477 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28944551)
1. Mendelian randomization with fine-mapped genetic data: Choosing from large numbers of correlated instrumental variables.
Burgess S; Zuber V; Valdes-Marquez E; Sun BB; Hopewell JC
Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 41(8):714-725. PubMed ID: 28944551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combining information on multiple instrumental variables in Mendelian randomization: comparison of allele score and summarized data methods.
Burgess S; Dudbridge F; Thompson SG
Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(11):1880-906. PubMed ID: 26661904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Statistical methods for cis-Mendelian randomization with two-sample summary-level data.
Gkatzionis A; Burgess S; Newcombe PJ
Genet Epidemiol; 2023 Feb; 47(1):3-25. PubMed ID: 36273411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of allele scores as instrumental variables for Mendelian randomization.
Burgess S; Thompson SG
Int J Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 42(4):1134-44. PubMed ID: 24062299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Disentangling the effects of traits with shared clustered genetic predictors using multivariable Mendelian randomization.
Batool F; Patel A; Gill D; Burgess S
Genet Epidemiol; 2022 Oct; 46(7):415-429. PubMed ID: 35638254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mendelian randomization analysis with multiple genetic variants using summarized data.
Burgess S; Butterworth A; Thompson SG
Genet Epidemiol; 2013 Nov; 37(7):658-65. PubMed ID: 24114802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity Analyses for Robust Causal Inference from Mendelian Randomization Analyses with Multiple Genetic Variants.
Burgess S; Bowden J; Fall T; Ingelsson E; Thompson SG
Epidemiology; 2017 Jan; 28(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 27749700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression.
Bowden J; Davey Smith G; Burgess S
Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):512-25. PubMed ID: 26050253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modal-based estimation via heterogeneity-penalized weighting: model averaging for consistent and efficient estimation in Mendelian randomization when a plurality of candidate instruments are valid.
Burgess S; Zuber V; Gkatzionis A; Foley CN
Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 47(4):1242-1254. PubMed ID: 29846613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization.
Burgess S; Small DS; Thompson SG
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2333-2355. PubMed ID: 26282889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of robust Mendelian randomization methods using summary data.
Slob EAW; Burgess S
Genet Epidemiol; 2020 Jun; 44(4):313-329. PubMed ID: 32249995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multivariable Mendelian randomization: the use of pleiotropic genetic variants to estimate causal effects.
Burgess S; Thompson SG
Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 181(4):251-60. PubMed ID: 25632051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An efficient and robust approach to Mendelian randomization with measured pleiotropic effects in a high-dimensional setting.
Grant AJ; Burgess S
Biostatistics; 2022 Apr; 23(2):609-625. PubMed ID: 33155035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extending the MR-Egger method for multivariable Mendelian randomization to correct for both measured and unmeasured pleiotropy.
Rees JMB; Wood AM; Burgess S
Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(29):4705-4718. PubMed ID: 28960498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the suitability of summary data for two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses using MR-Egger regression: the role of the I2 statistic.
Bowden J; Del Greco M F; Minelli C; Davey Smith G; Sheehan NA; Thompson JR
Int J Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 45(6):1961-1974. PubMed ID: 27616674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Beyond Mendelian randomization: how to interpret evidence of shared genetic predictors.
Burgess S; Butterworth AS; Thompson JR
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():208-16. PubMed ID: 26291580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mendelian randomization with a binary exposure variable: interpretation and presentation of causal estimates.
Burgess S; Labrecque JA
Eur J Epidemiol; 2018 Oct; 33(10):947-952. PubMed ID: 30039250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mendelian randomization analysis of a time-varying exposure for binary disease outcomes using functional data analysis methods.
Cao Y; Rajan SS; Wei P
Genet Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 40(8):744-755. PubMed ID: 27813215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Constrained instruments and their application to Mendelian randomization with pleiotropy.
Jiang L; Oualkacha K; Didelez V; Ciampi A; Rosa-Neto P; Benedet AL; Mathotaarachchi S; Richards JB; Greenwood CMT;
Genet Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 43(4):373-401. PubMed ID: 30635941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using published data in Mendelian randomization: a blueprint for efficient identification of causal risk factors.
Burgess S; Scott RA; Timpson NJ; Davey Smith G; Thompson SG;
Eur J Epidemiol; 2015 Jul; 30(7):543-52. PubMed ID: 25773750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
