These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1064 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28945658)

  • 1. Extrinsic Cognitive Load Impairs Spoken Word Recognition in High- and Low-Predictability Sentences.
    Hunter CR; Pisoni DB
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):378-389. PubMed ID: 28945658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictive Sentence Context Reduces Listening Effort in Older Adults With and Without Hearing Loss and With High and Low Working Memory Capacity.
    Hunter CR; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1164-1177. PubMed ID: 34983897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tracking Cognitive Spare Capacity During Speech Perception With EEG/ERP: Effects of Cognitive Load and Sentence Predictability.
    Hunter CR
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1144-1157. PubMed ID: 32282402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dual-Task Accuracy and Response Time Index Effects of Spoken Sentence Predictability and Cognitive Load on Listening Effort.
    Hunter CR
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211018092. PubMed ID: 34674579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).
    Roman AS; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Faulkner KF
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):344-356. PubMed ID: 28045787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Rudner M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):272-286. PubMed ID: 29923867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Semantic Predictability Facilitates Comprehension of Degraded Speech in a Graded Manner.
    Bhandari P; Demberg V; Kray J
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():714485. PubMed ID: 34566795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recognition of lexically controlled words and sentences by children with normal hearing and children with cochlear implants.
    Eisenberg LS; Martinez AS; Holowecky SR; Pogorelsky S
    Ear Hear; 2002 Oct; 23(5):450-62. PubMed ID: 12411778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship of Grammatical Context on Children's Recognition of s/z-Inflected Words.
    Spratford M; McLean HH; McCreery R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):799-809. PubMed ID: 28972469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effort of Repairing a Misperceived Word Can Impair Perception of Following Words, Especially for Listeners With Cochlear Implants.
    Winn MB
    Ear Hear; 2024 Nov-Dec 01; 45(6):1527-1541. PubMed ID: 38886880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Word recognition within a linguistic context: effects of age, hearing acuity, verbal ability, and cognitive function.
    Benichov J; Cox LC; Tun PA; Wingfield A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 21918453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interactions Between Item Set and Vocoding in Serial Recall.
    Bosen AK; Luckasen MC
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1404-1417. PubMed ID: 31033634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bilateral cochlear implantation versus unilateral cochlear implantation in deaf children: Effects of sentence context and listening conditions on recognition of spoken words in sentences.
    Lee Y; Sim H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Oct; 137():110237. PubMed ID: 32658807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effects of Task Difficulty Predictability and Noise Reduction on Recall Performance and Pupil Dilation Responses.
    Micula A; Rönnberg J; Fiedler L; Wendt D; Jørgensen MC; Larsen DK; Ng EHN
    Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1668-1679. PubMed ID: 33859121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lexical effects on spoken-word recognition in children with normal hearing.
    Krull V; Choi S; Kirk KI; Prusick L; French B
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):102-14. PubMed ID: 19701087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Priming and sentence context support listening to noise-vocoded speech by younger and older adults.
    Sheldon S; Pichora-Fuller MK; Schneider BA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):489-99. PubMed ID: 18177176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Impact of Age, Background Noise, Semantic Ambiguity, and Hearing Loss on Recognition Memory for Spoken Sentences.
    Koeritzer MA; Rogers CS; Van Engen KJ; Peelle JE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 61(3):740-751. PubMed ID: 29450493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of Context and Hearing Loss on Time-Gated Word Recognition in Children.
    Lewis D; Kopun J; McCreery R; Brennan M; Nishi K; Cordrey E; Stelmachowicz P; Moeller MP
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):e180-e192. PubMed ID: 28045838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 54.