These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28945646)

  • 1. Efficacy of Toric Contact Lenses in Fitting and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Contact Lens Wearers.
    Cox SM; Berntsen DA; Bickle KM; Mathew JH; Powell DR; Little BK; Lorenz KO; Nichols JJ
    Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Sep; 44 Suppl 1():S296-S299. PubMed ID: 28945646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Toric Versus Spherical Contact Lenses on Vision and Eyestrain.
    Berntsen DA; Cox SM; Bickle KM; Mathew JH; Powell DR; Seidman SH; Little BK; Lorenz KO; Nichols JJ
    Eye Contact Lens; 2019 Jan; 45(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 30562274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Synergeyes versus soft toric lenses: vision-related quality of life.
    Lipson MJ; Musch DC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 84(7):593-7. PubMed ID: 17632307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical Evaluation of Large Diameter Rigid-Gas Permeable Versus Soft Toric Contact Lenses for the Correction of Refractive Astigmatism. A MultiCenter Study.
    Michaud L; Bennett ES; Woo SL; Reeder R; Morgan BW; Dinardo A; Harthan JS
    Eye Contact Lens; 2018 May; 44(3):164-169. PubMed ID: 27898516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual performance and optical quality with soft lenses in keratoconus patients.
    Jinabhai A; Radhakrishnan H; Tromans C; O'Donnell C
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Mar; 32(2):100-16. PubMed ID: 22268571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of fitting toric soft contact lenses to current non-users.
    Sulley A; Young G; Lorenz KO; Hunt C
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Mar; 33(2):94-103. PubMed ID: 23406489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute-Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument.
    Hays RD; Mangione CM; Ellwein L; Lindblad AS; Spritzer KL; McDonnell PJ
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Dec; 110(12):2292-301. PubMed ID: 14644710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vision-specific quality of life and modes of refractive error correction.
    Walline JJ; Bailey MD; Zadnik K
    Optom Vis Sci; 2000 Dec; 77(12):648-52. PubMed ID: 11147734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of overnight contact lens corneal reshaping on refractive error-specific quality of life.
    Berntsen DA; Mitchell GL; Barr JT
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Jun; 83(6):354-9. PubMed ID: 16772893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contact lens fitting difficulties following refractive surgery for high myopia.
    Bufidis T; Konstas AG; Pallikaris IG; Siganos DS; Georgiadis N
    CLAO J; 2000 Apr; 26(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 10810942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia.
    Richdale K; Mitchell GL; Zadnik K
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):266-73. PubMed ID: 16699438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does offering only the spherical contact lens trial to the low astigmats mislead the practitioners?
    Chaudhry M; Sah SP; Sharma IP; Mondal S
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2021; 14(8):1281-1284. PubMed ID: 34414095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contact lens wear after photorefractive keratectomy: comparison between rigid gas permeable and soft contact lenses.
    Lim L; Siow KL; Chong JS; Tan DT
    CLAO J; 1999 Oct; 25(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 10555738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Corneal swelling caused by conventional and new-design low-Dk soft contact lenses following a 10-day daily wear trial regime.
    Rho CR; Pandey C; Kim SY; Kim MS
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Feb; 37(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 23916115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative descriptors of corneal topography that influence soft toric contact lens fitting.
    Szczotka LB; Roberts C; Herderick EE; Mahmoud A
    Cornea; 2002 Apr; 21(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 11917171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lens rotation and spherocylindrical over-refraction as predictors for soft toric lens evaluation.
    Myers RI; Castellano C; Becherer PD; Walter DE
    Optom Vis Sci; 1989 Sep; 66(9):573-8. PubMed ID: 2797710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical Performance of a Spherical Hybrid Lens Design in High Regular Astigmatism.
    Abou Samra WA; El-Emam DS; Kasem MA
    Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Sep; 44 Suppl 1():S66-S70. PubMed ID: 27660920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optical quality and visual performance with customised soft contact lenses for keratoconus.
    Jinabhai A; O'Donnell C; Tromans C; Radhakrishnan H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2014 Sep; 34(5):528-39. PubMed ID: 24758229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of single vision soft contact lenses on peripheral refraction.
    Kang P; Fan Y; Oh K; Trac K; Zhang F; Swarbrick H
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Jul; 89(7):1014-21. PubMed ID: 22729170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Overnight corneal reshaping versus soft disposable contact lenses: vision-related quality-of-life differences from a randomized clinical trial.
    Lipson MJ; Sugar A; Musch DC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Oct; 82(10):886-91. PubMed ID: 16276320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.