-beam computed tomography machines.
    Charuakkra A; Mahasantipiya P; Lehtinen A; Koivisto J; Järnstedt J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Jan; 52(2):20220176. PubMed ID: 36168973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Image quality assessment of low-dose protocols in cone beam computed tomography of the anterior maxilla.
    Ihlis RL; Kadesjö N; Tsilingaridis G; Benchimol D; Shi XQ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2022 Apr; 133(4):483-491. PubMed ID: 34742681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of different low-dose multidetector CT and cone beam CT protocols in maxillary sinus imaging: part I-an in vitro study.
    Almashraqi AA; Ahmed EA; Mohamed NS; Barngkgei IH; Elsherbini NA; Halboub ES
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Aug; 46(6):20160323. PubMed ID: 28266870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments.
    Lofthag-Hansen S
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (209):4-55. PubMed ID: 21229915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. As Low Dose as Sufficient Quality: Optimization of Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Scanning Protocol for Tooth Autotransplantation Planning and Follow-up in Children.
    EzEldeen M; Stratis A; Coucke W; Codari M; Politis C; Jacobs R
    J Endod; 2017 Feb; 43(2):210-217. PubMed ID: 28027823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study.
    Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visibility of anatomical landmarks in the region of the mandibular third molar, a comparison between a low-dose and default protocol of CBCT.
    Cederhag J; Iskanderani D; Alstergren P; Shi XQ; Hellén-Halme K
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2023 Aug; 81(6):449-455. PubMed ID: 36748228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictability and image quality of low-dose cone-beam computed tomography in computer-guided implantology: An experimental study.
    Horsch L; Labis C; Trebing CT; Kronsteiner D; Hilgenfeld T; Rammelsberg P; Schwindling FS
    J Dent; 2021 Sep; 112():103744. PubMed ID: 34252488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low-Dose Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Assessment of Alveolar Clefts: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Image Quality.
    Lemberger M; Regnstrand T; Karsten A; Benchimol D; Shi XQ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Apr; 153(4):897-903. PubMed ID: 37092973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimization of dental CBCT exposures through mAs reduction.
    Pauwels R; Seynaeve L; Henriques JC; de Oliveira-Santos C; Souza PC; Westphalen FH; Rubira-Bullen IR; Ribeiro-Rotta RF; Rockenbach MI; Haiter-Neto F; Pittayapat P; Bosmans H; Bogaerts R; Jacobs R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(9):20150108. PubMed ID: 26090934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring peri-implant bone lesions using low-dose cone-beam computed tomography.
    Leisner LC; Tasaka A; Trebing CT; Hilgenfeld T; Kosinski MA; Kronsteiner D; Rammelsberg P; Schwindling FS
    J Prosthodont Res; 2022 Apr; 66(2):326-332. PubMed ID: 34305085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of Low-Dose Protocols of CBCT on Dental Implant Planning.
    de Castro HS; Kehrwald R; Matheus RA; Gomes AF; Queiroz PM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(2):307-312. PubMed ID: 33909720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cone-beam CT versus multi-slice CT systems for postoperative imaging of cochlear implantation--a phantom study on image quality and radiation exposure using human temporal bones.
    Theunisse HJ; Joemai RM; Maal TJ; Geleijns J; Mylanus EA; Verbist BM
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Apr; 36(4):592-9. PubMed ID: 25420084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image quality assessment of three cone beam computed tomography scanners-an analysis of the visibility of anatomical landmarks.
    Baumann E; Bornstein MM; Dalstra M; Verna C; Dagassan-Berndt DC
    Eur J Orthod; 2022 Sep; 44(5):513-521. PubMed ID: 35366310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a low-dose protocol for cone beam computed tomography of the temporomandibular joint.
    Iskanderani D; Nilsson M; Alstergren P; Shi XQ; Hellen-Halme K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Sep; 49(6):20190495. PubMed ID: 32250642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy of low-dose cone beam computed tomography and metal artifact reduction tool for assessment of peri-implant bone defects: an in vitro study.
    Nomier AS; Gaweesh YSE; Taalab MR; El Sadat SA
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):615. PubMed ID: 36528573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of cone-beam computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography in diagnostic imaging of the midface: A comparative study on Phantom and cadaver head scans.
    Veldhoen S; Schöllchen M; Hanken H; Precht C; Henes FO; Schön G; Nagel HD; Schumacher U; Heiland M; Adam G; Regier M
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):790-800. PubMed ID: 27169574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantification of bone quality using different cone beam computed tomography devices: Accuracy assessment for edentulous human mandibles.
    Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Slagmolen P; Politis C; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(4):411-424. PubMed ID: 27990508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use.
    Jacobs R; Salmon B; Codari M; Hassan B; Bornstein MM
    BMC Oral Health; 2018 May; 18(1):88. PubMed ID: 29764458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.